green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
9.0 score
G Cite
cited 6× by 2 distinct cases ·
"[t]he failure to make a projection of future earnings of an acquired company in a merger proxy statement is not actionable under Rule 10b-5."
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“standing is not accorded to a plaintiff if his purchase or sale occurs before the alleged fraudulent conduct”
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 39 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Calvin Woodrow Barfield
But see United States v. Makris, 398 F.Supp. 507 (D.C.Tex.1975), aff’d, 535 F.2d 899 (5th Cir.1976), ce rt. denied, 430 U.S. 954 , 97 S.Ct. 1598 , 51 L.Ed.2d 803 (1977), in which the Fifth Circuit held that a criminal defendant did not have the right to be present at his competency hearing.
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Nichols
But see United States v. Makris, 535 F.2d 899 (5th Cir.1976), reh. den., 540 F.2d 1086 (5th Cir.1976), and cert. den., 430 U.S. 954 , 97 S.Ct. 1598 , 51 L.Ed.2d 803 (1977), reh. den., 431 U.S. 909 , 97 S.Ct. 1707 , 52 L.Ed.2d 394 (1977).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Sinay v. Lamson & Sessions Co.
standing is not accorded to a plaintiff if his purchase or sale occurs before the alleged fraudulent conduct
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Biechele v. Cedar Point, Inc.
he failure to make a projection of future earnings of an acquired company in a merger proxy statement is not actionable under rule 10b-5.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Biechele v. Cedar Point, Inc.
he failure to make a projection of future earnings of an acquired company in a merger proxy statement is not actionable under rule 10b-5.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
John Concordia v. J. Thomas Bendekovic, Jr., Lt. G. Simpson, Bruce Lee McCormick Leonard Leo Lanham
removability cannot be created by defendant pleading a counterclaim presenting a federal question under 28 u.s.c. 1331 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. McRae
(2×)
See United States v. Makris, 535 F.2d 899, 904 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 954 (1976) (two-and-one-half years between trial and retrospective competency hearing); Bruce v. Estelle, 536 F.2d 1051, 1057 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1053 (1977) (nine years between trial and retrospective competency hearing); Conner v. Wingo, 429 F.2d 630, 637 (6th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 921 (1972) (four-and-one-half years between trial and retrospective competency hearing).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thompson v. Commonwealth
(2×)
See United States v. Makris, 535 F.2d 899, 904-05 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 954 , 97 S.Ct. 1598 , 51 L.Ed.2d 803 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Michael K. Cowan v. State of Oklahoma Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
See United States v. Makris, 535 F.2d 899, 904 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 954 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Boltz v. State
(2×)
See United States v. Makris, 535 F.2d 899 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied 430 U.S. 954 , 97 S.Ct. 1598 , 51 L.Ed.2d 803 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Murray v. Hospital Corp. of America
See Marsh v. Armada Corp., 533 F.2d 978, 980 (6th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 954 , 97 S.Ct. 1598 , 51 L.Ed.2d 803 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
American Global Lines, Inc. v. United States
See Gercy v. United States, 540 F.2d 536, 539 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 954 , 97 S.Ct. 1599 , 51 L.Ed.2d 804 (1976); Gemp v. United States, 684 F.2d 404, 408 (6th Cir.1982); Bearce v. United States, 614 F.2d 556, 558-59 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. *786 837, 101 S.Ct. 112 , 66 L.Ed.2d 44 (1980); Canadian Transport Co. v. United States, 663 F.2d 1081, 1085 (D.C.Cir.1980); see also Eazor Express, Inc. v. United States, 611 F.Supp. 197, 202 (E.D.N.Y.1985); In re Ohio River Disaster Litigation, 579 F.Supp. 1273, 1278-79 (S.D.Ohio 1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bill Edward Sturgis v. Robert Goldsmith
(2×)
See United States v. Makris, 398 F.Supp. 507, 509-11 (S.D.Tex.1975), aff'd, 535 F.2d 899 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 954 , 97 S.Ct. 1598 , 51 L.Ed.2d 803 (1977) (Makris).
cited
Cited "see"
Platsis v. EF Hutton & Co. Inc.
See Marsh v. Ar *1293 mada Corp., 533 F.2d 978, 982, n. 3 , (6th Cir.1976), cert. denied. 430 U.S. 954 , 97 S.Ct. 1598 , 51 L.Ed.2d 803 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Diaz v. State
See United States v. Makris, 5th Cir., 535 F.2d 899, 906 (1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 954 , 97 S.Ct. 1598 , 51 L.Ed.2d 803 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Manning v. State
(2×)
See United States v. Makris, 535 F.2d 899 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied 430 U.S. 954 , 97 S.Ct. 1598 , 51 L.Ed.2d 803 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Eazor Express, Inc. v. United States
See Gercey v. United States, 540 F.2d 536, 539 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 954 (1976); Canadian Transport Co. v. United States, 663 F.2d 1081, 1085 (D.C.Cir.1980); Bearce v. United States, 614 F.2d 556, 559 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 837 (1980); contra Lane v. United States, 529 F.2d 175,179 (4th Cir.1975); De Bardeleben Marine Corp. v. United States, 451 F.2d 140, 146, n. 15 (5th Cir.1971) (dictum).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ahern v. Gaussoin
See Marsh v. Armada Corp., 533 F.2d 978, 980 , (6th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 954 , 97 S.Ct. 1598 , 51 L.Ed.2d 803 (1977); In re Equity Funding Corp. Securities Litigation, 416 F.Supp. 161, 191 (C.D.Cal.1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. United States
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Gercey v. United States, 540 F.2d 536, 538 (1st Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 954 , 97 *888 S.Ct. 1599, 51 L.Ed.2d 804 (1977); W.
