green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Miles v. Martin
Mere assertions by [a party] or its attorneys in pleading will not suffice.” Id. at 576, 525 S.E.2d at 792 .
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Multimedia Publishing of North Carolina, Inc. v. Henderson County
Id. at 576, 525 S.E.2d at 792 (emphasis added).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Sigma Construction Co. v. Guilford County Board of Education
“In camera review by the trial court of the minutes of the closed session provides the easiest and most effective way for the [public] body to objectively demonstrate that the closed session was in fact warranted.” Id. at 576, 525 S.E.2d at 792 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brown v. American Partners
See also Multimedia Publ'g of N.C., Inc. v. Henderson County, 136 N.C.App. 567 , 576, *122 525 S.E.2d 786 , 792 (holding that "[m]ere assertions" that privilege applies "will not suffice," but rather party must proffer "some objective indicia" that privilege applies), disc. review denied, 351 N.C. 474 , 543 S.E.2d 492 (2000).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
LITTLE
v.
ATKINSON
v.
ATKINSON
No. 79P00.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Apr 6, 2000.
Published
Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 April 2000.