green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.0 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 38 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
State v. Wright
But see Busik v. Levine, 63 N.J. 351, 365, n. 4 , 307 A. 2d 571 (1973), appeal dismissed, 414 U.S. 1106 , 94 S.Ct. 831 , 38 L.Ed. 2d 733 (1973) (noting that burden of proof may be deemed procedural for some purposes and not for others).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Ww v. Im
it is unlikely that the supreme court has the authority to render inadmissible under its rule-making power evidence that would be admissible under the rules of evidence.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Byrd
See Busik v. Levine, 63 N.J. 351, 367-68 , 307 A. 2d 571 ("The [1967] rules of evidence were adopted cooperatively by the three branches of government under the Evidence Act, 1960...."), appeal dismissed, 414 U.S. 1106 , 94 S.Ct. 831 , 38 L.Ed. 2d 733 (1973); Supreme Court Order dated September 15, 1992 (adopting New Jersey Rules of Evidence, N.J.R.E. 101 to 1103, pursuant to provisions of N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-36, effective July 1, 1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Byrd
See Busik v. Levine, 63 N.J. 351, 367-68 , 307 A.2d 571 (“The [1967] rules of evidence were adopted cooperatively by the three branches of government under the Evidence Act, 1960 ____”), appeal dismissed, 414 U.S. 1106 , 94 S.Ct. 831 , 38 L.Ed.2d 733 (1973); Supreme Court Order dated September 15, 1992 (adopting New Jersey Rules of Evidence, N.J.R.E. 101 to 1103, pursuant to provisions of N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-36, effective July 1,1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation
See Busik v. Levine, 63 N.J. 351, 364 , 307 A.2d 571 , appeal dismissed, 414 U.S. 1106 , 94 S.Ct. 831 , 38 L.Ed.2d 733 (1973) (permitting a court to “decide issues which need not be decided when it believes that course is warranted”).
discussed
Cited "see"
State ex rel. Y.S.
See pages 465-66, 934 A.2d pages 1143-44, supra. Although accurate, these observations are not dispositive because “a rule of procedure may have an impact upon the substantive result and be no less a rule of procedure on that account.” Busik v. Levine, 63 N.J. 353 , 364, 307 A.2d 571 (1973), appeal dismissed, 414 U.S. 1106 , 94 S.Ct 831 , 38 L.Ed.2d 733 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams v. State
See Busik v. Levine, 63 N.J. 351, 364 , 307 A.2d 571 ("[I]t is simplistic to assume that all law is divided neatly between ‘substance’ and 'procedure.' A rule of procedure may have an impact upon the substantive result and be no less a rule of procedure on that account."), appeal dismissed, 414 U.S. 1106 , 94 S.Ct. 831 , 38 L.Ed.2d 733 (1973); State v. Leonardis, 73 N.J. 360, 374 , 375 A.2d 607 (1977) ("[I]n many situations procedure and substance are so interwoven that rational separation becomes well-nigh impossible." (internal quotation marks omitted)).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Pl 2001, Chapter 362
See Busik v. Levine, 63 N.J. 351, 364 , 307 A. 2d 571 ("[I]t is simplistic to assume that all law is divided neatly between `substance' and `procedure.' A rule of procedure may have an impact upon the substantive result and be no less a rule of procedure on that account."), appeal dismissed, 414 U.S. 1106 , 94 S.Ct. 831 , 38 L.Ed. 2d 733 (1973); State v. Leonardis, 73 N.J. 360, 374 , 375 A. 2d 607 (1977) ("[I]n many situations procedure and substance are so interwoven that rational separation becomes well-nigh impossible." (internal quotation marks omitted)).
discussed
Cited "see"
BASF Corp. Coating & Ink Division v. Town of Belvidere
See Busik v. Levine, 63 N.J. 351, 363-64 , 307 A.2d 571 , appeal dismissed, 414 U.S. 1106 , 94 S.Ct. 831 , 38 L.Ed.2d 733 (1973) (permitting a court to decide issues not requiring decision when the court “believes that course is warranted”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Random House, Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation
See Busik v. Levine, 63 N.J. 351, 364 , 307 A.2d 571 , appeal dismissed, 414 U.S. 1106 , 94 S.Ct. 831 , 38 L.Ed.2d 733 (1973) (stating that a court “may deliberately decide issues which need not be decided when it believes that course is warranted”).
cited
Cited "see"
Marsden v. Encompass Ins. Co.
See Busik v. Levine, 63 N.J. 351, 358-59 , 307 A.2d 571, 575 , appeal dismissed, 414 U.S. 1106 , 94 S.Ct. 831 , 38 L.Ed. 2d 733 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Scholz v. Metropolitan Pathologists, P.C.
(2×)
See Busik v. Levine, 63 N.J. 351 , 307 A.2d 571, 576 , appeal dismissed, Levine v. Busik, 414 U.S. 1106 , 94 S.Ct. 831 , 38 L.Ed.2d 733 (1973) (allowing prejudgment interest for future damages and observing that for both past and future damages "the defendant has had the use, and the plaintiff has not, of moneys which the judgment finds was the damage plaintiff suffered").
discussed
Cited "see"
Leonardis v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.
