green
Positive treatment
4.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Jones, Unpublished Decision (4-13-1998)
See Stengel v. Belcher (1975 C.A. 6), 522 F.2d 438 , 445, cert. granted 425 U.S. 910 , cert. dismissed 429 U.S. 118 ; Masek v. Brandt (1971), 26 Ohio Misc. 178 , 180 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Mertens v. Hewitt Associates
See Scanwell Laboratories, Inc. v. Thomas, 521 F.2d 941, 949-50 (D.C.Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 910 , 96 S.Ct. 1507 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976) (to make out a claim for restitution “it is usually necessary for the plaintiff to show that he conferred the benefit”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mertens v. Hewitt Associates
See Scanwell Laboratories, Inc. v. Thomas, 521 F.2d 941, 949-50 (D.C.Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 910 , 96 S.Ct. 1507 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976) (to make out a claim for restitution "it is usually necessary for the plaintiff to show that he conferred the benefit").
cited
Cited "see"
Unidisco, Inc. v. Schattner
Accord Scanwell Laboratories, Inc. v. Thomas, 521 F.2d 941, 949 (D.C.Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 910 , 96 S.Ct. 1507 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
American Combustion, Inc. v. Minority Business Opportunity Commission
See Scanwell Laboratories, Inc. v. Thomas, 172 U.S.App.D.C. 281 , 285 & n.4, 521 F.2d 941 , 945 & n.4 (1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 910 , 96 S.Ct. 1507 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976); Northeast Construction Co. v. Romney, 157 U.S.App.D.C. 381, 388-89 , 485 F.2d 752 , 759-60 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Braun v. Northern Ohio Bank
See 516 F.2d 172 (2 Cir. 1975), cert. granted, 425 U.S. 910 , 96 S.Ct. 1505 , 47 L.Ed.2d 760 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca2 1976
See Chris-Craft Industries, Inc. v. Piper Aircraft Corp., 516 F.2d 172, 191 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. granted, 425 U.S. 910 , 96 S.Ct. 1505 , 47 L.Ed.2d 760 (1976); Kaufman v. Chase Manhattan Bank, National Association, 370 F.Supp. 279, 280-281 (S.D.N.Y.1974); N.Y.
discussed
Cited "see"
United Bank Ltd. v. Cosmic International Inc.
See Chris-Craft Industries, Inc. v. Piper Aircraft Corp., 516 F.2d 172, 191 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. granted, 425 U.S. 910 , 96 S.Ct. 1505 , 47 L.Ed.2d 760 (1976); Kaufman v. Chase Manhattan Bank, National Association, 370 F.Supp. 279, 280-281 (S.D.N.Y.1974); N.Y.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Technology for Communications International, Inc. v. Garrett
See also Scanwell Laboratories, Inc. v. Thomas, 521 F.2d 941 , 946 n. 5 (D.C.Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 910 , 96 S.Ct. 1507 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976); Kentron Hawaii, Limited v. Warner, 480 F.2d 1166 , 1169 (D.C.Cir.1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Thompson v. Dilger
See, e.g., Scanwell Laboratories, Inc. v. Thomas, 521 F.2d 941, 948 (D.C.Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 910 , 96 S.Ct. 1507 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976); Gowdy v. United States, 412 F.2d 525 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 960 , 90 S.Ct. 437 , 24 L.Ed.2d 425 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Breck v. Ulmer
See, e.g., Scanwell Laboratories v. Thomas, 521 F.2d 941, 948 (D.C.Cir.1975), cert, denied, 425 U.S. 910 , 96 S.Ct. 1507 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976) (discretionary function exception applies where contracting officer’s obligation not purely ministerial, notwithstanding possible abuse of discretion in ignoring bidding regulations); Lipka v. United States, 249 F.Supp. 213, 216 (N.D.N.Y.1965), aff'd on other grounds, 369 F.2d 288 (2d Cir.1966), cert, denied, 387 U.S. 935 , 87 S.Ct. 2061 , 18 L.Ed.2d 997 (1967) (“The award of a contract by government officials is the exercise of a discretionary fu…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
South African Marine Corp., Ltd. v. United States
See also Scanwell Laboratories, Inc. v. Thomas, 521 F.2d 941 (2nd Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 910 , 96 S.Ct. 1507 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976) (continuation of suit by original plaintiff/owner allowed after improper assignment rescinded and claim reverted to original owner).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Frazier v. Ward
Younger v. Gilmore, 404 U.S. 15 , 92 S.Ct. 250 , 30 L.Ed.2d 142 (1971); Procunier v. Martinez, 416 U.S. 396, 419-422 , 94 S.Ct. 1800 , 40 L.Ed.2d 224 (1974); Bryan v. Werner, 516 F.2d 233 (3d Cir. 1975); see also Smith v. Bounds, 538 F.2d *1372 541 (4th Cir. 1975), cert. gr., 425 U.S. 910 , 96 S.Ct. 1505 , 47 L.Ed.2d 760 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cargill, Inc. v. United States
See, e.g., Scanwell Laboratories, Inc. v. Thomas, 172 U.S.App.D.C. 281 , 521 F.2d 941, 947 (1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 910 , 96 S.Ct. 1507 , 47 L.Ed.2d 761 (1976) (FAA misrepresented that it would accept the most competitive bid on defense contract); Redmond v. SEC, 518 F.2d 811 , 814-815 (7th Cir. 1975) (misrepresentation by government respecting honesty of a securities dealer); Fitch v. United States, 513 F.2d 1013, 1016 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 866 , 96 S.Ct. 127 , 46 L.Ed.2d 95 (1975) (wrongful misrepresentation of obligation to enter armed forces); Reamer v. United States, 45…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad
See also Chris-Craft Industries, Inc. v. Piper Aircraft Corp., 516 F.2d 172, 188 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. granted, 425 U.S. 910 , 96 S.Ct. 1505 , 47 L.Ed.2d 760 (1976). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca3 1976
See also Chris-Craft Industries, Inc. v. Piper Aircraft Corp., 516 F.2d 172, 188 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. granted, 425 U.S. 910 , 96 S.Ct. 1505 , 47 L.Ed.2d 760 (1976) 44 E. g., Girsh v. Jepson, 521 F.2d 153 , 156 & n.7 (3d Cir. 1975) 1 Brief for Appellees at 18 2 Lindy Bros., supra, at 116 3 See Majority Op. at ---- - ---- 4 The district court summarized the agreement as follows: (a) Dividends on the pledged shares are paid into an escrow account and used to the extent necessary to make interest payments due on the bonds under the Collateral Trust Indentures; (b) If adequate provision is made fo…
City of Philadelphia
v.
New Jersey
v.
New Jersey
No. 75-1150.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 5, 1976.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Appeal from Sup. Ct. N. J. Motion of National Solid Wastes Management Assn, for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Probable jurisdiction noted.