Finch v. City of Durham, 388 S.E.2d 452 (N.C. 1989). · Go Syfert
Search
Finch v. City of Durham, 388 S.E.2d 452 (N.C. 1989). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
42 citation events (9 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Smith v. Winn-Dixie Charlotte, Inc. (ncctapp, 2001-02-20)
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989 2007 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Smith v. Winn-Dixie Charlotte, Inc.
N.C. Ct. App. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See DeHaven v. Hoskins, 95 N.C.App. 397, 399 , 382 S.E.2d 856, 858 , disc. review denied, 325 N.C. 705 , 388 S.E.2d 452 (1989).
cited Cited "see" JWL Investments, Inc. v. Guilford County Board of Adjustment
N.C. Ct. App. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See id.
discussed Cited "see" River Birch Associates v. City of Raleigh (2×)
unknown court · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Finch v. City of Durham, 325 N.C. 352, 367 , 384 S.E.2d 8, 17 , reh’g denied, 325 N.C. 714 , 388 S.E.2d 452 (1989) (one purpose of an option contract is to minimize investment exposure by postponing the decision to accept or reject an offer).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Vernon FINCH, Juaita Finch, Daniel J. Bullard and Christine Bullard
v.
The CITY OF DURHAM, North Carolina.
85PA89.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Dec 7, 1989.
388 S.E.2d 452
Published

[*453] Karen A. Sindelar, Asst. City Atty., for City of Durham.

Mount, White, Hutson & Carden, Maxwell, Martin, Freeman & Beason, Durham, for plaintiffs.

S. Ellis Hankins, Gen. Counsel, Wilmington, Andrew L. Romanet, Jr., Asst. Gen. Counsel, Raleigh, for NC League of Municipalities.

Thomas C. Pollard, City Atty., Robert W. Oast, Jr., Asst. City Atty., Chapel Hill, for City of Wilmington.

Henry W. Underbill, Jr., City Atty., Charlotte, Jesse L. Warren, City Atty., Greensboro, for City of Charlotte and City of Greensboro.

Harry H. Harkins, Jr., Durham, for Watts Hospital-Hillandale Neighborhood Assoc.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff in this matter for rehearing of the decision of this Court pursuant to Rule 31, N.C. Rules of Appellate Procedure, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th day of December 1989."