green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
6.2 score
G Cite
cited 4× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1981 ·
…attorney general's certification must be accepted by the district court as final.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. JD
(2×)
attorney general's certification must be accepted by the district court as final.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. J. D.
(2×)
attorney general's certification must be accepted by the district court as final.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Juvenile Male
See Russello v. United States, 464 U.S. 16, 23 (1983) ("`Where Congress includes particular language in one section of a statute but omits it in another section of the same Act, it is generally presumed that Congress acts intentionally and purposely in the disparate inclusion or exclusion.'") (quoting United States v. Wong Kim Bo, 472 F.2d 720, 722 (5th Cir. 1972)). 17 In addition, section 5032 contains no standards by which to judge a "substantial Federal interest." See United States v. Vancier, 515 F.2d 1378, 1380-81 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 857 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Juvenile Male 1
(2×)
See Russello v. United States, 464 U.S. 16, 23 , 104 S.Ct. 296, 300 , 78 L.Ed.2d 17 (1983) (" 'Where Congress includes particular language in one section of a statute but omits it in another section of the same Act, it is generally presumed that Congress acts intentionally and purposely in the disparate inclusion or exclusion.' ") (quoting United States v. Wong Kim Bo, 472 F.2d 720, 722 (5th Cir.1972)). 52 In addition, section 5032 contains no standards by which to judge a "substantial Federal interest." See United States v. Vancier, 515 F.2d 1378, 1380-81 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 857…
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Lopez
See United States v. McDaniels, 370 F.Supp. 298 (E.D.La.1973), affd, 509 F.2d 825 , cert. denied, 423 U.S. 857 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Waller v. Butkovich
See United States v. McDaniels, 370 F.Supp. 298, 301 (E.D.La.1973), aff 'd sub nom United States v. Goff, 509 F.2d 825 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 857 , 96 S.Ct. 109 , 46 L.Ed.2d 83 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Walter John Carter
See U. S. v. Goff, 5 Cir. 1975, 509 F.2d 825 , cert. denied, 423 U.S. 857 , 96 S.Ct. 109 , 46 L.Ed.2d 83 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward J. Arlt, III
See United States v. Goff, 5 Cir. 1975, 509 F.2d 825 , cert. denied, 423 U.S. 857 , 96 S.Ct. 109 , 46 L.Ed. 83 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Andre Willis King, United States of America v. Fred Neil Powell
See United States v. Turner, 528 F.2d 143 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 857 , 96 S.Ct. 108 , 46 L.Ed.2d 83 (1975); United States v. Gardner, 475 F.2d 1273 (9th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cervantes Salazar v. Dretke
See, e.g., Soria v. Johnson, 207 F.3d at 249 (“the fact that an identifiable minority group votes in a proportion lower than the rest of the population and is therefore underrepresented [sic] on jury panels presents no constitutional issue.”), quoting United States v. Brummitt, 665 F.2d 521, 527 (5th Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 456 U.S. 977 , 102 S.Ct. 2244 , 72 L.Ed.2d 852 (1982), in turn quoting United States v. Lopez, 588 F.2d 450, 452 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 947 , 99 S.Ct. 2895 , 61 L.Ed.2d 319 (1979), in turn citing United States v. Arlt, 567 F.2d 1295, 1297 (5th Cir.1978…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ramseur
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Goff, 509 F. 2d 825 (5th Cir.), cert. den., 423 U.S. 857 , 96 S.Ct. 109 , 46 L.Ed. 2d 83 (1975); People v. Harris, 36 Cal. 3d 36 , 679 P. 2d 433 , 201 Cal. Rptr. 782 , cert. den., 469 U.S. 965 , 105 S.Ct. 365 , 83 L.Ed. 2d 301 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Carwise v. State
Compare U.S. v. Goff, 509 F.2d 825 (5th Cir.1975), cert. den., 423 U.S. 857 , 96 S.Ct. 109 , 46 L.Ed.2d 83 (1975) (exclusive reliance on voter registration lists as a source of potential jurors upheld).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lloyd Wright, United States of America v. Marcus Franklin, United States of America v. Leonard Cross
United States v. Marx, 485 F.2d 1179, 1185 (10th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 986 , 94 S.Ct. 2391 , 40 L.Ed.2d 764 (1974); Caton v. United States, 407 F.2d 367 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 984 , 89 S.Ct. 2149 , 23 L.Ed.2d 773 (1969); see also Cunha v. Brewer, 511 F.2d 894 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 857 , 96 S.Ct. 108 , 46 L.Ed.2d 83 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Allen M. Anderson v. J. Leland Casscles, Superintendent of Great Meadow Correctional Facility
See, e. g., United States v. Goff, 509 F.2d 825 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 857 , 96 S.Ct. 109 , 46 L.Ed.2d 83 , 44 U.S.L.W. 3204 (1975); United States v. Jenkins, 496 F.2d 57 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 925 , 95 S.Ct. 1119 , 43 L.Ed.2d 394 (1975); United States v. Fernandez, 480 F.2d 726 (2d Cir. 1973); United States v. Test, 399 F.Supp. 683 (D.Colo.1975).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Vancier
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 74-6648.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1975.
Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (4)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.