Reese v. State, 453 So. 2d 810 (Fla. 1984). · Go Syfert
Search
Reese v. State, 453 So. 2d 810 (Fla. 1984). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
14 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Billue (fladistctapp, 1986-11-12)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State v. Billue
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1986 · confidence medium
NOTES [1] In State v. Watson, the supreme court stated: "We approve the district court's construction and application of the statute to the case before it, for the reasons expressed by that court." 453 So.2d at 811.
discussed Cited "see" MELODIE F. MILLER v. STATE OF FLORIDA
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Watson, 453 So. 2d 810 (Fla. 1984); Harmon v. State, 438 So. 2d 369 (Fla. 1983); Miller v. State, 935 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (table decision); Campbell v. State, 884 So. 2d 190 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Harris v. State, 777 So. 2d 994 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Dunn v. State, 522 So. 2d 41 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).
cited Cited "see" Meyer v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See T.T. v. State, 459 So.2d 471 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984) and Watson v. State, 437 So.2d 702 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983), appv'd., 453 So.2d 810 (Fla. 1984).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Powlowski v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State v. Watson, 453 So.2d 810 (Fla. 1984); Harmon v. State, 438 So.2d 369 (Fla. 1983).
Robert REESE
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 64620.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Jul 19, 1984.
453 So. 2d 810
Jerry Hill, Public Defender, and Deborah K. Brueckheimer, Asst. Public Defender, Tenth Judicial Circuit, Clearwater, for petitioner., Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Charles Core-es, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for respondent.
Adkins, Alderman, Boyd, Ehrlich, McDonald, Overton, Shaw.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
SHAW, Justice.

We have before us by petition for review Reese v. State, 440 So.2d 654 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983), which expressly declared constitutionally valid section 843.185 [renumbered section 843.035], Florida Statutes (Supp. 1982). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

Reese was charged in Count IV of an information with obstruction of justice by giving false information in violation of the aforementioned statute. He moved to dismiss Count IV, arguing that chapter 82-150, Laws of Florida, which created section 843.185, violated the one-subject provision of article III, section 6 of the Florida Constitution. The motion was denied, and Reese pleaded nolo contendere to the charge under Count IV, reserving the right to appeal the trial court's denial of the motion.

The district court affirmed, following its resolution of the identical issue in State v. Bunnell, 447 So.2d 228 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). On petition for review of Bunnell, Bunnell v. State, 453 So.2d 808 (Fla.1984), decided this day, we held that section 1 of chapter 82-150 does indeed violate the constitutional one-subject provision, rendering section 843.035 unconstitutional, and we quashed the district court decision in Bun-nell.

Accordingly, on the authority of this court’s decision in Bunnell v. State, we quash the district court decision and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

It is so ordered.

BOYD, C.J., and ADKINS, OVERTON, ALDERMAN, McDONALD and EHRLICH, JJ., concur.