discussed Cited "see" Thomas v. Roberts See In re Succession of James, 2007-2509 (La.App. 1st Cir.08/21/08), 994 So.2d 120, 122 , writ denied, 2008-2302 (La.12/12/08), 996 So.2d 1119 ; Matheme v. Broussard, 2006-0838 (La.App. 1st Cir.02/14/07), 959 So.2d 975, 980 .

cited Cited "see" Burkart v. Williamson C.C. art. 3461; see In re Succession of James, 07-2509, p. 4 (La.App. 1st Cir.8/21/08), 994 So.2d 120, 123 , writ denied, 08-2302 (La.12/12/08), 996 So.2d 1119 .

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Peck v. Richmar Construction, Inc. C.C. art. 3492 which suspended running of prescription against permanently disabled minors in products liability actions applies to causes of action that arose prior to date of amendment for which the one-year prescriptive period had not yet accrued; however, retroactive application did not extend to revive previously time-barred causes of action, as change in right to plead exception of prescription constitutes a substantive change in the law); see also Succession of James, 2007-2509 (La.App. 1 Cir. 8/21/08) , 994 So.2d 120 , vmt denied, 2008-2302 (La. 12/12/08), 996 So.2d 1119 (held that for…