Searcy v. Just., 204 S.E.2d 25 (N.C. 1974). · Go Syfert
Search
Searcy v. Just., 204 S.E.2d 25 (N.C. 1974). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 4× by 1 distinct case · "a tape recording should not be excluded merely *599 because parts of it are inaudible if there are other parts that can be heard"
cited 4× by 1 distinct case · “a tape recording should not be excluded merely because parts of it are inaudible if there are other parts that can be heard”
40 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Williams (nc, 1993-09-10)
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974 2000 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
examined Cited as authority (quoted) State v. Williams (4×)
N.C. · 1993 · quote attribution · 4 verbatim quotes · confidence low
a tape recording should not be excluded merely 599 because parts of it are inaudible if there are other parts that can be heard
George Giffen SEARCY, by his Guardian Ad Litem, George W. Schiro
v.
George Giffen JUSTICE. Annette Search LEVI v. George Giffen JUSTICE.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Apr 2, 1974.
204 S.E.2d 25
Published
2 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 66%
Citer courts: Supreme Court of North Carolina (4)

Randolph & Randolph, for plaintiffs.

Francis M. Coiner, Arthur J. Redden, for defendant.

Petition for writ of certiorari by Plaintiffs to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, 20 N.C.App. 559, 202 S.E.2d 314. Denied.