Buck's Stove & C. Co. v. Am. Fed. of Labor, 219 U.S. 581 (1911). · Go Syfert
Search
Buck's Stove & C. Co. v. Am. Fed. of Labor, 219 U.S. 581 (1911). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
92 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 26 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Trans International Airlines, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters (ca9, 1980-02-14)
Treatment trajectory · 1911 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1911 1968 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) ca9 1980 (2×)
9th Cir. · 1980 · confidence medium
In our case, by contrast, there has been no out-of-court settlement by the parties of "every material controversy which the record present(s)." 219 U.S. at 581, 31 S.Ct. at 472.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Trans International Airlines, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters (2×)
9th Cir. · 1980 · confidence medium
In our case, by contrast, there has been no out-of-court settlement by the parties of “every material controversy which the record present[s].” 219 U.S. at 581, 31 S.Ct. at 472.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering
2d Cir. · 1918 · confidence medium
And an appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States was dismissed in 219 U. S. 581 , 31 Sup. Ct. 472, 55 L.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Post v. Buck's Stove & Range Co.
8th Cir. · 1912 · confidence medium
When the settlement came to the attention of the Supreme Court, it dismissed the appeals as involving questions purely moot. 219 U. S. 581 , 31 Sup. Ct. 472, 55 L.
examined Cited "see, e.g." Lopez v. National Labor Relations Board (3×)
D.C. Cir. · 2016 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Buck’s Stove & Range Co. v. American Fed’n of Labor, 219 U.S. 581 , 581, 31 S.Ct. 472 , 55 L.Ed. 345 (1911) (per curiam) (“[T]he cases had become purely moot because of the settlement between the parties of every material controversy which the record presented[.]”); In re United States, 927 F.2d 626, 627 (D.C.Cir. 1991) (agreeing that a case the government and plaintiff settled before appeal was moot).
BUCK'S STOVE & RANGE COMPANY
v.
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR. AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR v. BUCK'S STOVE & RANGE COMPANY.
190.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 20, 1911.
219 U.S. 581
Cited by 19 opinions  |  Published
APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

Mr. Daniel Davenport and Mr. J.J. Darlington for The Buck's Stove & Range Company.

Mr. Jackson H. Ralston, Mr. F.L. Siddons and Mr. William E. Richardson for The American Federation of Labor et al.

Per Curiam:

When these cases were reached for hearing and after the argument had materially progressed, it developed from statements made by counsel for both parties that the cases had become purely moot because of the settlement between the parties of every material controversy which the record presented. On the disclosure of this situation further argument was dispensed with; and for the reason which led to that action, that is, as we have said, that the controversies between the parties had become in all respects moot, the appeals must be dismissed. Richardson v. McChesney, 218 U.S. 487, 492, and cases cited. Appeals dismissed, without costs to either party. `