green
Positive treatment
7.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 27 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Jerry Alvin Williams
But see United States v. Griffin, 502 F.2d 959 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1050 , 95 S.Ct. 626 , 42 L.Ed.2d 645 (1974) (illegal entry followed by search with a warrant; suppression of evidence gathered in second search essential to deter illegal entry); United States v. Langley, 466 F.2d 27 (6th Cir. 1972); United States v. Nelson, 459 F.2d 884, 888-89 (6th Cir. 1972); People v. Cook, 22 Cal.3d 67 , 148 Cal.Rptr. 605 , 583 P.2d 130, 145-49 (1978) (In Bank) (emphasis on suppression as a deterrent; discourage “confirmatory searches” in which an illegal search is made but not used in t…
cited
Cited "see"
White v. Moulder
See Christman v. Hanrahan, 500 F.2d 65, 67-68 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1050 , 95 S.Ct. 626 , 42 L.Ed.2d 644 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
White v. Moulder
See Christman v. Hanrahan, 500 F.2d 65, 67-68 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1050 , 95 S.Ct. 626 , 42 L.Ed.2d 644 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Luper v. Banner Industries, Inc. (In Re Lee Way Holding Co.)
Accord, Dannerbeck v. Palmer, 502 F.2d 686 (9th Cir.), cert. den. 419 U.S. 1050 , 95 S.Ct. 626 , 42 L.Ed.2d 645 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Handtmann
See United States v. Griffin, 502 F.2d 959 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1050 , 95 S.Ct. 626 , 42 L.Ed.2d 645 (1974); see also, Note, Inevitable Discovery: The Hypothetical Independent Source Exception to the Exclusionary Rule, 5 Hofstra L.Rev. 137, 158 (1976); 4 W.
cited
Cited "see"
De Smet v. Snyder
See Christman v. Hanrahan, 500 F.2d 65, 67 (7th Cir.), cert, denied, 419 U.S. 1050 , 95 S.Ct. 626 , 42 L.Ed.2d 644 (1974); Jones v. City of Chicago, 639 F.Supp. 146, 151-52 (N.D.I11.1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca1 1985
See United States v. Griffin, 502 F.2d 959 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1050 , 95 S.Ct. 626 , 42 L.Ed.2d 645 (1974); see also Commonwealth v. Benoit, 382 Mass. 210 , 415 N.E.2d 818 (1981) (evidence found as direct product of illegal warrantless search not subject to argument that without search, evidence would inevitably have been discovered through a later search pursuant to a warrant).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Moscatiello
See United States v. Griffin, 502 F.2d 959 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1050 , 95 S.Ct. 626 , 42 L.Ed.2d 645 (1974); see also Commonwealth v. Benoit, 382 Mass. 210 , 415 N.E.2d 818 (1981) (evidence found as direct product of illegal warrantless search not subject to argument that without search, evidence would inevitably have been discovered through a later search pursuant to a warrant).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Minnesota Kicks, Inc.
See Dannerbeck v. Palmer, 502 F.2d 686 (9th Cir.) cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1050 , 95 S.Ct. 626 , 42 L.Ed.2d 645 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Pace
Thus, we are “confronted with a situation where the police have illegally entered a [premises], discovered contraband, and then sought a search warrant in an attempt to validate the seizure of the fruits of the illegal entry” (People v Arnau, supra, p 31; see United States v Griffin, 502 F2d 959, cert den 419 US 1050 ; People v Williams, 37 NY2d 206 ).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Kenneth Lomas, United States of America v. Peter Kahn Margolis
(2×)
See United States v. Griffin, 502 F.2d 959, 961 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1050 , 95 S.Ct. 626 , 42 L.Ed.2d 645 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Holler
See United States v. Griffin, 502 F.2d 959, 961 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1050 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
National Post Office v. United States Postal Service
See International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, District No. 145 v. Modern Air Transport, Inc., 495 F.2d 1241, 1245 (5th Cir. 1974), cert. denied 419 U.S. 1050 , 95 S.Ct. 626 , 42 L.Ed.2d 644 (1974). 9 The Union brought this suit alleging that the Postal Service was refusing to live by the terms of the arbitrator's award.
discussed
Cited "see"
National Post Office Mail Handlers, Watchmen, Messengers & Group Leaders Division of Laborers' International Union of North America v. United States Postal Service
See International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, District No. 145 v. Modern Air Transport, Inc., 495 F.2d 1241, 1245 (5th Cir. 1974), cert. denied 419 U.S. 1050 , 95 S.Ct. 626 , 42 L.Ed.2d 644 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ali Asghar Taheri
See United States v. Griffin, 502 F.2d 959 (6th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1050 , 95 S.Ct. 626 , 42 L.Ed.2d 645 (1974) (per curiam) ....
