discussed Cited "see" United States v. John Bolton Arrington See United States v. Ranney, 524 F.2d 830, 832 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 922 , 96 S.Ct. 1130 , 47 L.Ed.2d 330 (1976); United States v. Peterson, 475 F.2d 806, 810 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 846 , 94 S.Ct. 111 , 38 L.Ed.2d 93 (1973).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Wesley B. Dewalt See also United States v. Ranney, 524 F.2d 830, 832 (7th Cir.1975) (“[0]ne would hardly be surprised to learn that possession of a sawed-off shotgun is not an innocent act.”), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 922 , 96 S.Ct. 1130 , 47 L.Ed.2d 330 (1976); United States v. Herbert, 698 F.2d 981, 986 (9th Cir.) (“While a sawed-off shotgun ... may-be a dangerous device of such type as would alert one to the likelihood of regulation, we do not find that an ordinary firearm that is internally and undetectably modified to be automatic yet legal in appearance and markings falls within this category.”), c…