State v. Dickerson, 584 So. 2d 1140 (La. 1991). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Dickerson, 584 So. 2d 1140 (La. 1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
61 citation events (46 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Gillin (lactapp, 2016-09-22)
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
cited Cited "see" State v. Gillin
La. Ct. App. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Dickerson, 584 So.2d 1140 (La.1991) (per curiam) (La.
cited Cited "see" State v. Boyles
La. Ct. App. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Dickerson, 584 So.2d 1140 (La.1991); State v. Nora, 2013-0892 (La.App. 4 Cir. 6/18/14) , 143 So.3d 1237 .
cited Cited "see" State v. Brooks
La. Ct. App. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Dickerson, 584 So.2d 1140 (La. 1991); State v. Nora, 2013-0892 (La.App. 4 Cir. 6/18/14) ,T43 So.3d 1237.
cited Cited "see" State v. Nora
La. Ct. App. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Dickerson, 584 So.2d 1140, 1140 (La.1991). .
cited Cited "see" State v. Celestine
La. Ct. App. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Dickerson, 584 So.2d 1140 (La.1991).
cited Cited "see" State v. Gipson
La. Ct. App. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Dickerson, 584 So.2d 1140 (La.1991).
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. LeBeau
La. Ct. App. · 1993 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare State v. Dickerson, 579 So.2d 472 (La.App. 3d Cir.1991), modified, 584 So.2d 1140 (La.1991); State ex rel.
STATE of Louisiana
v.
William DICKERSON.
91-K-1120.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Sep 6, 1991.
584 So. 2d 1140
Per Curiam.
Cited by 42 opinions  |  Published

PER CURIAM.

Granted in part.

La.Rev.Stat. 15:529.1 requires that the sentencing judge vacate the original sentence and resentence the defendant as a multiple offender. In resentencing, the judge must impose a sentence authorized by La.Rev.Stat. 15:529.1. That statute does not authorize the imposition of a fine, but only provides for enhanced sentences relating to the term of imprisonment. The trial judge was therefore without authority to impose a fine on resentencing under La.Rev.Stat. 15:529.1.

Accordingly, the fine and default provisions of defendant's sentence are deleted. The application is otherwise denied.