State v. Alexis, 770 So. 2d 339 (La. 2000). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Alexis, 770 So. 2d 339 (La. 2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
331 citation events (323 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State of Louisiana Versus Kevin Johnson (lactapp, 2023-08-09)
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 35 distinct citers.
cited Cited as authority (rule) State of Louisiana Versus Kevin Johnson
La. Ct. App. · 2023 · confidence medium
Lindsey, 770 So.2d at 345.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State v. Ross
La. Ct. App. · 2016 · confidence medium
To be entitled to a downward departure, a defendant must clearly and convincingly show that “[he] is exceptional, which in this context means that because of unusual circumstances this defendant is a victim of the legislature’s failure to assign sentences that are meaningfully tailored to the culpability of the offender, the gravity of the offense, and the circumstances of the case.” State v. Lindsey, 99-3302, 99-3256, p. 5 (La. 10/17/00), 770 So.2d 339, 343 (quoting Johnson, 97-1906, p. 7, 709 So.2d at 676 ).
cited Cited as authority (rule) State v. Horne
La. Ct. App. · 2012 · confidence medium
Lindsey, supra at 99-3302 at 5, 770 So.2d at 342 (citation omitted).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State v. Anderson
La. Ct. App. · 2010 · confidence medium
Louisiana Revised Statutes 15:529.1(A)(b)(ii) provides only one penalty for one adjudicated a third felony offender under the circumstances of this case — that person “shall be imprisoned for the remainder of his natural life, without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence.” (Emphasis added.) However, in State v. Lindsey, 99-3256, 99-3302, pp. 4-5 (La.10/17/00), 770 So.2d 339, 342-43 (second, third, and fourth alterations in original), the supreme court explained that even sentences mandated by statute may be excessive in a given case: The Legislature enacted the Habitua…
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State v. Jarreau
La. Ct. App. · 2005 · confidence medium
In the Lindsey case, the Supreme Court stated that “[a] sentencing court should exercise its authority to declare excessive a minimum sentence mandated by the Habitual Offender Statute only under rare circumstances, as set forth in State v. Johnson.” 770 So.2d at 346 (emphasis in original).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State v. Thomas
La. Ct. App. · 2005 · confidence medium
Finally, "[a] sentencing court should exercise its authority to declare excessive a minimum sentence mandated by the Habitual Offender Statute only under rare circumstances...." State v. Lindsey, 99-3256, p. 9 (La.10/17/00), 770 So.2d 339, 345 (emphasis as found in the original), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 1010 , 121 S.Ct. 1739 , 149 L.Ed.2d 663 (2001).
cited Cited as authority (rule) State v. Robinson
La. Ct. App. · 2005 · confidence medium
State v. Lindsey, supra at 343.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State v. Lowery (2×)
La. Ct. App. · 2004 · confidence medium
Lindsey, 99-3302 at p. 5, 770 So.2d at 343; Johnson, 97-1906 at p. 7, 709 So.2d at 676 .
cited Cited as authority (rule) State v. Brooks
La. Ct. App. · 2004 · confidence medium
State v. Lindsey, 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), 770 So.2d 339, 345 (emphasis as found in the original).
cited Cited as authority (rule) State v. Augillard
La. Ct. App. · 2003 · confidence medium
State v. Lindsey, 99-3302, 99-3256, p. 5 (La.10/17/00), 770 So.2d 339, 343 (Citation omitted; emphasis added).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State v. Ricks (2×) also: Cited "see"
La. Ct. App. · 2002 · confidence medium
In light of State v. Lindsey, 770 So.2d at 339, the trial court erred by sentencing the defendant below the statutorily mandated fifteen years at hard labor, the first two years to be served without benefit of probation, parole or suspension of sentence.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State v. Harry
La. Ct. App. · 2002 · confidence medium
To rebut the presumption, the defendant must clearly and convincingly show that "`[he] is exceptional, which in this context means that because of unusual circumstances, the defendant is a victim of the legislature's failure to assign sentences that are meaningfully tailored to the culpability of the offender, the gravity of the offense, and the circumstances of the case.'" State v. Lindsey, 99-3256, p. 5 (La.10/17/00), 770 So.2d 339, 343 (quoting State v. Young, 94-1636 (La.App. 4 Cir. 10/26/95) , 663 So.2d 525, 529 )(Plotkin, J., concurring).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State v. Brown (2×)
La. Ct. App. · 2002 · confidence medium
Lindsey, pp. 4-5, 770 So.2d at 342-43.
