State v. Holden, 602 S.E.2d 360 (N.C. 2004). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Holden, 602 S.E.2d 360 (N.C. 2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
46 citation events (45 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: State v. Brewer (ncctapp, 2005-07-19)
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State v. Brewer
N.C. Ct. App. · 2005 · confidence medium
The trial court “made no attempt to distinguish among the ten different counts submitted to the jury.” The indictments were “simply short form indictments . . . alleging] defendant committed first degree statutory rape occurring within a time period between 1 November 1999 and 12 May 2000, without specifying any specific date for any offense.” Id. at 507, 586 S.E.2d at 516 .
discussed Cited "see" Malone v. Hutchinson-Malone
N.C. Ct. App. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
A supporting parent may enter into an enforceable agreement to pay more than would be required under the child support guidelines or to pay for *548 a longer period of time than required by North Carolina General Statute § 50-13.4(c) (2), but if the contractual child support amount or duration is less than required by statute, the child support obligee may still recover child support up to the amount and duration required under the statute. 3 See, e.g., Smith v. Smith, 121 N.C.App. 334 , 340, 465 S.E.2d 52 , 56 (1996) ("The law of this State establishes that a parent can assume contractual ob…
discussed Cited "see" State v. Braxton (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Holden, 359 N.C. 60 , 602 S.E.2d 360 .
State of North Carolina
v.
Michael Keith Holden
574PA03.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Oct 7, 2004.
602 S.E.2d 360
Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Amy C. Kunstling, Assistant Attorney General, for the State-appellant. , Rudolph A. Ashton, III and Kirby H. Smith, III for defendantappellee. , Thomas F. Loflin, III and Seth H. Jaffe, Managing Attorney, on behalf of American Civil Liberties Union of North Carolina Legal Foundation, Inc., amicus curiae.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 10 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

The members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. [1] Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See Crawford v. Commercial Union Midwest Ins. Co., 356 N.C. 609, 572 S.E.2d 781 (2002); Robinson v. Byrd, 356 N.C. 608, 572 S.E.2d 781 (2002).

AFFIRMED.

1

. At the time this case was heard and decided, the Court consisted of only six members, due to the retirement of Associate Justice Orr on 31 July 2004.