King v. United States, 440 U.S. 973 (1979). · Go Syfert
Search
King v. United States, 440 U.S. 973 (1979). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
138 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 33 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Antonio Garcia-Pimentel (ca9, 1994-07-13)
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979 2002 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Antonio Garcia-Pimentel
9th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Goldberg, 582 F.2d 483, 488 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 973 (1979) (Under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), the government must comply with a defendant's specific request for information "where the evidence is material to either guilt or punishment.").
cited Cited "see" Himes v. Sullivan
W.D.N.Y. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Benton v. Rhodes, 586 F.2d 1, 3 (6th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 973 , 99 S.Ct. 1539 , 59 L.Ed.2d 791 (1979).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Nick Cloyd Enterline (2×)
8th Cir. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. King, 590 F.2d 253, 255 (8th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 973 , 99 S.Ct. 1538 , 59 L.Ed.2d 790 (1979).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Candage (2×)
Me. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. King, 590 F.2d 253, 257 (8th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 973 , 99 S.Ct. 1538 , 59 L.Ed.2d 790 (1979); United States v. Lewis, 565 F.2d 1248, 1250-53 (2d Cir.1977); United States v. Hudson, 564 F.2d 1377, 1379 (9th Cir.1977).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Marrero
La. Ct. App. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Matthews, 589 F.2d 442, 445 (9th Cir.1978), ce rt. denied, 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1538 , 59 L.Ed.2d 790 (1979); United States v. Crippen, 570 F.2d 535, 538 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1069 , 99 S.Ct. 837 , 59 L.Ed.2d 34 (1979); United States v. Williams, 552 F.2d 226, 229 (8th Cir.1977); United States v. Slawik, 548 F.2d 75, 86 (3d Cir.1977); United States v. Corr, 543 F.2d 1042, 1049 (2d Cir.1976); United States v. Williams, 536 F.2d 1202, 1205 (7th Cir.1976); United States v. Long, 534 F.2d 1097, 1101 (3d Cir.1976); United States v. Parr, 516 F.2d 458, 470 (5…
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Harvey R. Johnson (2×)
9th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Goldberg, 582 F.2d 483, 486 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 973 , 99 S.Ct. 1538 , 59 L.Ed.2d 790 (1979). 6.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. William Shaffer (2×)
9th Cir. · 1986 · signal: accord · confidence high
Under the second standard, the prosecutor’s failure to respond to a defendant’s request for specific information will result in a new trial if the suppressed evidence “might have affected the outcome of the trial.” Id. at 104 , 96 S.Ct. at 2398 ; accord, United States v. Goldberg, 582 F.2d 483 , *688 489 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 973 , 99 S.Ct. 1538 , 59 L.Ed.2d 790 (1979) (reasonable possibility that error materially affected the verdict).
discussed Cited "see" UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Harold S. McCLINTOCK, Defendant-Appellant (2×)
9th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
Compare United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97, 107 , 96 S.Ct. 2392, 2399 , 49 L.Ed.2d 342 (1976) (general request), with Brady, 373 U.S. at 87 , 83 S.Ct. at 1196 (specific request); see United States v. Goldberg, 582 F.2d 483, 488-90 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 973 , 99 S.Ct. 1538 , 59 L.Ed.2d 790 (1979).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Greichunos (2×)
N.D. Ill. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Goldberg, 582 F.2d 483, 490 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 973 , 99 S.Ct. 1538 , 59 L.Ed.2d 790 (1979).
discussed Cited "see" Nadene Garrett v. Sammie Lynn Puett, Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Human Services
6th Cir. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Benton v. Rhodes, 586 F.2d 1, 2-3 (6th Cir.1978), cert. denied sub. nom., Wisebaker v. Rhodes, 440 U.S. 973 , 99 S.Ct. 1539 , 59 L.Ed.2d 791 (1979); Palmer v. Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc., 479 F.2d 153, 166-67 (6th Cir.1973); Biggs v. C.I.R., 440 F.2d 1 , 3 (6th Cir.1971); see also Turner v. Walsh, 435 F.Supp. 707, 713 (W.D.Mo.1977), aff’d, 574 F.2d 456 (8th Cir.1978); Daniel v. Rappeport, LR-C-81-687 (E.D.Ark., Nov. 9, 1981).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Gomez (2×)
usarmymilrev · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Goldberg, 582 F.2d 483 (9th Cir.1978) (witness’s notes not covered by Jencks Act), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 973 , 99 S.Ct. 1538 , 59 L.Ed.2d 790 (1979); United States v. Trevino, supra (document in possession of probation officer not covered), reh’g denied, 562 F.2d 1258 (5th Cir.1977); United States v. Dansker, 537 F.2d 40 (3d Cir.1976) (statements in the probation report not covered), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 732 , 50 L.Ed.2d 748 (1977); Beavers v. United States, 351 F.2d 507 (9th Cir.1965) (tape recording in the hands of state authorities not covered); U…
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Dudley Bell
5th Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Matthews, 589 F.2d 442, 445 (9th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1538 , 59 L.Ed.2d 790 (1979); United States v. Crippen, 570 F.2d 535, 538 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1069 , 99 S.Ct. 837 , 59 L.Ed.2d 34 (1979); United States v. Williams, 552 F.2d 226, 229 (8th Cir. 1977); United States v. Slawik, 548 F.2d 75, 86 (3d Cir. 1977); United States v. Corr, 543 F.2d 1042, 1049 (2d Cir. 1976); United States v. Williams, 536 F.2d 1202, 1205 (7th Cir. 1976); United States v. Long, 534 F.2d 1097, 1101 (3d Cir. 1976); United States v. Parr, 516 F.2d 458, …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Schneider (2×)
N.D. Iowa · 2001 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id.; see also United States v. King, 590 F.2d 253, 256 (8th Cir.1978), ce rt. denied, 440 U.S. 973 , 99 S.Ct. 1538 , 59 L.Ed.2d 790 (1979) (explaining that where "prosecutorial overreaching” is present the interests protected by the Double Jeopardy Clause outweigh society's interest in conducting a second trial ending in acquittal or conviction) (citations omitted).
examined Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Manuel Bobadilla-Lopez (4×)
9th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Bernard, 623 F.2d at 557-58 ; Spencer, 618 F.2d at 606-07 ; see also United States v. Goldberg, 582 F.2d 483 , 487-88 & n. 2 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 973 , 99 S.Ct. 1538 , 59 L.Ed.2d 790 (1979).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Willie Eddie Warhop (2×)
10th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see also · confidence low
Cases interpreting this latter standard have held that a new. trial is required “if there was a ‘reasonable possibility’ that the undisclosed evidence would have materially affected the verdict.” Chavis v. North Carolina, 637 F.2d 213 , 223 (4th Cir.1980); see also United States v. Goldberg, 582 F.2d 483, 489 (9th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 973 , 99 S.Ct. 1538 , 59 L.Ed.2d 790 (1979).
King
v.
United States
No. 78-1353.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 26, 1979.
440 U.S. 973
Published

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.