green
Positive treatment
7.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers.
examined
Cited "see"
David A. Clarke v. United States
(4×)
See Memorandum for the United States in Opposition at 4 & n. 4, Local 102, Int'l Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. United States, 439 U.S. 1070 , 99 S.Ct. 840 , 59 L.Ed.2d 36 (1979) (No. 78-633) 6 As the Court's practice of selective vacatur demonstrates, mootness of the underlying controversy does not prevent the losing party from seeking certiorari for the purpose of securing vacatur.
discussed
Cited "see"
Carlos Alberto Ballbe v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
(2×)
See Forstner v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 579 F.2d 506, 508 (9th Cir.1978), ce rt. denied, 439 U.S. 1071 , 99 S.Ct. 841 , 59 L.Ed.2d 36 (1979); Yam Sang Kwai v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 411 F.2d 683, 687-688 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 877 , 90 S.Ct. 148 , 24 L.Ed.2d 135 (1969); Rassano v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 377 F.2d 971 (7th Cir.1966).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Frederick Ines Gordon, United States of America v. Edward Loeswick
See United States v. Dipp, 581 F.2d 1323 , 1328 *1404 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1071 , 99 S.Ct. 841 , 59 L.Ed.2d 37 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Humane Society of the United States v. Clark
(2×)
See Environmental Defense Fund v. Costle, 79 F.R.D. 235, 243 (D.D.C.), aff'd, 12 E.R.C. 1255 (D.C.Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1071 , 99 S.Ct. 840 , 59 L.Ed.2d 36 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. CBS, Inc.
See SEC v. Arthur Young & Co., 584 F.2d 1018, 1033-34 (D.C.Cir.1978), cer t. denied, 439 U.S. 1071 , 99 S.Ct. 841 , 59 L.Ed.2d 37 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Walker County Wrecker & Storage Ass'n v. Walker County
See Foster v. Maryland State Savings and Loan Association, 590 F.2d 928 (D.C.Cir.1978), ce rt. denied 439 U.S. 1071 , 99 S.Ct. 842 , 59 L.Ed.2d 37 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Amis v. Gulf Abstract & Title, Inc.
See Foster v. Maryland State Savings & Loan Association, 590 F.2d 928 (D.C.Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1071 , 99 S.Ct. 842 , 59 L.Ed.2d 37 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Southwestern Bank & Trust Co.
See SEC v. Arthur Young & Co., 584 F.2d 1018, 1033 (D.C.Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1071 , 99 S.Ct. .841, 59 L.Ed.2d 37 (1979); United States v. Continental Bank & Trust Co., 503 F.2d 45, 48 (10th Cir.1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Southwestern Bank And Trust Co.
See SEC v. Arthur Young & Co., 584 F.2d 1018, 1033 (D.C.Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1071 , 99 S.Ct. 841 , 59 L.Ed.2d 37 (1979); United States v. Continental Bank & Trust Co., 503 F.2d 45, 48 (10th Cir.1974).
examined
Cited "see"
Leonel Morales-Alvarado v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
(4×)
See Forstner v. INS, 579 F.2d 506, 508 (9th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1071 , 99 S.Ct. 841 , 59 L.Ed.2d 36 (1979); Marino v. INS, supra, 537 F.2d at 691-92 ; Will v. INS, supra, 447 F.2d at 523-33 .
cited
Cited "see"
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Kingsley
See Securities and Exchange Commission v. Arthur Young & Co., 190 U.S. App.D.C. 37, 48, 584 F.2d 1018, 1029 (1978), cert. den. 439 U.S. 1071 , 99 S.Ct. 841 , 59 L.Ed.2d 37 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
cadc 1980
See SEC v. Arthur Young & Co., 584 F.2d 1018, 1022-1024 (D.C.Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1071 , 99 S.Ct. 841 , 59 L.Ed.2d 37 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Usery v. Brandel
See Fleming v. Citizens for Albemarle, Inc., 577 F.2d 236, 238 (4th Cir. 1978), cert, denied, 439 U.S. 1071 , 99 S.Ct. 842 , 59 L.Ed.2d 37 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Dresser Industries, Inc.
See SEC v. Arthur Young & Co., 584 F.2d 1018, 1022-1024 (D.C.Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1071 , 99 S.Ct. 841 , 59 L.Ed.2d 37 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Touche Ross & Co. v. Securities & Exchange Commission
See SEC v. Arthur Young & Co., 584 F.2d 1018 ,1025 n.51 (D.C.Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1071 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Touche Ross & Co. v. Sec
See SEC v. Arthur Young & Co., 584 F.2d 1018 , 1025 n.51 (D.C.Cir.1978), Cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1071 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Adair v. Rose Law Firm
See also SEC v. Arthur Young & Co., 684 F.2d 1018 , 1032-33 (D.C.Cir.1978), cert. denied 439 U.S. 1071 , 99 S.Ct. 841 , 59 L.Ed.2d 37 (1979). “[A]gency determinations on confidentiality are not sacrosanct.” FTC v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 626 F.2d at 980 (Wald, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part); see id. at 981-84 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca2 1986
Upon timely application anyone shall be permitted to intervene in an action: (1) when a statute of the United States confers an unconditional right to intervene; or (2) when the applicant claims an interest relating to the property or transaction which is the subject of the action and he is so situated that the disposition of the action may as a practical matter impair or impede his ability to protect that interest, unless the applicant's interest is adequately represented by existing parties. (emphasis added). 3 See Note, The Timeliness Threat to Intervention of Right, 89 Yale L.J. 586 , 593-…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Yonkers Board of Education
See, e.g., Spirt v. Teachers’ Ins. & Annuity Ass'n, 93 F.R.D. 627, 637 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd in part and rev'd in part on other grounds, 691 F.2d 1054 (2d Cir.1982), vacated on other grounds, 463 U.S. 1223 , 103 S.Ct. 3565 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1406 (1983); United States v. Hooker Chems. & Plastics Corp., 540 F.Supp. 1067, 1082-83 (W.D.N.Y.1982); see also Fleming v. Citizens for Albemarle, Inc., 577 F.2d 236, 237-38 (4th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1071 , 99 S.Ct. 842 , 59 L.Ed.2d 37 (1979); Liddell v. Caldwell, 546 F.2d 768, 771 (8th Cir.1976). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Sands
See Russell v. United States, 369 U.S. 749, 755-56 (1962); United States v. Kehoe, 562 F.2d 65, 68 (1st Cir. 1977); see also United States v. Dipp, 581 F.2d 1323, 1328 (9th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1071 (1979); United States v. Damato, 554 F.2d 1371, 1373 (5th Cir. 1977); United States v. Demopoulos, 506 F.2d 1171, 1176 (7th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 991 (1975); Dolan v. United States, 218 F.2d 454, 457 (8th Cir. 1955); United States v. Moran, 194 F.2d 623, 626 (2d Cir. 1952).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Leigh Raymond Tamura
Fulton, 549 F.2d at 1328 ; see also United States v. Dipp, 581 F.2d 1323, 1327 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1071 , 99 S.Ct. 841 , 59 L.Ed.2d 37 (1979); United States v. Williams, 493 F.Supp. 599, 602-03 (D.Md.1979).
Utah Power & Light Co.
v.
Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. and Colorado River Water Conservation District v. Environmental Defense Fund, Inc.
v.
Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. and Colorado River Water Conservation District v. Environmental Defense Fund, Inc.
No. 78-658; No. 78-678.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 8, 1979.
Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.