Bryan v. Baird, 43 S.E. 419 (Ga. 1903). · Go Syfert
Bryan v. Baird, 43 S.E. 419 (Ga. 1903). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
99 citation events (27 in the last 25 years) across 26 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Williams v. N.C. Dep't of Justice (ncctapp, 2020-08-18)
Treatment trajectory · 1911 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1911 1968 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Williams v. N.C. Dep't of Justice (2×) also: Cited "see"
N.C. Ct. App. · 2020 · confidence medium
Byrd v. English, 117 Ga. 191, 193-94 , 43 S.E. 419, 420 (1903).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Williams v. N.C. Dep't of Justice (2×) also: Cited "see"
N.C. Ct. App. · 2020 · confidence medium
Byrd v. English, 117 Ga. 191, 193-94 , 43 S.E. 419, 420 (1903).
examined Cited as authority (rule) John Scott Wedemeyer v. Pneudraulics, Inc. (3×)
11th Cir. · 2013 · confidence medium
Id. at 419-420.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Lowe's Home Centers, Inc. v. General Electric Co.
11th Cir. · 2004 · confidence medium
Byrd v. English, 111 Ga. 191, 192, 43 S.E. 419, 419-20 (1903).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Lowe's Home Centers, Inc. v. General Electric Co.
11th Cir. · 2004 · confidence medium
Byrd v. English, 117 Ga. 191, 192 , 43 S.E. 419, 419-20 (1903).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Getty Refining & Marketing Co. v. Mt Fadi B
3rd Cir. · 1985 · confidence medium
The Byrd court did not preclude the possibility that the utility company might recover from the defendant “any sums which the company was compelled to pay in damages to its customers.” Id. at 420.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Hercules Carriers, Inc. v. State of Florida
11th Cir. · 1983 · confidence medium
They are, of course, liable to the [electric] company for any wrong that may have been done it, and the damages recoverable on that account might well be held to include any sums which the company was compelled to pay in damages to its customers; but the customers themselves can not go against the defendants to recover on their own account for the injury done the company. 14 117 Ga. at 194 , 43 S.E. at 420 (emphasis added). 15 In Robins and Byrd, plaintiff A was in contract with party B, who failed to deliver contracted for benefits to A because of interference from tortfeasor C.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) The Complaint of Hercules Carriers, Inc. v. Florida
11th Cir. · 1983 · confidence medium
They are, of course, liable to the [electric] company for any wrong that may have been done it, and the damages recoverable on that account might well be held to include any sums which the company was compelled to pay in damages to its customers;. but the customers themselves can not go against the defendants to recover on their own account for the injury done the company. 117 Ga. at 194 , 43 S.E. at 420 (emphasis added).
cited Cited "see" American Petroleum & Transport, Inc. v. City of New York
2d Cir. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See 43 S.E. at 420-21 . 7 .
discussed Cited "see" Curd v. Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
Fla. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Byrd, 117 Ga. 191 , 43 S.E. 419 ; Ross Towboat, 280 Mass. 282 , 182 N.E. 477 .
cited Cited "see" Glawson v. State
Ga. · 1913 · signal: see · confidence high
See Harris v. State, 117 Ga. 13 ( 43 S. E. 419 ) ; Crawford v. Goodwin, 128 Ga. 134 ( 57 S. E. 240 ) ; Sistrunk v. Mangum, 138 Ga. 222 ( 75 S. E. 7 ).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Louisiana ex rel. Guste v. M/V Testbank
5th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Byrd v. English, 117 Ga. 191 , 43 S.E. 419 (1903); Cattle v. Stockton Waterworks Co., 10 Q.B. 453, 457 (C.A.1875).
cited Cited "see, e.g." State of Louisiana v. Testbank
5th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Byrd v. English, 117 Ga. 191 , 43 S.E. 419 (1903); Cattle v. Stockton Waterworks Co., 10 Q.B. 453, 457 (C.A.1875).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bryan
v.
Baird
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Feb 10, 1903.
43 S.E. 419
A. R. Bryan and Robert L. Rodgers, for plaintiff., Arnold & Arnold, for defendants.
Candleb.
Published
Candleb, J.

This ;was an action for damages for malicious prosecution. The evidence for the plaintiff, taken most strongly in his favor, tended only to show that his name had been given to a member of the grand jury by one of the defendants, along with others comprising a list of physicians alleged to be practicing medicine illegally. There was no evidence that the plaintiff was ever indicted, or that any prosecution was ever set in motion against him by any of the defendants. The grant of a nonsuit was, therefore, not error. Judgment affirmed.

By five Justices.