State v. Van Trusell, 524 S.E.2d 804 (N.C. 2000). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Van Trusell, 524 S.E.2d 804 (N.C. 2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
28 citation events (26 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Midkiff v. Compton (ncctapp, 2010-05-18)
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Midkiff v. Compton
N.C. Ct. App. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jones v. Asheville Radiological Grp., 134 N.C.App. 520, 531 , 518 S.E.2d 528, 535 (1999) (Walker, J., dissenting in part) (citing Cates v. Wilson, 321 N.C. 1, 17 , 361 S.E.2d 734, 744 (1987) (Mitchell, J., concurring in the result)), rev'd, 351 N.C. 348 , 524 S.E.2d 804 (2000) (per curiam); see also State v. Smith, 347 N.C. 453, 461-62 , 496 S.E.2d 357, 362 (1998) (where the defendant sought to suppress his statements to the police by arguing he had been suffering from controlled substance withdrawal symptoms, the defendant placed at issue his past state of mind, and the State properly sou…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of North Carolina
v.
William Van Trusell
324A99.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Mar 3, 2000.
524 S.E.2d 804
Michael F. Easley, Attorney General, by Marian Hill Bergdolt, Assistant Attorney General, and Lorinzo L. Joyner, Special Deputy Attorney General, for the State. , Paul Pooley for defendant-appellant.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

As to the issue on direct appeal based on the dissenting opinion of Judge Greene, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals for the reasons stated in that dissent and remand to that court for further remand to the Superior Court, Lee County, for proceedings consistent with the dissent below. We conclude the petition for discretionary review as to an additional issue was improvidently allowed.

REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED IN PART.