Stockman v. California, 409 U.S. 979 (1972). · Go Syfert
Search
Stockman v. California, 409 U.S. 979 (1972). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
50 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 27 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Maestas (utahctapp, 1991-07-23)
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973 1999 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Maestas
Utah Ct. App. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Annotation, Validity and Construction of Statute Requiring Defendant in Criminal Case to Disclose Matter as to Alibi Defense, 45 A.L.R.3d 958 , 965 (1972). “ ‘The purpose of due process is to prevent fundamental unfairness, and one of its essential elements is the opportunity to defend.’ ” Provo City v. Werner, 810 P.2d 469, 472 (Utah App.1991) (failure of defendant to take advantage of opportunity to obtain an independent chemical analysis did not constitute denial of due process) (quoting State v. Snipes, 478 S.W.2d 299, 303 (Mo.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 979 , 93 S.Ct. 332 , 34 L…
cited Cited "see" Branham v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Cal. Ct. App. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. (9th Cir. 1972) 460 F.2d 17 (cert. den. 409 U.S. 979 [ 34 L.Ed.2d 243 , 93 S.Ct. 308 ]); Pacific Indem.
Stockman
v.
California
No. 71-6682.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 6, 1972.
409 U.S. 979
Published

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.