green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.6 score
“here a respondent lacks notice of a possible ground for termination, it is error for the trial court to conclude such a ground exists.”
Treatment trajectory · 2008 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2008
2017
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In re: I.R.L.
here a respondent lacks notice of a possible ground for termination, it is error for the trial court to conclude such a ground exists.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re MM
See In re Peirce, 53 N.C.App. 373, 380 , 281 S.E.2d 198, 202-03 (1981) (holding that the comprehensiveness of former Article 24B-the predecessor to Article 11-showed the legislature's intent that Article 24B "exclusively control the procedure to be followed in the termination of parental rights" and that there was no intent for "the requirements of the basic rules of civil procedure of G.S. 1A-1 be superimposed upon" the statutory requirements governing proceedings to terminate parental rights); see also In re B.L.H., 190 N.C.App. 142, 145-46 , 660 S.E.2d 255, 257 (holding that the "North Caro…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of B.L.H. and Z.L.H., minor children.
259A08.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Dec 12, 2008.
669 S.E.2d 320
Charlotte W. Nallan, Asheville, for petitioner-appellant Buncombe County Department of Social Services.
Michael N. Tousey, Attorney Advocate, Asheville, for appellant Guardian ad Litem.
Annick Lenoir-Peek, Assistant Appellate Defender, for respondent-appellee mother.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.