State v. McArthur, 675 S.E.2d 361 (N.C. 2009). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. McArthur, 675 S.E.2d 361 (N.C. 2009). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
25 citation events (25 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In re H.W. (ncctapp, 2018-02-20)
Treatment trajectory · 2009 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2009 2017 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" In re H.W.
N.C. Ct. App. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See id. (citing In re P.M. , 169 N.C.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In re: G.T.
N.C. Ct. App. · 2016 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, e.g. , In re B.M. , 183 N.C.App. 84 , 89, 643 S.E.2d 644 , 647 (2007) (affirming an adjudication of neglect where a nine-day-old was removed from the mother's custody after testing positive for cocaine, the mother admitted to using cocaine prior to the juvenile's birth, there was domestic violence between the parents, and the mother refused to sign a safety agreement); see also In re A.S. , 190 N.C.App. 679 , 690, 661 S.E.2d 313 , 320 (2008), aff'd. , 363 N.C. 254 , 675 S.E.2d 361 (2009) ("When ... the juvenile being adjudicated has never resided in the parent's home, the decision of the …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re CM
N.C. Ct. App. · 2009 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., In re A.S., ___ N.C.App. ___, ___, 661 S.E.2d 313, 321 (2008) (affirming the trial court's adjudication of neglect of one child based on evidence that respondent had abused another child by intentionally burning her), affirmed per curiam, 363 N.C. 254 , 675 S.E.2d 361 (2009); In re P.M., 169 N.C.App. 423, 427 , 610 S.E.2d 403, 406 (2005) (affirming adjudication of neglect of one child based on prior adjudication of neglect with respect to other children and lack of accepting responsibility).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Amy Rebecca McARTHUR.
363PA08.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
May 1, 2009.
675 S.E.2d 361
Per Curiam.
Published

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Thomas J. Ziko, Senior Deputy Attorney General, for the State.

Mark Montgomery, Durham, for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.