green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.2 score
“suspicion, conjecture and speculation are not enough.... the purported fact issue must be actual rather than theoretical, real rather than imaginary.”
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Cummiskey v. Chandris, S.A.
suspicion, conjecture and speculation are not enough.... the purported fact issue must be actual rather than theoretical, real rather than imaginary.
discussed
Cited "see"
Allard v. Arthur Andersen & Co.(USA)
See Miller v. New York Produce Exch., 550 F.2d 762, 768 (2d Cir.) (“where a defendant’s only sin is its failure to prevent transgressions by the plaintiff, no benefit flows to the public from rewarding the transgressor”), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 68 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977); In re Crazy Eddie Secs.
discussed
Cited "see"
United Steelworkers v. North Star Steel Co.
See Coar v. Kazimir, 990 F.2d 1413, 1419-20 (3d Cir.1993), petition for cert. filed, 62 U.S.L.W. 3060 (U.S. Jul. 9, 1993) (No. 93-62); accord United States v. Tighe, 551 F.2d 18, 20 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 68 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United Steelworkers Of America, Afl-Cio-Clc v. North Star Steel Company, Inc.
See Coar v. Kazimir, 990 F.2d 1413, 1419-20 (3d Cir.1993), petition for cert. filed, 62 U.S.L.W. 3060 (U.S. Jul. 9, 1993) (No. 93-62); accord United States v. Tighe, 551 F.2d 18, 20 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 68 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Oppenheimer-Palmieri Fund, L.P. v. Peat Marwick Main & Co.
See Cenco, Inc. v. Siedman & Seidman, 686 F.2d 449 , 453 (7th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 177 , 74 L.Ed.2d 145 (1982). “[W]here a defendant’s only sin is its failure to prevent transgressions by the plaintiff, no benefit flows to the public from rewarding the transgressor.” Miller v. New York Produce Exchange, 550 F.2d 762, 568 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 68 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Crazy Eddie Securities Litigation
See Cenco, Inc. v. Siedman & Seidman, 686 F.2d 449 , 453 (7th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 177 , 74 L.Ed.2d 145 (1982). "[W]here a defendant's only sin is its failure to prevent transgressions by the plaintiff, no benefit flows to the public from rewarding the transgressor." Miller v. New York Produce Exchange, 550 F.2d 762, 568 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 68 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
CEPA Consulting, Ltd. v. King Main Hurdman (In Re Wedtech Securities Litigation)
See Miller v. New York Produce Exch., 550 F.2d 762, 767-68 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 68 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977); Eisenberg v. Feiner, 100 B.R. 157, 173 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.1989); Hays and Co. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 885 F.2d 1149, 1154-55 (3d Cir.1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Berg v. United States
See Miller v. New York Produce Exch., 550 F.2d 762, 769 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 68 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977) (a challenge to a district court order dismissing a claim against a corporation for the actions of its employees is moot after a verdict is delivered in favor of the employees).
discussed
Cited "see"
Berg v. United States
See Miller v. New York Produce Exch., 550 F.2d 762, 769 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 68 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977) (a challenge to a district court order dismissing a claim against a corporation for the actions of its employees is moot after a verdict is delivered in favor of the employees).
discussed
Cited "see"
Louis J. Bornstein v. Richard E. Poulos, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Blier Cedar Company, Inc.
See Miller v. New *447 York Produce Exchange, 550 F.2d 762, 767-68 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 68 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977); 4A Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 70.28, at 385 (14th ed. 1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hutchison Bros. Excavating Co. v. District of Columbia
See District of Columbia v. North Washington Neighbors, Inc., 367 A.2d 143, 147 (D.C.1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 68 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977) (agency not required to initiate rulemaking when resulting rules merely describe controlling provisions); see also Metzenbaum v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 219 U.S.App.D.C. 57, 66 , 675 F.2d 1282, 1291 (1982) (rulemaking not necessary when statutory standard is precise; agency given no discretion to deviate from precise course established by statute).
discussed
Cited "see"
City of Cleveland v. The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company
(2×)
See Miller v. New York Produce Exchange, 550 F.2d 762, 767 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 68 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Everett, George
“Distribute” is defined to mean “deliver,” 21 U.S.C. § 802 (11) (1976), and “deliver” is defined as “the actual, constructive, or attempted transfer of a controlled substance.” Id. at § 802(8); see United States v. Tighe, 551 F.2d 18, 20 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 68 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
George Lambert, and Third-Party v. Morania Oil Tanker Corp., and Third-Party v. Lonnie James Pfaudler, Third-Party
See Miller v. New York Produce Exchange, 550 F.2d 762, 769 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 68 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Spivey v. Barry
See D.C. v. North Washington Neighbors, Inc., 367 A.2d 143 (D.C.1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 68 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977); Junghans v. Dept, of Human Resources, 289 A.2d 17, 23 (D.C.1972). 13.
discussed
Cited "see"
P. J. Taggares Co. v. New York Mercantile Exchange
(2×)
Id. at 820 ; accord, Miller v. New York Produce Exchange, 550 F.2d 762, 767 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 68 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977); cf. Lagorio v. Board of Trade, 529 F.2d 1290 , 1291 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 3171 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1187 (1976) (rejecting challenge to Board’s action in suspending trading in futures contracts but excepting new sales for actual delivery). 23 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Durkin v. Shea
When seeking to avoid a preferential transfer, however, the trustee is not asserting a cause of action belonging to the debtor_”); see also Miller v. New York Produce Exchange, 550 F.2d 762, 767-768 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 68 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Mormels v. Girofinance, S. A.
See, e.g., Miller v. New York Produce Exchange, 550 F.2d 762 , 769 n.4 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 68 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977); CFTC v. J.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Neil Leist, Philip Smith and Incomco v. John Richard Simplot, J. R. Simplot & Co., Simplot Products Co., Inc., Simplot Industries, Inc., Simtag Farms, Inc., Peter J. Taggares, P. J. Taggares & Co., Henry A. Pollack, Harvey B. Pollack, Harvey B. Pollack Company, Gerald Rafferty, Pressner Trading Corp., Benjamin Pressner, Stephen Sundheimer, Jules Nordlight, Edelstein & Co., Inc., Charles Edelstein, Robert Edelstein, Murial Edelstein, Meierfeld & Company, Inc., Gilbert Meierfeld, David Meierfeld, Robert Reardon, F. J. Reardon, Inc., Harold Collins, Caspar Mayerson, Lynnewood Exporting Company, Alex Sinclair, Manning Stoller, Hornblower & Weeks-Hemphill, Noyes Inc., Mfx Commodities, Inc., Donald Silver, Duane South, Kenneth Ramm, a & B Farming Inc., Hugh Glenn, Gearheart Farming, Inc., Edward McKay \John\" Humphreys
See, e.g., Miller v. New York Produce Exchange, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 68 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977); Master Commodities, Inc. v. Texas Cattle Management Co., 586 F.2d 1352 (10 Cir. 1978); Moody v. Bache & Co., Inc., 570 F.2d 523 (5 Cir. 1978); P.J.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Leist v. Simplot
See, e.g., Miller v. New York Produce Exchange, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 68 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977); Master Commodities, Inc. v. Texas Cattle Management Co., 586 F.2d 1352 (10 Cir. 1978); Moody v. Bache & Co., Inc., 570 F.2d 523 (5 Cir. 1978); P.J.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Skinner
v.
Mallard Truck Lines, Inc.
v.
Mallard Truck Lines, Inc.
No. 76-1593.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1977.
Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)
Ct. App. La., 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.