discussed
Cited "see"
Jackson P. Berry v. J. Glenn Bailey, Individually and as Sheriff of Columbia County, Florida
See Abbott v. Thet-ford, 529 F.2d 695, 707 (Gewin, J., dissenting) (5th Cir.) rev’d en banc, 534 F.2d 1101 (1976) (adopting the dissent of Gewin, J.), cert, denied, 430 U.S. 954 , 97 S.Ct. 1598 , 51 L.Ed.2d 804 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Koppel v. Wien
See Gulf & Western Industries, supra. Defendants complied with this statutory obligation by disclosing the conflicts. 7 In addition, the Second Circuit, citing Green v. Santa Fe Industries, Inc., 430 U.S. 954 , 97 S.Ct. 1597 , 51 L.Ed.2d 803 (1977), has stated “that violation of any such state-law fiduciary duties, including non-disclosure of conflicts of interest ... will not support a claim of constructive fraud under § 14(a) ____” Browning Debenture Holders’ Committee v. DASA Corp., 560 F.2d 1078, 1084 (2d Cir.1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Grand Jury Proceedings Witness Agosto
See Caesar v. Mountanos, 542 F.2d 1064, 1067-68 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 954 , 97 S.Ct. 1597 , 51 L.Ed.2d 804 (1977); In re Lifschutz, 2 Cal.3d 415, 431 , 85 Cal.Rptr. 829, 839-40 , 467 P.2d 557, 567-68 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wayne SMALLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EATONVILLE, CITY OF, a Public Entity and Nathaniel Vereen, Defendants-Appellees
See Abbott v. Thetford, 534 F.2d 1101 (5th Cir. 1976) (en banc) (adopting the dissenting panel opinion of Judge Gewin, 529 F.2d 695, 707-08 , which notes the “fundamental requirement of cooperation and confidence” between a judge and his chief probation officer), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 954 , 97 S.Ct. 1598 , 51 L.Ed.2d 804 (1977); Sprague v. Fitzpatrick, 546 F.2d 560, 564-65 (3d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 937 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977); Kannisto v. City and County of San Francisco, 541 F.2d 841, 844 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 1552 , 51 L.Ed.2…
cited
Cited "see"
Wilbur P. Bolius v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Department of Offender Rehabilitation, State of Florida
See United States v. Makris, 5 Cir. 1976, 535 F.2d 899, 904-05 , cert. denied, 1977, 430 U.S. 954 , 97 S.Ct. 1598 , 51 L.Ed.2d 803 , and cases cited therein.
cited
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,316 Ralph Nash and Otto G. Green v. Farmers New World Life Insurance Company and Farmers Group, Inc.
See Marsh v. Armada Corp., 533 F.2d 978, 984-86 (6th Cir. 1976), cert. den., 430 U.S. 954, 97 S.Ct. 1598 , 51 L.Ed.2d 803 (1977). 9 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Green v. City of Montgomery
See also Abbott v. Thetford, 534 F.2d 1101 (5th Cir.1976) (en banc), adopting panel dissent, 529 F.2d 695, 701-709 (1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 954 , 97 S.Ct. 1598 , 51 L.Ed.2d 804 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ferrell v. Brick
See, e.g., Caesar v. Mountanos, 542 F.2d 1064 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 954 , 97 S.Ct. 1598 , 51 L.Ed.2d 804 (1977) (California Evidence Code § 1016 providing for psychotherapist-patient privilege is waived under the “patient-litigation” exception); Lowe, 101 F.R.D. at 298-99 ; Miller, 81 F.R.D. at 745 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Kyle
See e.g., Caesar v. Mountanos, 542 F.2d 1064, 1064, 1067-1068 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 954 , 97 S.Ct. 1598 , 51 L.Ed.2d 804 (1977); Hawaii Psychiatric Soc.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Olympia Sauna Compania Naviera, S.A. v. United States
See also Gercey v. United States, 540 F.2d 536 (1st Cir.1976) cert. denied, 430 U.S. 954 , 97 S.Ct. 1599 , 51 L.Ed.2d 804 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mutual of Omaha Insurance v. American National Bank & Trust Co.