See Busik v. Levine, 63 N.J. 351, 372-73 [ 307 A.2d 571 ] (1973) [, appeal dismissed, 414 U.S. 1106 , 94 S.Ct. 831 , 38 L.Ed.2d 733 (1973)], in which Chief Justice Weintraub explained that the subject of counsel fees, despite its substantive dollar impact on litigants, “has been consistently held to be one of practice and procedure within the constitutional grant of power to the [New Jersey] Supreme Court.” ... [W]e do not think it appropriate to foreclose any litigant who properly seeks redress in our courts, whether or not a resident and whether or not our substantive law applies, from t…
discussed
Cited "see"
City of Plainfield v. State Health Benefits Commission
See Busik v. Levine, 63 N.J. 351, 358 , 307 A.2d 571 , appeal dismissed, 414 U.S. 1106 , 94 S.Ct. 831 , 38 L.Ed.2d 733 (1973); County of Essex v. Waldman, 244 N.J.Super. 647, 667 , 583 A.2d 384 (App.Div.1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Lehmann v. O'BRIEN
See Busik v. Levine, 63 N.J. 351, 356-357 [ 307 A. 2d 571 ] (1973), app. dism. 414 U.S. 1106 , 94 S.Ct. 831 , 38 L.Ed. 2d 733 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Hendricks v. AJ Ross Co.
See Busik v. Levine, 63 N.J. 351, 356-357 (1973), appeal dism. 414 U.S. 1106 , 94 S.Ct. 831 , 38 L.Ed. 2d 733 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Frank v. Ivy Club
See Busik v. Levine, 63 N.J. 351, 364 (1973), app. dis. 414 U.S. 1106 , 94 S.Ct. 831 , 38 L.Ed. 2d 733 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Reliable Tire Distributors, Inc. v. Kelly Springfield Tire Co.
See Busik v. Levine, 63 N.J. 351 , 307 A.2d 571 , app. dismissed, Levine v. Busik, 414 U.S. 1106 , 94 S.Ct. 831 , 38 L.Ed.2d 733 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Zippertubing Co. v. Teleflex Inc.
See Busik v. Levine, 63 N.J. 351 , 307 A.2d 571 , appeal dismissed, 414 U.S. 1106 , 94 S.Ct. 831 , 38 L.Ed.2d 733 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
ca3 1985
See Busik v. Levine, 63 N.J. 351 , 307 A.2d 571 , appeal dismissed, 414 U.S. 1106 , 94 S.Ct. 831 , 38 L.Ed.2d 733 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Conroy
See generally Busik v. Levine, 63 N.J. 351, 363-364 , appeal dismissed 414 U.S. 1106 , 94 S.Ct. 831 , 38 L.Ed. 2d 733 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Laudenberger v. Port Auth. of Allegheny
See 480 Pa. XLI (1978). [2] See, Boggs v. Blue Diamond Coal Co., 497 F.Supp. 1105 , 1121 n. 82 (E.D.Ky. 1980) where the court stated, "the Sibbach test, as worded, leaves a number of gray areas, because it is circular, defining procedure as a means of protecting substantive rights, without providing a test for the latter." [3] 3 Cyclopedia of Federal Procedure § 8.12 (1967). [4] Busik v. Levine, 63 N.J. 351 , 307 A.2d 571 (1973), appeal dismissed, 414 U.S. 1106 , 94 S.Ct. 831 , 38 L.Ed.2d 733 (1973). [5] Prior to 1968, the General Assembly had explicitly granted restricted rule-making authori…
examined
Cited "see"
Irene Lindenau v. Clifford Alexander
(4×)
See Schlanger v. United States, 586 F.2d 667 (9th Cir.), Doe v. Alexander, 510 F.Supp. 900 (D.Minn.), Turner v. Egan, 358 F.Supp. 560 (D.Alaska), aff'd, 414 U.S. 1105 , 94 S.Ct. 831 , 38 L.Ed.2d 733 , and others. 21 The Third Circuit in a significant decision in Dillard v. Brown, 652 F.2d 316 , declined to adopt the position of the Fifth Circuit and reviewed plaintiff's claim directed to an Army regulation. 22 There is no guidance from the Supreme Court on how to proceed in determining how far the judiciary should inquire into military matters.
