green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.5 score
“venue turns on whether any part of the crime was committed within the district, and the government need only prove venue by a preponderance of the evidence.”
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 29 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. David J. Lindsay and D.J. Lindsay, Inc., David J. Lindsay, Cross-Appellee
(2×)
But see United States v. Grant, 545 F.2d 1309 (2d Cir.1976) (jury convicted defendant of four drug-trafficking crimes and five § 924(c) violations where five firearms were strategically placed to protect narcotics cache stored at after-hours social club, but parties failed to raise issue of whether § 924(c) permitted multiple convictions for use of multiple firearms), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1103 , 97 S.Ct. 1130 , 51 L.Ed.2d 554 (1977).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Vasta
venue turns on whether any part of the crime was committed within the district, and the government need only prove venue by a preponderance of the evidence.
discussed
Cited "see"
ca3 1992
See United States v. Panebianco, 543 F.2d 447, 456-57 (2d Cir.1976) (entry in coconspirator's address book including nickname of other coconspirator offered as evidence of "additional transactional link" in conspiracy and not for truth of matter asserted), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1103 , 97 S.Ct. 1128 , 1129, 51 L.Ed.2d 553 (1977); United States v. Ruiz, 477 F.2d 918 -19 (2d Cir.) (per curiam) (slip of paper bearing nickname and telephone number of defendant found on person of alleged coconspirator admitted merely to support inference that defendant and coconspirator knew each other), cert. deni…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. McGlory
See United States v. Panebianco, 543 F.2d 447, 456-57 (2d Cir.1976) (entry in coconspirator’s address book including nickname of other coconspirator offered as evidence of “additional transactional link” in conspiracy and not for truth of matter asserted), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1103 , 97 S.Ct. 1128 , 1129, 51 L.Ed.2d 553 (1977); United States v. Ruiz, 477 F.2d 918-19 (2d Cir.) (per cu-riam) (slip of paper bearing nickname and telephone number of defendant found on person of alleged coconspirator^ admitted merely to support inference that defendant and coconspirator knew each other), cer…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Angelos Markopoulos
See United States v. Panebianco, 543 F.2d 447, 457 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1103 , 97 S.Ct. 1129 , 51 L.Ed.2d 553 (1977) (notebook entry not hearsay where mere existence of entry is probative).
examined
Cited "see"
Moncier v. State
(4×)
United States v. Moore, 580 F.2d 360, 362 (9th Cir.) cert. denied, 439 U.S. 970 , 99 S.Ct. 463 , 58 L.Ed. 430 (1978); See United States v. Grant, 545 F.2d 1309, 1312-13 (2d Cir.1976) cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1103 , 97 S.Ct. 1130 , 51 L.Ed.2d 554 (1977); United States v. Mason, 658 F.2d 1263, 1270-71 (9th Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Yvette Carson, Lemuel Mont, A/K/A \Lam
See United States v. Panebianco, 543 F.2d 447, 452-53 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1103 , 97 S.Ct. 1128 , 51 L.Ed.2d 533 (1977); United States v. Tramunti, 513 F.2d 1087, 1106-07 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975); United States v. Sperling, 506 F.2d 1323 (2d Cir.1974); United States v. Bynum, 485 F.2d 490, 495-97 (2d Cir.1973), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 417 U.S. 903 , 94 S.Ct. 2598 , 41 L.Ed.2d 209 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Martorano
(2×)
United States v. Martinez, 588 F.2d 495 (5th Cir. 1979); see, United States v. Grant, 545 F.2d 1309 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1103 , 97 S.Ct. 1130 , 51 L.Ed.2d 554 (1977) (keys to room); United States v. Giles, 536 F.2d 136 (6th Cir. 1976) (keys to suitcase).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Nunzio
(4×)
See United States v. Sand, 541 F.2d 1370 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1103 , 97 S.Ct. 1130 , 51 L.Ed.2d 553 (1976) (suggesting that in reviewing motion to reduce sentence, trial court examine the defendant's post-trial conduct); United States v. Ochs, 490 F.Supp. 1206 (S.D.N.Y. 1980) (commendable prison deportment is a factor not to be disregarded by a trial court in considering a motion for reduction of sentence).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ippolito
See United States v. Panebianco, 543 F.2d 447, 453 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1103 , 97 S.Ct. 1128 , 51 L.Ed.2d 553 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Paul Boyd, United States of America v. Danilo Zabala Artez A/K/A Chico Artez, United States of America v. George Clark
See United States v. Panebianco, 543 F.2d 447, 453 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1103 , 97 S.Ct. 1128 , 51 L.Ed.2d 553 (1977); cf. United States v. Cohen, 516 F.2d 1358, 1364 (8th Cir. 1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Norman Jackson v. Mamie B. Reese
See, Payne v. United States, 539 F.2d 443 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1103 , 97 S.Ct. 1131 , 51 L.Ed.2d 554 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ernest W. Shahid, Jr. v. Curtis C. Crawford
See United States v. Norton, 539 F.2d 1082, 1083 (5th Cir. 1976) (per curiam) (quoting Scarpa v. United States Board of Parole), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1103 , 97 S.Ct. 1129 , 51 L.Ed.2d 553 (1977); Brown v. Lundgren, 528 F.2d 1050, 1054 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 917 , 97 S.Ct. 308 , 50 L.Ed.2d 283 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard I. Katz and Richard M. Tilker
See United States v. Panebianco, 543 F.2d 447, 453-54 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1103 , 97 S.Ct. 1128 , 51 L.Ed.2d 553 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dale S. Bogus v. American Speech & Hearing Association
(2×)
See Cobb v. Aytch, 539 F.2d 297, 300 (3d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1103 , 97 S.Ct. 1130 , 51 L.Ed.2d 554 (1977); In re Glenn W.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John S. Wondrack, Jr.
