green
Positive treatment
1.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "but see"
Commonwealth v. Thurber
But see People v. Condley, 69 Cal. App. 3d 999, 1011-1013 , cert, denied, 434 U.S. 988 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
St. James Hospital v. Heckler
See Home Box Office, Inc. v. FCC, 567 F.2d 9, 35-36 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 829 , 98 S.Ct. 111 , 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977), reh. denied, 434 U.S. 988 , 98 S.Ct. 621 , 54 L.Ed.2d 484 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Pete Mitchell
See People v. Condley, 69 Cal.App.3d 999, 1011-12 , 138 Cal.Rptr. 515, 521-22 , cert. denied, 434 U.S. 988 , 98 S.Ct. 619 , 54 L.Ed.2d 483 (1977); Perkins, The Doctrine of Coercion, 19 Iowa L.Rev. 507 n. 1 (1934). 3 However, others contend that duress does not preclude a finding of the voluntariness required for criminal responsibility because the defendant, though motivated by an impulse to save himself or another from serious harm, nonetheless forms an intention to commit a crime and chooses to act upon that intention.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Robinson
Compare People v. Condley, 69 Cal. App. 3d 999, 1011-1013 , cert, denied, 434 U.S. 988 (1977) (contrasts duress with “limited defense of necessity” to prison escape; concludes that “duress” negates mens rea, but that “necessity” does not).
Condley
v.
California
v.
California
No. 77-5610.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 5, 1977.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.