cited Cited as authority (rule) State v. Cottrell
La. Ct. App. · 2002 · confidence medium
State v. Lindsey, 99-3256, p. 5 (La.10/17/00), 770 So.2d 339, 341, 343 .
cited Cited as authority (rule) State v. Dillon
La. Ct. App. · 2002 · confidence medium
State v. Lindsey, 99-3256 (La.10/17/00), 770 So.2d 339, 343, 345 ; State v. Johnson, supra ; State v. Dorthey, supra .
discussed Cited "see" State v. Howard
La. Ct. App. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
State v. Payton , 00-2899, pp. 6-9 (La. 3/15/02), 810 So.2d 1127 , 1130-32 ; see State v. Lindsey , 99-3302, p. 7 (La. 10/17/00), 770 So.2d 339 , 344 n.3, cert. denied , 532 U.S. 1010 , 121 S.Ct. 1739 , 149 L.Ed.2d 663 (2001).
cited Cited "see" State v. Small
La. Ct. App. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Lindsey, 99-3302, p. 5 (La.10/17/00), 770 So.2d 339, 343 .
cited Cited "see" State v. Sims
La. Ct. App. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), 709 So.2d 672 and State v. Lindsey, 99-3256, 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), 770 So.2d 339 .
cited Cited "see" State v. Hackett
La. Ct. App. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Lindsey, 99-3302 (La. 10/17/00), 770 So.2d 339 ; State v. Johnson, supra; State v. Dorthey, 623 So.2d 1276 (La.1993). .
cited Cited "see" State v. Buckley
La. Ct. App. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Lindsey, 99-3302, p. 5, (La.10/17/00), 770 So.2d 339, 343 .
cited Cited "see" State v. Jones
La. Ct. App. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See Murphy, 34 So.3d 886 and Lindsey, 770 So.2d 339 .
discussed Cited "see" State v. Wilson
La. Ct. App. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Lindsey, supra. Discussion The defendant claims that the trial court erred in failing to acknowledge and consider his arguments that it could deviate below the statutorily mandated sentence set forth in the Habitual Offender Law and in imposing a cruel, unusual, and excessive sentence in violation of the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution and La.
cited Cited "see" State v. Douglas
La. Ct. App. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Lindsey, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/17/00), 770 So.2d 339, 347 (Johnson, J., dissenting).
cited Cited "see" State v. Mead
La. Ct. App. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Lindsey, 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), 770 So.2d 339 ; State v. Wilson, supra .
cited Cited "see" State v. Wuneburger
La. Ct. App. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See, State v. Lindsey, 99-3256 c/w 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), 770 So.2d 339 , 343, cert. denied, 532 U.S. 1010 , 121 S.Ct. 1739 , 149 L.Ed.2d 663 (2001).
cited Cited "see" State v. Lewis
La. Ct. App. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Lindsey, pp. 4-5, 770 So.2d at 342-43.
