Nash v. Motorola Commc'ns & Elec., Inc., 400 S.E.2d 36 (N.C. 1991). · Go Syfert
Search
Nash v. Motorola Commc'ns & Elec., Inc., 400 S.E.2d 36 (N.C. 1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 6× by 3 distinct cases · “The defendant candidly concedes . . . that he did not raise any double jeopardy issue at trial. Therefore, this issue has been waived.”
31 citation events (21 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Wysong and Miles Co. v. Employers of Wausau (ncmd, 1998-04-03)
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Wysong and Miles Co. v. Employers of Wausau (2×)
M.D.N.C. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Nash v. Motorola Communications and Elecs., Inc., 96 N.C.App. 329, 331 , 385 S.E.2d 537, 538 (1989), aff'd, 328 N.C. 267 , 400 S.E.2d 36 (1991).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Claude E. NASH and Janis Wessolleck
v.
MOTOROLA COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONICS, INC., Charles Robinson, Motorola, Inc. and Aircall, Inc.
568PA89.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Feb 7, 1991.
400 S.E.2d 36
Per Curiam.
Published
2 passages pin-cited by 3 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 92%
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of North Caro… (4)

Patrick U. Smathers, P.A., Canton, for plaintiffs appellees.

[*37] Van Winkle, Buck, Wall, Starnes and Davis, P.A. by Roy W. Davis, Jr., and Michelle Rippon, Asheville, for defendants appellants.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MARTIN, J., did not participate in this decision.