green
Positive treatment
5.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Noble Adjin Lartey
See United States v. Weinstein, 511 F.2d 622 , 627 n. 5 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1042 , 95 S.Ct. 2655 , 45 L.Ed.2d 693 (1975); United States v. Interstate Dress Carriers, Inc., 280 F.2d 52, 54 (2d Cir.1960).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Seni
See United States v. Rogers, 504 F.2d 1079 (5th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1042 , 95 S.Ct. 2655 , 45 L.Ed.2d 693 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Victor Jacob Seni, United States of America v. Bobby Lee Minton, United States of America v. Samuel Ellis Ferguson, United States of America v. Hector Morales, United States of America v. Carlos Fiusa, United States of America v. Pablo Raul Alonso
See United States v. Rogers, 504 F.2d 1079 (5th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1042 , 95 S.Ct. 2655 , 45 L.Ed.2d 693 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bobbie Stanford, Louis Watson, Janice Davis, Estella Patterson, Doris Beverly, Dorothy Fife, Richard O'rourke, and Dorothy Jones
See United States v. Weinstein, 511 F.2d 622 (2d Cir.) cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1042 , 95 S.Ct. 2655 , 45 L.Ed.2d 693 (1975); United States v. Interstate Dress Carriers, supra; In re Grand Jury Investigation of Ven-Fuel, 441 F.Supp. 1299 (M.D.
cited
Cited "see"
Doe v. Beal
See Wulff v. Singleton, 508 F.2d 1211 (8th Cir. 1974), cert. granted, 422 U.S. 1041 , 95 S.Ct. 2655 , 45 L.Ed.2d 692 (1975); Doe v. Rose, 499 F.2d 1112 (10th Cir. 1974); Doe v. Myatt, Civ.
cited
Cited "see"
Portland Retail Druggists Association, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories
See 95 S.Ct. 2655 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thomas E. Short, United States of America v. Curtis Drummond
See, e.g., United States v. Rogers, 504 F.2d 1079, 1084 (5th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1042 , 95 S.Ct. 2655 , 45 L.Ed.2d 693 (1975) (instruction not proper absent some evidence to counter strong inference of intent to distribute).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Doe Grand Jury Proceedings
See, e.g., United States v. Weinstein, 511 F.2d 622 , 627 n.5 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1042 , 95 S.Ct. 2655 , 45 L.Ed.2d 693 (1975); Golden Quality Ice Cream Co. v. Deerfield Specialty Papers, Inc., 87 F.R.D. 53, 59 (E.D.Pa.1980); In re Grand Jury Investigation of Ven-Fuel, 441 F.Supp. 1299, 1303 (M.D.Fla.1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Aulden E. Thomas v. United States
See also United States v. Weinstein, 511 F.2d 622, 627 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1042 , 95 S.Ct. 2655 , 45 L.Ed.2d 793 (1975); United States v. Bass, 472 F.2d 207, 210 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 412 U.S. 928 , 93 S.Ct. 2751 , 37 L.Ed.2d 155 (1973).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rmi Company Nl Industries, Inc. v. Hon. Daniel J. Snyder, Jr., United States District Judge for the Western District of Pennsylvania
See, e. g., United States v. Weinstein, 511 F.2d 622, 626-27 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1042 , 95 S.Ct. 2655 , 45 L.Ed.2d 693 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jose Ernesto Rodriguez, United States of America v. Octavio Leal-Cuen
See e. g., United States v. Rogers, 504 F.2d 1079, 1083 (5th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1042 , 95 S.Ct. 2655 , 45 L.Ed.2d 693 (1975); United States v. Sisca, 503 F.2d 1337, 1339 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1008 , 95 S.Ct. 328 , 42 L.Ed.2d 283 (1974); United States v. Murray, 492 F.2d 178, 192 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 854 , 95 S.Ct. 98 , 42 L.Ed.2d 87 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Application of the United States of America in the Matter of an Order Authorizing the Use of a Pen Register or Similar Mechanical Device
(2×)
See, e. g., United States v. Weinstein, 511 F.2d 622, 626 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1042 , 95 S.Ct. 2655 , 45 L.Ed.2d 693 (1975); United States v. Dooling, 406 F.2d 192 ,198 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 911 , 89 S.Ct. 1744 , 23 L.Ed.2d 224 (1969); Electric & Musical Industries Ltd. v. Walsh, 249 F.2d 308 (2d Cir. 1957).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
District of Columbia v. Russell E. Train, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency
Compare Kentucky v. Ruckelshaus, 497 F.2d 1172 (6th Cir. 1974), cert, granted sub nom., Hancock v. Train, 420 U.S. 971 , 95 S.Ct. 1390 , 43 L.Ed.2d 650 (1975) (substantive only), with People of St. of Calif., etc. v. Environmental Protection Agency, 511 F.2d 963 (9th Cir.), cert. *1253 granted 422 U.S. 1041 , 95 S.Ct. 2655 , 45 L.Ed.2d 693 (1975), and Alabama v. Seeber, 502 F.2d 1238 (5th Cir. 1974) (substantive and procedural). 7 . 42 U.S.C. § 1857f.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Environmental Protection Agency
v.
California ex rel. State Water Resources Control Board
v.
California ex rel. State Water Resources Control Board
No. 74-1435.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 23, 1975.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted and case set for oral argument with No. 74 — 220, Hancock v. Train [certiorari granted, 420 U. S. 971]. Reported below: 511 F. 2d 963.