Williams v. State, 805 S.W.2d 474 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). · Go Syfert
Search
Williams v. State, 805 S.W.2d 474 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
16 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Pritchett v. State (texapp, 1994-03-31)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see, e.g." Pritchett v. State
Tex. App. · 1994 · signal: see also · confidence low
Tex.R.CRIM.Evid. 804(b)(2); see also Williams v. State, 800 S.W.2d 364, 368 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1990, pet. refd, 805 S.W.2d 474 (Tex.Crim.App.1991)).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Melvin Earl WILLIAMS
v.
The STATE of Texas
No. 043-91.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Mar 13, 1991.
805 S.W.2d 474
Hardy Burke, Denton, for appellant., Jerry Cobb, Former Dist. Atty. and Gwinda Burns, Asst. Dist. Atty., Denton, Robert Huttash, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.
Maloney.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

OPINION

MALONEY, Judge.

A jury convicted appellant of aggravated robbery and assessed punishment at confinement for 75 years. The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. Williams v. State, 800 S.W.2d 364 (Tex.App.—Ft. Worth 1990).

Appellant raises two grounds for review. After careful review we refuse appellant’s petition for review. However, as is true in every case where discretionary review is refused, this refusal does not constitute endorsement or adoption of the reasoning employed by the Court of Appeals. Sheffield, v. State, 650 S.W.2d 813 (Tex.Cr.App. 1983). With this understanding, we refuse appellant’s petition for discretionary review.