green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
3.7 score
“there is no more likely way to misapprehend the meaning of language - be it in a constitution, a statute, a will or a contract - than to read the words literally, forgetting the object which the document as a whole is meant to secure.”
Treatment trajectory · 1948 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1948
1987
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Jim Henson Productions, Inc. v. John T. Brady & Associates, Inc.
there is no more likely way to misapprehend the meaning of language - be it in a constitution, a statute, a will or a contract - than to read the words literally, forgetting the object which the document as a whole is meant to secure.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
duPont Glore Forgan Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
meticulous compliance by a taxpayer with conditions prescribed for the recovery of taxes paid must appear before the taxpayer can recover.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
See Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Brasileiro, 159 F.2d 661, 665 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 331 U.S. 836 , 67 S.Ct. 1519 , 91 L.Ed. 1849 (1947); In re Theisen, 349 F.Supp. 737, 740 (E.D.N.Y.1972); Beal v. Chicago, B. & Q.
discussed
Cited "see"
Pritchett v. Kimberling Cove, Inc.
See Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Brasileiro, 159 F.2d 661, 665 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 331 U.S. 836 , 67 S.Ct. 1519 , 91 L.Ed. 1849 (1947); In re Theisen, 349 F.Supp. 737, 740 (E.D.N.Y.1972); Beal v. Chicago, B. & Q.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
William McNeil v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Co., and Third-Party Plaintiff v. Wm. Spencer & Son Corporation, Third-Party
See also Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Brasileiro, 159 F.2d 661 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 331 U.S. 836 , 67 S.Ct. 1519 , 91 L.Ed. 1849 (1947).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca2 1959
See, e.g., Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Lloyd Brasileiro, 2 Cir., 159 F.2d 661 , certiorari denied 331 U.S. 836 , 67 S.Ct. 1519 , 91 L.Ed. 1849 ; Johnson v. United States, 2 Cir., 168 F.2d 886 ; Bonnewell v. United States, 4 Cir., 170 F.2d 411, 412 ; Dale v. Rosenfeld, 2 Cir., 229 F.2d 855, 858 ; Holmes, The Common Law 124-129 (1881).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Verbeeck v. Black Diamond Steamship Corp.
See, e. g., Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Lloyd Brasileiro, 2 Cir., 159 F.2d 661 , certiorari denied 331 U.S. 836 , 67 S.Ct. 1519 , 91 L.Ed. 1849 ; Johnson v. United States, 2 Cir., 168 F.2d 886 ; Bonnewell v. United States, 4 Cir., 170 F.2d 411, 412 ; Dale v. Rosenfeld, 2 Cir., 229 F.2d 855, 858 ; Holmes, The Common Law 124-129 (1881).
Masters
v.
New York Central Railroad Co.
v.
New York Central Railroad Co.
No. 1297.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 2, 1947.
Charles H. Brady for petitioner. Harold A. James for respondent.
Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (2)
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Ohio denied.