State v. Clay, 360 S.E.2d 96 (N.C. 1987). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Clay, 360 S.E.2d 96 (N.C. 1987). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“questions concerning alimony rest within the sound discretion of the family court judge whose conclusion will not be disturbed absent a showing of abuse of discretion.”
10 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Hicks v. Hicks (scctapp, 2011-03-24)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Hicks v. Hicks
S.C. Ct. App. · 2011 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
questions concerning alimony rest within the sound discretion of the family court judge whose conclusion will not be disturbed absent a showing of abuse of discretion.
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Alice CLAY.
308P87.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Sep 3, 1987.
360 S.E.2d 96
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 59%
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of South Caro… (1)

[*97] Edward J. David, Fayetteville, for defendant.

Charles J. Murray, Sp. Deputy Atty. Gen., Raleigh, for the State.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of September 1987."