Premier Petroleum Co. v. Box, 257 S.W.2d 105 (Tex. 1953). · Go Syfert
Search
Premier Petroleum Co. v. Box, 257 S.W.2d 105 (Tex. 1953). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
19 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Hochheim Prairie Farm Mutual Insurance Ass'n v. Burnett (texapp, 1985-10-30)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Hochheim Prairie Farm Mutual Insurance Ass'n v. Burnett
Tex. App. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Premier Petroleum Co. v. Box, 255 S.W.2d 298, 300 (Tex.Civ.App.—Eastland), writ ref'd n.r.e. per curiam, 257 S.W.2d 105 (Tex.1953) (owner allowed to testify as to value of land); Barstow v. Jackson, 429 S.W.2d 536, 538 , (Tex.Civ.App.—San Antonio 1968) (owner allowed to testify as to value of automobile).
discussed Cited "see" Burton-Dixie Corporation v. Timothy McCarthy Construction Company, Inc., No. 30455 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409 (2×)
5th Cir. · 1971 · signal: see · confidence high
See Premier Petroleum Co. v. Box, Tex.Civ.App.1950, 255 S.W.2d 298, 301 , writ ref'd, 152 Tex. 321 , 257 S.W.2d 105 ; 5 Am.Jur.2d Arbitration & Award 51; Annot., 161 A.L.R. 1426 , 1428; Annot., 117 A.L.R. 301 , 304.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Premier Petroleum Company
v.
W. E. Box, Jr.
No. A-4082.
Texas Supreme Court.
Apr 15, 1953.
257 S.W.2d 105
Turner' & Seaberry, of Eastland, for petitioner., Scarborough, Yates, Scarborough & Black, of Abilene, for respondent.
Cited by 10 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam.

The two points of error in petitioner’s application for writ of error present in different form the same question, thus stated by the second point: “The Court of Civil Appeals erred in holding that petitioner is liable for damages shown to have been suffered by Box regardless of any negligence by petitioner.”

We approve the holding of the Court of Civil Appeals on that question. 255 S. W. 2d 298. See also Meyer v. Cox, 252 S. W. 2d 207, in which application for writ of error was refused.

Several other questions were decided by the Court of Civil Appeals, but no points in the application attack the decision of those questions, and we have no jurisdiction of them. Hence, the application is refused, no reversible error.

Delivered: April 15, 1953.

Rehearing overruled May 13, 1953.