cited Cited "see" State v. Robinson
La. Ct. App. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Lindsey, 99-3256, p. 5 (La.10/17/00), 770 So.2d 339, 343 (mandatory life sentence under the Habitual Offender Law).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Hicks
La. Ct. App. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Sugasti, 01-770 (La.App. 5 Cir. 11/27/01) , 802 So.2d 943 . [15] State v. Wickem, 99-1261 (La.App. 5 Cir. 4/12/00) , 759 So.2d 961, 968 , writ denied, 00-1371 (La.2/16/01), 785 So.2d 839 . [16] State v. Dorthey, 623 So.2d 1276, 1280 (La.1993). [17] State v. Johnson, supra at 676 ( quoting State v. Young, 94-1636 (La.App. 4 Cir. 10/26/95) , 663 So.2d 525, 528 , writ denied, 95-3010 (La.3/22/96), 669 So.2d 1223 ). [18] State v. Bell, 97-1134 (La.App. 5 Cir. 2/25/98) , 709 So.2d 921, 927 , writ denied, 98-0792 (La.9/16/98), 721 So.2d 477 . [19] State v. Johnson, 709 So.2d at 676. [20…
cited Cited "see" State v. Payton
La. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lindsey, 770 So.2d at 344-45 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State of Louisiana v. Corei K. Guidry
La. · 2017 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Lindsey, 99-3302 (La. 10/17/00), 770 So.2d 339 (Johnson, J., dissenting); State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La. 3/4/98), 709 So.2d 672 (Johnson, J., dissenting); State v. Sugasti, 01-3407 (La. 6/21/02), 820 So.2d 518 (Johnson, J., dissenting); State v. Parker, 03-0924 (La. 4/14/04), 871 So.2d 317 (Johnson, J., dissenting); Kimbrough v. Cooper, 05-2335 (La. 11/22/05), 915 So.2d 344 (Johnson, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part); State v. Johnson, 96-3041 (La. 3/4/98), 709 So.2d 679 (Johnson, J., dissenting).
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Ladd
La. Ct. App. · 2016 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State v. Lindsey, 99-3256, 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), 770 So.2d 339, 345 .
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Gibson
La. Ct. App. · 2015 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State v. Lindsey, 99-3256, 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), 770 So.2d 339, 345 .
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Chandler
La. Ct. App. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, State v. Lindsey, 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), 770 So.2d 339 , cert. denied, 532 U.S. 1010 , 121 S.Ct. 1739 , 149 L.Ed.2d 663 (2001).
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Williams
La. Ct. App. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State v. Lindsey, 99-3256, 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), 770 So.2d 339, 345 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Parker
La. Ct. App. · 2002 · signal: see also · confidence low
NOTES [1] State v. Page, 96-227 (La.App. 5 Cir. 8/28/96) , 680 So.2d 104, 106, n. 2 , writ denied, 96-2543 (La.9/19/97), 701 So.2d 153 . [2] State v. Dorthey, 623 So.2d 1276 (La.1993); State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), 709 So.2d 672, 676 . [3] State v. Dorthey, 623 So.2d at 1280 . [4] State v. Johnson, 709 So.2d at 676 ; See also, State v. Medious, 98-419 (La.App. 5 Cir. 11/25/98) , 722 So.2d 1086, 1093 , writ denied, 98-3201 (La.4/23/99), 742 So.2d 876 . [5] State v. Johnson, 709 So.2d at 676 . [6] State v. Lindsey, 99-3256 (La.10/17/00), 770 So.2d 339, 345 . [7] See State v. Smith, 99-1…
STATE of Louisiana
v.
Maurio ALEXIS.
99-K-1937.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Oct 13, 2000.
770 So. 2d 339
Calogero.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Denied.

CALOGERO, C.J., concurs with reasons.

LEMMON and JOHNSON, JJ., would grant the writ.

CALOGERO, Chief Justice, concurring in the denial.

By denying the writ application, this court has essentially opted to pretermit consideration of a major issue in this case: defendant's claim that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to object when the trial court advised select defense witnesses of their Miranda rights in the presence of the jury. I concur in this denial because, as the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal noted, the issue is one that may be raised in an application for post-conviction relief pursuant to La.Code Crim. Pro. Ann. art. 924 et seq.