(2×)
Wondrack now seeks to avoid application of the rule “that a sentence imposed by a federal district judge, if within statutory limits, is generally not subject to review,” United States v. Tucker, 404 U.S. 443, 447 , 92 S.Ct. 589, 591 , 30 L.Ed.2d 592 (1972); accord, United States v. Sand, 541 F.2d 1370, 1378 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1103 , 97 S.Ct. 1130 , 51 L.Ed.2d 553 (1977), by bringing his case within the exception recognized in United States v. Weston, 448 F.2d 626 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1061 , 92 S.Ct. 748 , 30 L.Ed.2d 749 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ricardo Morales, AKA \Ichi
Such an approach is analogous to the established rule that “arrest or incarceration may constitute a withdrawal from a conspiracy, [but] it does not follow that in every instance it must.” United States v. Agueci, 310 F.2d 817, 839 (2d Cir.1962), cert. denied, 372 U.S. 959 , 83 S.Ct. 1016 , 10 L.Ed.2d 12 (1963); see also United States v. Salameh, 152 F.3d 88, 150 (2d Cir.1998) (per curiam) (“Whether a conspirator’s imprisonment constitutes a withdrawal ‘must be decided by the jury in light of the length and location of the internment, the nature of the conspiracy, and any other avail…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gigante
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Panebianco, 543 F.2d 447, 454 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1103 , 97 S.Ct. 1128 , 51 L.Ed.2d 553 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. David Thai, Lan Ngoc Tran, Minh Do, Jimmy Nguyen, Hoang Huy Ngo, Quang Van Nguyen, and Lv Hong, A/K/A \l.v. Hong\""
See, e.g., United States v. Panebianco, 543 F.2d 447, 457 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1103 , 97 S.Ct. 1128 , 1129, 51 L.Ed.2d 553 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Larry J. Meeks
See also United States v. Panebianco, 543 F.2d 447 , 453 n. 4 (2d Cir.1976) (“As long as the second offense occurs after passage of the punishment-enhancing statute, ... there is no retroactivity problem.”), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1103 , 97 S.Ct. 1129 , 51 L.Ed.2d 553 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sequoia Books, Inc. v. Dallas Ingemunson, in His Capacity as State's Attorney of Kendall County, Illinois, and Kendall County, Illinois
As this Court has interpreted Gryger, it allows the government to subject a defendant to “an increased penalty for the offense which occurred after enactment” of the relevant statute, United States v. Karlin, 852 F.2d 968, 973-974 (1988) (emphasis added), certiorari denied, — U.S.-, 109 S.Ct. 1142 , 103 L.Ed.2d 202 ; see also United States v. Panebianco, 543 F.2d 447 , 453 n. 4 (2d Cir.1976) (“As long as the second offense occurs after passage of the punishment-enhancing statute, however, there is no re-troactivity problem, [citing Gryger].”), certiorari denied, 429 U.S. 1103 , 97 S.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Juan A. Acosta-Cazares
(2×)
See also United States v. Grant, 545 F.2d 1309 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1103 , 97 S.Ct. 1130 , 51 L.Ed.2d 554 (1977)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Conklin Wallace v. Robert Christensen
(2×)
Compare Calabro v. United States Board of Parole, 525 F.2d 660, 661 (5th Cir.1975), reh’g denied, 529 F.2d 1032 (1976) with United States v. Norton, 539 F.2d 1082, 1083 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1103 , 97 S.Ct. 1129 , 51 L.Ed.2d 533 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Roscoe Emory Dean, Jr., in Re United States of America
See, e.g., United States v. Norton, 539 F.2d 1082, 1083 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1103 , 97 S.Ct. 1129 , 51 L.Ed.2d 553 (1976); United States v. Mehrtens, 494 F.2d 1172, 1176 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 900 , 95 S.Ct. 182 , 42 L.Ed.2d 145 (1974). 21 Upon the authority of these cases, and applying the principles announced in Denson, we conclude that mandamus is the proper remedy in the instant case.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca3 1982
See also United States v. Norton, 539 F.2d 1082, 1083 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1103 , 97 S.Ct. 1129 , 51 L.Ed.2d 553 (1977); United States v. United States District Court, 509 F.2d at 1354.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ferri
See also United States v. Norton, 539 F.2d 1082, 1083 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1103 , 97 S.Ct. 1129 , 51 L.Ed.2d 553 (1977); United States v. United States District Court, 509 F.2d at 1354.
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sandor Regner
(4×)
See, e.g., United States v. Sand, 541 F.2d 1370, 1376-77 (9th Cir. 1976), cert, denied, 429 U.S. 1103 , 97 S.Ct. 1130 , 51 L.Ed.2d 553 (1977) (bank records admitted against criminal defendants).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Michael Warren Mason, United States of America v. William Casey Welsh, United States of America v. Mitchell Shields
(2×)
See also United States v. Grant, 545 F.2d 1309 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1103 , 97 S.Ct. 1130 , 51 L.Ed.2d 554 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bernard J. Coven and James F. O'COnnOr
See also United States v. Panebianco, 543 F.2d 447, 457 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1103 , 97 S.Ct. 1128 , 51 L.Ed.2d 553 (1977); United States v. Flynn, 216 F.2d 354, 372 (2d Cir. 1954), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 909 , 75 S.Ct. 295 , 99 L.Ed. 713 (1955).
Ives
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 76-5701.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1977.
Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.