green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.8 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2008 ·
…principles of construction applicable to contracts also apply to premarital agreements
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
McIntyre v. McIntyre
(2×)
principles of construction applicable to contracts also apply to premarital agreements
discussed
Cited "see"
Dalenko v. WAKE COUNTY DEPT. OF HUMAN SERV.
See Harwood v. Johnson, 326 N.C. 231, 237 , 388 S.E.2d 439, 443 (where suit cannot be maintained against governmental entity, suit may not be maintained against employee of that entity for actions taken in employee's official capacity), reh'g denied, 326 N.C. 488 , 392 S.E.2d 90 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dalenko v. Wake County Department of Human Services
See Harwood v. Johnson, 326 N.C. 231, 237 , 388 S.E.2d 439, 443 (where suit cannot be maintained against governmental entity, suit may not be maintained against employee of that entity for actions taken in employee’s official capacity), reh’g denied, 326 N.C. 488 , 392 S.E.2d 90 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Shaw v. Stroud
Accord Harwood v. Johnson, 92 N.C.App. 306 , 374 S.E.2d 401 (App.1988), aff'd in part, rev’d in part on other grounds, 326 N.C. 231 , 388 S.E.2d 439 (1990), reh’g denied, 326 N.C. 488 , 392 S.E.2d 90 (1990); Piggot v. City of Wilmington, 50 N.CApp. 401, 273 S.E.2d 752 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Deborah Shaw, Administratrix of the Estate of Sidney Bowen, Deceased Nancy Bowen, Individually, and as Guardian Ad Litem for Kimberly Yvonne Bowen and Lee Frederick Bowen, the Minor Children of Sidney Bowen v. C.I. Stroud, Individually, and Alfred E. Morris, J.M. Smith J.A. McVicker J.H. Parks, in Their Individual Capacities, Deborah Shaw, Administratrix of the Estate of Sidney Bowen, Deceased Nancy Bowen, Individually, and as Guardian Ad Litem for Kimberly Yvonne Bowen and Lee Frederick Bowen, the Minor Children of Sidney Bowen v. Alfred E. Morris C.I. Stroud, J.M. Smith, in Their Individual Capacities, and J.A. McVicker J.H. Parks, in Their Individual Capacities, Deborah Shaw, Administratrix of the Estate of Sidney Bowen, Deceased Nancy Bowen, Individually, and as Guardian Ad Litem for Kimberly Yvonne Bowen and Lee Frederick Bowen, the Minor Children of Sidney Bowen v. C.I. Stroud Alfred E. Morris J.M. Smith, in Their Individual Capacities, Deborah Shaw, Administratrix of the Estate of Sidney Bowen, Deceased Nancy Bowen, Individually, and as Guardian Ad Litem for Kimberly Yvonne Bowen and Lee Frederick Bowen, the Minor Children of Sidney Bowen v. C.I. Stroud, Individually
Accord Harwood v. Johnson, 92 N.C.App. 306 , 374 S.E.2d 401 (App.1988), aff'd in part, rev'd in part on other grounds, 326 N.C. 231 , 388 S.E.2d 439 (1990), reh'g denied, 326 N.C. 488 , 392 S.E.2d 90 (1990); Piggot v. City of Wilmington, 50 N.C.App. 401 , 273 S.E.2d 752 (1981).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hemric v. Groce
App. 181, 185 , 571 S.E.2d 845, 848 (2002) (emphasis supplied); see also Harwood v. Johnson, 326 N.C. 231 , 388 S.E.2d 439 , reh’g denied, 326 N.C. 488 , 392 S.E.2d 90 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Price v. Davis
Moreover, “[t]he provision of police services, and the erection and operation of prisons and jails, have previously been determined to *560 constitute governmental functions.” Kephart, supra (citations omitted) (holding actions of county officials in maintaining confinement facilities constitute governmental functions for purposes of applying sovereign immunity); see also, Harwood v. Johnson, 326 N.C. 231 , 388 S.E.2d 439 , reh’g denied, 326 N.C. 488 , 392 S.E.2d 90 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Williams v. Williams
See also Howell v. Landry, 96 N.C.App. 516, 530 , 386 S.E.2d 610, 618 (1989), disc. review denied, 326 N.C. 482 , 392 S.E.2d 90 (1990) (although G.S. § 52-10 requires acknowledgment of contracts between spouses entered into "during coverture, the period of marriage, it does not require acknowledgment for premarital agreements.") The document at issue herein recites that on the date of execution, the parties were "living separate and apart." However, it further provides that "the parties may desire to resume cohabitation as Husband and Wife in an effort to reconcile their differences," and tha…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Randy L. HARWOOD
v.
Aaron J. JOHNSON, Secretary of the North Carolina Dept. of Correction, in his official and individual capacities; Bruce B. Briggs, Chairman of the North Carolina Parole Commission, in his official and individual capacities; Louis R. Colombo, Wanda J. Garrett, Jeffrey T. Ledbetter, and A. Leon Stanback, Jr., Members of the North Carolina Parole Commission, individually and in their official capacities; Gwen O. Williams, Parole Case Analyst, in her official and individual capacities; and James F. Bame, Superintendent of the Rowan County Prison Unit, in his official capacity only.
v.
Aaron J. JOHNSON, Secretary of the North Carolina Dept. of Correction, in his official and individual capacities; Bruce B. Briggs, Chairman of the North Carolina Parole Commission, in his official and individual capacities; Louis R. Colombo, Wanda J. Garrett, Jeffrey T. Ledbetter, and A. Leon Stanback, Jr., Members of the North Carolina Parole Commission, individually and in their official capacities; Gwen O. Williams, Parole Case Analyst, in her official and individual capacities; and James F. Bame, Superintendent of the Rowan County Prison Unit, in his official capacity only.
37PA89.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Apr 5, 1990.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of North Caro… (2)
Marvin Sparrow and Michael S. Hamden, for Harwood.
Jacob L. Safron, Sp. Deputy Atty. Gen., Raleigh, for defendants.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendants in this matter for rehearing of the decision of this Court pursuant to Rule 31, N.C. Rules of Appellate Procedure, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of April 1990."