green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.0 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1986 ·
…the interstate agreement on detainers does not apply to a person who is imprisoned awaiting disposition of pending charges and who has not been sentenced to a term of imprisonment
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Burl Glasgow
(2×)
the interstate agreement on detainers does not apply to a person who is imprisoned awaiting disposition of pending charges and who has not been sentenced to a term of imprisonment
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Smith
(2×)
Freve v. State, 160 Me. 179 , 200 A.2d 847 (1964); accord United States v. Krzyske, 836 F.2d 1013, 1019 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 832 , 109 S.Ct. 89 , 102 L.Ed.2d 66 (1988) (“The burden is on the defendant to demonstrate financial inability in order to obtain counsel.”) (quoting United States v. Peister, 631 F.2d 658, 662 (10th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1126 , 101 S.Ct. 945 , 67 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981) (citing United States v. Ellsworth, 547 F.2d 1096 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 2636 , 53 L.Ed.2d 247 (1977))); State v. DuPaul, 527 N.W.2d 238, 241 (N.D.…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Garcia
See United States v. Jenkins, 544 F.2d 180, 181 (4th Cir. 1976) (per curiam) (reviewing Government's comment that its wit- ness was "uncontradicted" in context of closing argument and finding no plain error where defendant failed to object to comment and dis- trict court instructed jury to draw no inferences from defendant's fail- ure to testify), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 931 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gualberto Garcia, United States of America v. Jorge Morera, United States of America v. Marshall Allen Slater
See United States v. Jenkins, 544 F.2d 180, 181 (4th Cir.1976) (per curiam) (reviewing Government's comment that its witness was "uncontradicted" in context of closing argument and finding no plain error where defendant failed to object to comment and district court instructed jury to draw no inferences from defendant's failure to testify), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 931 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Valiant-Bey v. Morris
(2×)
See Carpenter v. South Dakota, 536 F.2d 759, 763 (8th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 2636 , 53 L.Ed.2d 246 (1977); see also Moore v. Clarke, 821 F.2d at 519 (racial discrimination). 6 Censorship of prisoner mail is constitutionally justified if (1) the regulation or practice furthers "an important or substantial governmental interest unrelated to the suppression of expression," such as institutional security, and (2) "the limitation of First Amendment freedoms must be no greater than is necessary or essential to the protection of the particular governmental interest involved.…
discussed
Cited "see"
Valiant-Bey v. Morris
(2×)
See Carpenter v. South Dakota, 536 F.2d 759, 763 (8th Cir.1976), cert, denied, 431 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 2636 , 53 L;Ed.2d 246 (1977); see also Moore v. Clarke, 821 F.2d at 519 (racial discrimination).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James A. Brien, United States of America v. Thomas Labus, United States of America v. Robert Ralph Zolla, United States of America v. Michael Shuster, United States of America v. Stephen Buzzi
See United States v. Quicksey, 525 F.2d 337, 341 (4th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 2637 , 53 L.Ed.2d 247 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Brien
See United States v. Quicksey, 525 F.2d 337, 341 (4th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 2637 , 53 L.Ed.2d 247 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Boone
(2×)
Accord, United States v. Roberts, 548 F. 2d 665, 670-671 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U. S. 931 , 97 S. Ct. 2636 , 53 L.Ed.2d 246 (1977); United States v. Harris, supra at 612-613.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dewayne F. Titus
(2×)
See United States v. Ellsworth, 547 F.2d 1096, 1097-98 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 2636 , 53 L.Ed.2d 247 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Montgomery
See also United States v. Roberts, 548 F.2d 665, 667 (6th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 931 (1977). {¶ 27} The testimony that Montgomery complains of was not presented to paint him and other members of the group as reckless, gun toting teenagers who acted in conformity with that description, but to "provid[e] the jury with insight into relevant issues[,] . . . meaning to . . . [subsequent] testimony[,] and context to the events leading to the charged offenses." Id. at ¶ 92, compare State v. Thomas, 2017-Ohio-8011 (holding that defendant's collection of "full Rambo combat knives" that wa…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Forrest
It is clear, under our caselaw, that the Agreement applies only to “prisoners who have begun serving their [state] sentence and not to [state] pre-trial detainees.” United States v. Wilson, 27 F.3d 1126, 1130 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 976 (1994); see also United States v. Roberts, 548 F.2d 665, 670-71 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 931 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Antonio L. Forrest, Defendant-Appellee/cross-Appellant
(2×)
It is clear, under our caselaw, that the Agreement applies only to “prisoners who have begun serving their [state] sentence and not to [state] pre-trial detainees.” United States v. Wilson, 27 F.3d 1126, 1130 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 976 , 115 S.Ct. 452 , 130 L.Ed.2d 361 (1994); see also United States v. Roberts, 548 F.2d 665, 670-71 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 2636 , 53 L.Ed.2d 246 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Salemme
(2×)
See also United States v. Ellsworth, 547 F.2d 1096, 1097 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 2636 , 53 L.Ed.2d 247 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Raftopolous
Such a choice is constitutionally impermissible” (United States v Anderson, supra, at 840-841; see also, United States v Ellsworth, 547 F2d 1096 [9th Cir 1976], cert denied 431 US 931 [1977]).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gerald Raynard Scott
United States v. Whitehead, 618 F.2d 523, 527 (4th Cir.1980) (citation omitted) (emphasis in original); see also United States v. Jenkins, 544 F.2d 180, 180-81 (4th Cir.1976) (statements that evidence was "uncontradicted" not improper), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 931 (1977).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Long
(4×)
See, e.g., United States v. Roberts, 548 F. 2d 665, 670 (6th Cir.) (where prisoner was confined in a holding facility and awaiting sentencing, court held that I.A.D. was inapplicable because prisoner was "not serving a term of imprisonment" according to statutory language), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 2636 , 53 L.Ed. 2d 246 (1977); State v. Thompson, 19 Ohio App. 3d 261, 264 , 483 N.E. 2d 1207, 1210 (1984) ("It is clear from the [statutory] language quoted that the party states did not intend to include discharged prisoners within the statutory scheme.") Our Appellate Division has ad…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Carpenter
v.
South Dakota
v.
South Dakota
No. 76-6301.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 23, 1977.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (2)
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.