Campbell v. Martinez, 793 S.W.2d 885 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990). · Go Syfert
Search
Campbell v. Martinez, 793 S.W.2d 885 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
10 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Pope v. Pope (moctapp, 2005-12-20)
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Pope v. Pope
Mo. Ct. App. · 2005 · confidence medium
By presenting evidence, appellants waived any error in denying the motion for directed verdict at the close of respondent’s case in chief.” Powell v. Hickman, 793 S.W.2d 885, 891 (Mo.App.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Estate of Bonner
Mo. Ct. App. · 1997 · confidence medium
Powell v. Hickman, 793 S.W.2d 885, 892 (Mo. App. 1990).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Rebound, Inc. v. Pugh
Mo. Ct. App. · 1997 · confidence medium
Powell v. Hickman, 793 S.W.2d 885, 892 (Mo. App. 1990).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Hague v. MacArthur
Mo. Ct. App. · 1995 · confidence medium
See Ladish v. Gordon, 879 S.W.2d 623, 627 (Mo.App.W.D.1994); Powell v. Hickman, 793 S.W.2d 885, 809 (Mo.App.W.D.1990).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Sondergard v. Kansas City Power & Light Co.
Mo. Ct. App. · 1992 · confidence medium
The rule governing that situation was stated in Powell v. Hickman, 793 S.W.2d 885 (Mo.App.1990), “[i]t is held that a party to an action will not be heard to complain of the admission of testimony over his objection, where testimony of the same tenor has been admitted without objection.” Id. at 893, citing Sullivan v. Union Electric Light & Power, 56 S.W.2d 97, 104 (Mo. 1932).
cited Cited "see" MFA INC. v. Dettler
Mo. Ct. App. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Powell v. Hickman, 793 S.W.2d 885, 892 (Mo.App.1990).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Donna (Martinez) CAMPBELL
v.
Gualberto MARTINEZ
No. WD 42717.
Missouri Court of Appeals.
Jun 26, 1990.
793 S.W.2d 885
Gualberto Martinez, Kansas City, pro se., K. Elizabeth Davis, Div. of Child Support Enforcement, Liberty, for respondent.
Kennedy, Manford, Ulrich.
Published

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Direct appeal from the denial of a motion to quash garnishment of wages for child support payments.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).