green
Positive treatment
2.5 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Abk
See In re J.E., 362 N.C. 168 , 655 S.E.2d 831 (2008) (holding an order terminating parental rights should be affirmed when the children were represented by a GAL at the termination hearing but were unrepresented during prior hearings not on direct appeal).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Bollinger
See also State v. Hill, 185 N.C.App. 216, 224 , 647 S.E.2d 475, 480 (2007) (Tyson, J., dissenting) ("A change in an indictment does not constitute an amendment where the variance was inadvertent and defendant was neither misled nor surprised as to the nature of the charges.") (citation omitted), rev'd per curiam, 362 N.C. 169 , 655 S.E.2d 831 (2008).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of J.E. and Q.D.
297A07.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Jan 25, 2008.
655 S.E.2d 831
Per Curiam.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
North Carolina Guardian ad Litem Program, by Pamela Newell Williams, Appellate Coordinator, and Matt McKay, Attorney Advocate, for appellant Guardian ad Litem; and Mecklenburg County Attorney's Office, by Twyla H. George, for petitioner-appellant Mecklenburg County Department of Social Services.
Betsy J. Wolfenden, Chapel Hill, for respondent-appellee mother.
PER CURIAM.
For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed and that court is instructed to reinstate the order of the trial court terminating respondent's parental rights.
REVERSED.