green
Positive treatment
2.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Gadman v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development
Particularly applicable to the instant case is the language in Von Cannon v. State Dept. of Highways, 306 So.2d 437 (La.App. 3d Cir.1975), writ den. 309 So.2d 681, 682 (La.1975), dealing with the DOTD’s duty to provide adequate warnings against dangerous conditions: There is no hard and fast rule as to the types of warnings or safeguards.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Gadman v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV.
Particularly applicable to the instant case is the language in Von Cannon v. State Dept. of Highways, 306 So.2d 437 (La.App. 3d Cir.1975), writ den. 309 So.2d 681, 682 (La.1975), dealing with the DOTD's duty to provide adequate warnings against dangerous conditions: There is no hard and fast rule as to the types of warnings or safeguards.
cited
Cited "see"
First Nat. Bank of Commerce v. Ordoyne
See Teche Realty & Investment Co. v. A.M.F., Inc., 306 So.2d 432, 436 (La.App. 3d Cir.1975), writ denied, 309 So.2d 681 (La.1975) for a more detailed review of the requisite elements of proof.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Norris v. State
See also Von Cannon v. State, Department of Highways, 306 So.2d 437 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1975), writs refused 309 So.2d 681 (La.), and numerous cases cited therein.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Geneva VON CANNON
v.
STATE of Louisiana, Through the DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS and Yvonne S. Donaldson.
v.
STATE of Louisiana, Through the DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS and Yvonne S. Donaldson.
Published
Writ denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal the result is correct.