See, e.g., Caesar v. Mountanos, 542 F.2d 1064 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 954 , 97 S.Ct. 1598 , 51 L.Ed.2d 804 (1977); Robinson v. Magovern, 83 F.R.D. 79, 91 (W.D.Pa.1979); 2 Weinstein’s Evidence § 504, et seq. (1982 & Supp. 1984); Slovenko, Psychiatry and a Second Look at the Medical Privilege, 6 Wayne L.Rev. 175 (1960). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Haley
(2×)
See, e.g., Abbott v. Thetford, 534 F.2d 1101 (en banc), rev’g and adopting dissenting opinion, 529 F.2d 695 (5th Cir.1976), ce rt. denied, 430 U.S. 954 , 97 S.Ct. 1598 , 51 L.Ed.2d 804 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re All Maine Asbestos Litigation
See, e.g., Gercey v. United States, 540 F.2d 536, 539 (1st Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 954 , 97 S.Ct. 1599 , 51 L.Ed.2d 804 (1977); Gelley v. Astra Pharmaceutical Products, Inc,, 610 F.2d 558, 562-63 (8th Cir.1979). 20 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Franzen
The Illinois Supreme Court has since held that due process requires the State to bear the burden of proving fitness once the defendant has raised a bona fide doubt, People v. McCullum, 66 Ill.2d 306 , 5 Ill.Dec. 836 , 362 N.E.2d 307 (1977), and the Third Circuit also has held that "(e)vidence showing competency must be more persuasive than that showing incompetency." United States v. DiGilio, 538 F.2d 972, 988 (3d Cir. 1976), certiorari denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 733 , 50 L.Ed.2d 749 ; see also United States v. Makris, 535 F.2d 899, 906 (5th Cir. 1976), certiorari denied, 430 U.S. 954 , …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States ex rel. Bilyew v. Franzen
The Illinois Supreme Court has since held that due process requires the State to bear the burden of proving fitness once the defendant has raised a bona fide doubt, People v. McCullum, 66 Ill.2d 306 , 5 Ill.Dec. 836 , 362 N.E.2d 307 (1977), and the Third Circuit also has held that “[e]vidence showing competency must be more persuasive than that showing incompetency.” United States v. DiGilio, 538 F.2d 972, 988 (3d Cir. 1976), certiorari denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 733 , 50 L.Ed.2d 749 ; see also United States v. Makris, 535 F.2d 899, 906 (5th Cir. 1976), certiorari denied, 430 U.S. 95…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sondra Weisbrod v. Virginia Donigan, Individually and as an Employee of the State of Florida, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services
Compare Abbott v. Thetford, 534 F.2d 1101 (5th Cir.) (en banc), rev’g and adopting dissenting opinion, 529 F.2d 695, 701 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 954 , 97 S.Ct. 1598 , 51 L.Ed.2d 804 (1977), and Smith v. United States, 502 F.2d 512 (5th Cir. 1974) with Lewis v. Spencer, 490 F.2d 93 (5th Cir. 1974), and Duke v. North Texas State Univ., 469 F.2d 829 (5th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 412 U.S. 932 , 93 S.Ct. 2760 , 37 L.Ed.2d 160 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Haynes v. Anderson & Strudwick, Inc.
See, e.g., Marsh v. Armada Corp., 533 F.2d 978, 981-82 (6th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 954 , 97 S.Ct. 1598 , 51 L.Ed.2d 803 (1977); Herm v. Stafford, 461 F.Supp. 502, 505 (W.D.Ky.1978); Ingenito v. Bermec Corp., 441 F.Supp. 525, 545 (S.D.N.Y.1977); Gaudin v. K.D.I.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Sawczyk v. United States Coast Guard
See also Gercey v. United States, 540 F.2d 536, 537 (1st Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 954 , 97 S.Ct. 1599 , 51 L.Ed.2d 804 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,346 Robert L. Alley, Cross-Appellee v. Louis Miramon, Jr., Cross-Appellants
See, e. g., Marsh v. Armada Corp., 6 Cir. 1976, 533 F.2d 978, 981-82 , cert. denied, 1977, 430 U.S. 954 , 97 S.Ct. 1598 , 51 L.Ed.2d 803 (citing Vine with approval and holding merger exchange a sale under Blue Chip); Valente v. PepsiCo, Inc., D.Del.1978, 454 F.Supp. 1228 , 1237 n.10; Morales v. Gould Investors Trust, S.D.N.Y.1977, 445 F.Supp. 1144, 1150 , aff'd mem., 2 Cir. 1978, 578 F.2d 1369 ; Niederhoffer, Cross & Zeckhauser, Inc. v. Telstat Systems Inc., S.D.N.Y.1977, 436 F.Supp. 180 , 184 & n.6; Clinton Hudson & Sons v. Lehigh Valley Coop.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,861 Gerald Mansbach v. Prescott, Ball & Turben
See also Marsh v. Armada Corp., 533 F.2d 978, 983 (6th Cir. 1976), cert. den. 430 U.S. 954 , 97 S.Ct. 1598 , 51 L.Ed.2d 803 (1977), decided six days after Hochfelder , equating Rule 10b-5 with fraud but not subjecting it to the limitations of common law fraud. 30 .
Wallace, Director of Food and Agriculture of California
v.
Rath Packing Co.
v.
Rath Packing Co.
No. 75-1052.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 4, 1977.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.