State v. Shearin, 624 S.E.2d 369 (N.C. 2005). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Shearin, 624 S.E.2d 369 (N.C. 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“public safety and the safety of an officer justify directing a driver or passenger to exit the vehicle during a traffic stop”
29 citation events (29 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Kizer (ncctapp, 2010-03-16)
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
examined Cited as authority (quoted) State v. Kizer (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 2010 · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
public safety and the safety of an officer justify directing a driver or passenger to exit the vehicle during a traffic stop
discussed Cited "see" In Re Db (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Shearin, 170 N.C.App. 222, 226 , 612 S.E.2d 371, 375-76 (holding scope of Terry search is protective in nature and is limited to search for weapons that may be used against officer, but evidence of contraband, plainly felt during pat-down or frisk, may also be admissible, provided officer "had probable cause to believe that the item was in fact contraband"), appeal dismissed and disc. review denied, 360 N.C. 75 , 624 S.E.2d 369 (2005); State v. Martinez, 158 N.C.App. 105, 109 , 580 S.E.2d 54, 57-58 (holding officer may conduct pat-down search, for purpose of determining whether pe…
discussed Cited "see" State v. Morton (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Shearin, 170 N.C.App. 222, 226 , 612 S.E.2d 371, 376 ("Evidence of contraband, plainly felt during a pat-down or frisk, may also be admissible, provided the officer had probable cause to believe that the item was in fact contraband."), appeal dismissed and disc. review denied, 360 N.C. 75 , 624 S.E.2d 369 (2005). "`Probable cause exists if the facts and circumstances within the knowledge of the officer were sufficient to warrant a prudent man in believing that the suspect had committed or was committing the offense.'" State v. Bowman, ___ N.C.App. ___, ___, 666 S.E.2d 831, 834-35 …
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Roy P. SHEARIN.
338P05.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Nov 3, 2005.
624 S.E.2d 369
Published
1 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 60%
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of North Caro… (2)

Russell J. Hollers, III, Durham, for Roy P. Shearin.

Gerald K. Robbins, Special Deputy Attorney General, William Graham, District Attorney, for State of NC.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 21st day of June 2005 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of November 2005."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 21st day of June 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of November 2005."