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Benoit
See United States v. Griffin, 502 F.2d 959 (6th Cir.), cert, denied, 419 U.S. 1050 (1974); LaFave, supra at 624.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wayne Allard
See United States v. Griffin, 502 F.2d 959 (6th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1050 , 95 S.Ct. 626 , 42 L.Ed.2d 646 (1974) (per curiam); United States v. Korman, 614 F.2d 541, 551-52 (6th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 952 , 100 S.Ct. 2918 , 64 L.Ed.2d 808 (1980) (Merritt, J., dissenting). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ronald L. Korman
(2×)
See United States v. Griffin, 502 F.2d 959 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1050 , 95 S.Ct. 626 , 42 L.Ed.2d 645 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Vendo Co. v. Lektro-Vend Corp.
(2×)
See Response of Carolina v. Leasco Response, Inc., 498 F. 2d 314, 317-320 (CA5 1974), cert. denied, 419 U. S. 1050 ; Milsen Co. v. Southland Corp., 454 F. 2d 363 (CA7 1971); Helfenbein v. International Industries, Inc., 438 F. 2d 1068, 1071 (CA8 1971); Farbenfabriken Bayer, A. G. v. Sterling Drug, Inc., 307 F. 2d 207 (CA3 1962); Tampa Electric Co. v. Nashville Coal Co., 276 F. 2d 766 (CA6 1960); United States v. Bayer Co., 135 F. Supp. 65 (SDNY 1955).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jack D. Abercrombie v. Lum's, Inc.
See Response of Carolina v. Leasco Response, Inc., 5 Cir. 1974, 498 F.2d 314, 319 , cert. denied 419 U.S. 1050 , 95 S.Ct. 626 , 42 L.Ed.2d 645 ; Helfenbein v. International Industries, Inc., 8 Cir. 1971, 438 F.2d 1068 , cert. denied 404 U.S. 872 , 92 S.Ct. 63 , 30 L.Ed.2d 115 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ralph Joseph Palumbo
(2×)
Compare United States v. Griffin, 502 F.2d 959 (6th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1050 , 95 S.Ct. 626 , 42 L.Ed.2d 645 (1974) with United States v. Korman, 614 F.2d 541 (6th Cir.) (divided panel), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 952 , 100 S.Ct. 2918 , 64 L.Ed.2d 808 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Waldo v. North American Van Lines, Inc.
“If, however, ‘a class action tie-in claim is made, without basis in an express agreement, proof of salesmanship complied with inequality of bargaining power does not prove the existence of a tie, but rather proof of actual coercion on an individual basis is necessary to prove the existence of a tie.’ In the former case, the suit may proceed as a class action; in the latter, however, class certification must be denied.” Young v. Jo-Ann’s Nut House, 1980-81 Trade Cas., 1163, 746.at 77, 972 (D.N.J.1980); See also Response of Carolina v. Leasco Response, Inc., 537 F.2d 1307, 1326-31 (5t…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Daniel McCabe
See also United States v. Drawer, 482 F.2d 117, 131 (2d Cir.1973) (where, on cross-examination, defense counsel called to the jury’s attention the possibility that the accomplice/witness may have been lying at trial, the court’s refusal to review for the jury the accomplice’s more favorable grand jury testimony was not prejudicial), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1050 , 95 S.Ct. 628 , 42 L.Ed.2d 646 (1974).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Woodard
See also United States v Griffin, 502 F2d 959 (CA 6, 1974) cert den 419 US 1050 ; 95 S Ct 626 ; 42 L Ed 2d 645 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Crews v. United States
See also United States v. Griffin, 502 F.2d 959 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1050 , 95 S.Ct. 626 , 42 L.Ed.2d 645 (1974); and "operation of law," Wayne v. United States, supra (coroner's required autopsy of dead body).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca9 1975
Compare Thornton v. East Texas Motor Freight, 497 F.2d 416 , 420--21 (6th Cir. 1974) with Bing v. Roadway Express, Inc., 485 F.2d 441, 451 (5th Cir. 1973) and Franks v. Bowman, 495 F.2d 398 , 414--18 (5th Cir.), cert. denied 419 U.S. 1050 , 95 S.Ct. 625 , 42 L.Ed.2d 644 (1974) 8 Cf. Rodriguez v. East Texas Motor Freight, 505 F.2d 40 (5th Cir. 1974) 9 Id 10 See pp. 14--16, infra
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc.
Compare Thornton v. East Texas Motor Freight, 497 F.2d 416, 420-21 (6th Cir. 1974) with Bing v. Roadway Express, Inc., 485 F.2d 441, 451 (5th Cir. 1973) and Franks v. Bowman, 495 F.2d 398, 414-18 (5th Cir.), cert. denied 419 U.S. 1050 , 95 S.Ct. 625 , 42 L.Ed.2d 644 (1974). .
Bowman Transportation, Inc.
v.
Franks
v.
Franks
No. 74-424.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 9, 1974.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.