Robertson v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment for the City of Charlotte, 611 S.E.2d 417 (N.C. 2005). · Go Syfert
Search
Robertson v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment for the City of Charlotte, 611 S.E.2d 417 (N.C. 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 4× by 1 distinct case · …defendants do not seek to avoid inconsistent decisions; they seek to avoid any litigation at all.
27 citation events (27 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Lennie v. Profile Products, LLC (nc, 2007-11-09)
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Lennie v. Profile Products, LLC (4×)
N.C. · 2007 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 4 verbatim quotes · confidence low
defendants do not seek to avoid inconsistent decisions; they seek to avoid any litigation at all.
Richard H. ROBERTSON and Barbara G. Robertson
v.
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FOR THE CITY OF CHARLOTTE.
65P05.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Mar 3, 2005.
611 S.E.2d 417
Published
1 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 73%
Citer courts: Supreme Court of North Carolina (4)

Louis A. Bledsoe, Jr., Charlotte, for Mr. and Mrs. Robertson.

Terri V. Hagler-Gray, Assistant City Attorney, for Bd. of Adjustment, Charlotte.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 25th day of January 2005 by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of March 2005."