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Pago Pago Aircrash of January 30, 1974
See Busik v. Levine, 63 N.J. 351 , 307 A.2d 571 , appeal dismissed, 414 U.S. 1106 , 94 S.Ct. 831 , 38 L.Ed.2d 733 (1973); Ford v. Garvin, 127 N.J.Super. 391 , 317 A.2d 425 (App.Div.1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Raupp
See Busik v. Levine, 63 N.J. 351, 373-374 (1973), app. dism. 414 U.S. 1106 , 94 S.Ct. 831 , 38 L.Ed. 2d 733 (1973); Winberry v. Salisbury, 5 N.J. 240 (1950), cert. den. 340 U.S. 877 , 71 S.Ct. 123 , 95 L.Ed. 638 (1950); Weinstein, "Reform of Federal Court Rulemaking Procedures," 76 Colum.
cited
Cited "see"
Kotzian v. Barr
See the dissenting opinion of Judge Conford in Busik v. Levine, 63 N.J. 351, 376 (1973), app. dism. 414 U.S. 1106 , 94 S.Ct. 831 , 38 L.Ed. 2d 733 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Simons v. Saaz
See Busik v. Levine, 63 N.J. 351, 360-361 , app. dism. 414 U.S. 1106 , 94 S.Ct. 831 , 38 L.Ed. 2d 733 (1973); Hill v. Newman, 126 N.J.
discussed
Cited "see"
Polglase v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
Accord, Busik v. Levine, 63 N.J. 351 , 307 A.2d 571 , appeal dismissed, 414 U.S. 1106 , 94 S.Ct. 831 , 38 L.Ed.2d 733 , (1973), and authorities cited at 307 A.2d at 580-81 , including the above quoted Comment in the Restatement.
cited
Cited "see"
In re the Commitment of Geraghty to the New Jersey Neuro-Psychiatric Institute
Ed. 2d 124 (1962); see generally, Busik v. Levine, 63 N. J. 351, 363-64 (1973), appeal dismissed 414 U. S. 1106 , 94 S. Ct. 831 , 38 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Geraghty
Council, 48 N.J. 94, 109 (1966); State v. Perricone, 37 N.J. 463, 469 (1962), cert. denied 371 U.S. 890 , 83 S.Ct. 189 , 9 L.Ed.2d 124 (1962); see generally, Busik v. Levine, 63 N.J. 351, 363-64 (1973), appeal dismissed 414 U.S. 1106 , 94 S.Ct. 831 , 38 L.Ed.2d 733 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Norflett
See Busik v. Levine, 63 N. J. 351, 363-64 (1973), appeal dismissed, 414 U. S. 1106 , 94 S. Ct. 831 , 38 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
C.A. v. Bentolila
Byrd, supra, 198 N.J. at 344 , 967 A.2d 285 ; see also Busik v. Levine, 63 N.J. 351, 367 , 307 A.2d 571 (noting that evidence rules may contain elements of both procedural and substantive law), appeal dismissed, 414 U.S. 1106 , 94 S.Ct. 831 , 38 L.Ed.2d 733 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McMahon v. New Jersey Mfrs. Ins.
Heim v. Wolpaw, 271 N.J.Super. 538, 543 , 638 A. 2d 1373 (App. Div.), certif. denied, 137 N.J. 316 , 645 A. 2d 143 (1994); see also Busik v. Levine, 63 N.J. 351 , 307 A. 2d 571 , appeal dismissed, 414 U.S. 1106 , 94 S.Ct. 831 , 38 L.Ed. 2d 733 (1973).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Exxon Research and Engineering Co. v. Industrial Risk Insurers
See also Busik v. Levine, 63 N.J. 351, 364 , 307 A. 2d 571 (1973), appeal dismissed, 414 U.S. 1106 , 94 S.Ct. 831 , 38 L.Ed. 2d 733 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McKenna v. Pacific Rail Service
See, e.g., Busik v. Levine, 63 N.J. 351 , 307 A.2d 571 (1973), appeal dismissed, 414 U.S. 1106 , 94 S.Ct. 831 , 38 L.Ed.2d 733 (1974); Milazzo v. Exxon Corp, 243 N.J.Super. 573 , 580 A.2d 1107 (Law Div.1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
PLAYCRAFTERS, ETC. v. Teaneck Tp. Bd. of Ed.
See also, Busik v. Levine, 63 N.J. 351, 364 (1973), app. dism. 414 U.S. 1106 , 94 S.Ct. 831 , 38 L.Ed. 2d 733 (1973); United Hunters Assn. of N.J., Inc. v. Adams, 36 N.J. 288, 293 (1962); Humane Society of the U.S., etc. v. Guido, 173 N.J.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Humane Society of the United States v. Guido
See, also, Busik v. Levine, 63 N.J. 351, 364 (1973), app. dism. 414 U.S. 1106 , 94 S.Ct. 831 , 38 L.Ed.2d 733 (1973); United Hunters Ass’n. of N.J., Inc. v. Adams, 36 N.J. 288, 293 (1962).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kotzian v. Barr
(2×)
See ante at 363-364; ; 152 N.J.Super. at 566 ; see also Busik v. Levine, 63 N.J. 351, 358-360 (1973), app. dism., 414 U.S. 1106 , 94 S.Ct. 831 , 38 L.Ed.2d 733 (1973).
Turner
v.
Egan
v.
Egan
No. 73-519.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 17, 1973.
Hearing, Jurisdiction, Merits, Question.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
Citer courts: New Jersey Superior Court App … (1)
Affirmed on appeal from D. C. Alaska.
Mr. Justice Douglas would postpone question of jurisdiction to hearing of case on the merits.