Owens v. Ocean Forest Club, Inc., 12 S.E.2d 839 (1941). · Go Syfert
Search
Owens v. Ocean Forest Club, Inc., 12 S.E.2d 839 (1941). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
36 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Buff v. Columbia Baking Co. (sc, 1949-06-10)
Treatment trajectory · 1943 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1943 1984 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
cited Cited "see" Buff v. Columbia Baking Co.
S.C. · 1949 · signal: see · confidence high
See Owens v. Ocean Forest Club, supra; Ferguson v. State Highway Department, supra; and Horovitz on Workmen’s Compensation, 133-134. *52 This matter has given this Court grave concern.
discussed Cited "see" Southwestern Portland Cement Co. v. Simpson (2×)
10th Cir. · 1943 · signal: see · confidence high
See Owens v. Ocean Forest Club, 196 S.C. 97 , 12 S.E.2d 839 , 841; Standard Acc. Ins.
Owens
v.
Ocean Forest Club, Inc.
Jan 14, 1941.
12 S.E.2d 839
Messrs. Wright Burroughs , for appellants, cite: Construction of Act: 99 A., 263; 11 N.E., 709; L.R.A., 1916-D, 933; 97 A., 723. As to finding of fact of commission: 186 S.C. 374 ; 195 S.E., 646 ; 185 S.C. 497 ; 194 S.E., 447 ; 188 S.C. 393 ; 199 S.E., 530 ; 190 S.C. 425 ; 3 S.E.2d 492 . Admissibility of verdict of coroner's jury: 123 N.E., 606; 6 A.L.R., 540. Messrs. G. Lloyd Ford and J.M. Long , for respondent, cite: Review of award of commission: 188 S.C. 393 ; 199 S.E., 530 ; 185 S.C. 497 ; 194 S.E., 447 ; 186 S.C. 374 ; 195 S.E., 646 ; 188 S.C. 363 ; 199 S.E., 412 ; 189 S.C. 188 ; 200 S.E., 727 ; 190 S.C. 229 ; 2 S.E.2d 740 ; 190 S.C. 425 ; 3 S.E.2d 492 ; 193 S.C. 66 ; 7 S.E.2d 712 . Death in course of employment: 163 S.E., 576 ; 165 S.E., 850; 71 C.J., 1060; 9 S.E.2d 562 . Evidence: 43 S.C. 528 ; 21 S.E., 886 ; 113 S.C. 309 ; 101 S.E., 920 ; 82 S.C. 159 ; 63 S.E., 684 ; 115 S.C. 235 ; 105 S.E., 345 ; 54 S.C. 174 ; 32 S.E., 149 ; 58 S.C. 70 ; 36 S.E., 440 ; 42 S.E., 944; 124 S.C. 397 ; 117 S.E., 409 ; 159 S.C. 337 ; 157 S.E., 7 ; 37 C.J., 633.
MR. JUSTICE FISHBURNE..

January 14, 1941. The opinion of the Court was delivered by A careful consideration of the record in this case convinces us that the lower Court correctly disposed of all the issues presented by the appeal, and we adopt its decree as the judgment of this Court. Let the decree be reported.

Judgment affirmed.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE BONHAM and MR. JUSTICE BAKER concur.

MR. JUSTICE STUKES did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.