In Interest of CK, 601 So. 2d 1331 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). · Go Syfert
Search
In Interest of CK, 601 So. 2d 1331 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
15 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: T.M. v. Department of Children & Families (fladistctapp, 2001-05-04)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
cited Cited "see" T.M. v. Department of Children & Families
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See In the Interest of C.K., 601 So.2d 1331 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).
cited Cited "see" In Interest of Km & Am
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See In the Interest of C.K., 601 So.2d 1331 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).
cited Cited "see" Tc v. Department of Health & Rehab.
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re C.K., 601 So.2d 1331 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); In re C.M.P., 608 So.2d 568 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); I.M. v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Servs., 668 So.2d 275 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).
cited Cited "see" JACOBS WIND ELEC. v. Dept. of Transp.
Fla. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Department of Transportation v. Padgett, 601 So.2d 1331, 1333 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).
cited Cited "see" K.P. v. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See In the Interest of C.K., 601 So.2d 1331 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).
IN the Interest of C.K., a Minor, V.K., natural mother, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, Appellee.
91-03524.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Jul 10, 1992.
601 So. 2d 1331
Patterson.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

Charles M. Samaha, St. Petersburg, for appellant.

Ronald S. Frankel, Victoria E. Mac Intosh of Victoria E. Mac Intosh, P.A., St. Petersburg, and Frank H. Nagatani, Pinellas Park, for appellee.

PATTERSON, Judge.

In this appeal from the termination of her parental rights, V.K. raises seven issues. We find merit in only one and reverse.

Neither the trial court's order terminating parental rights nor the transcript of the proceedings establishes that the court considered or evaluated the factors listed in section 39.467(2)(a)-(k), Florida Statutes (1991), in reaching its determination that the termination of parental rights is in the manifest best interests of the child. Thus, we reverse and remand with directions that the trial court conduct further proceedings to consider each factor in section 39.467(2) and render an appropriate written order setting forth findings of fact and conclusions of law. See In the Interest of R.J., 586 So.2d 496 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). The trial court should then reassess whether C.K.'s manifest best interests require the termination of V.K.'s parental rights.

Reversed and remanded.

PARKER, A.C.J., and BENTLEY, E. RANDOLPH, Associate Judge, concur.