green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.0 score
“it is an interest carved out of the lessee's share of the oil and gas, ordinarily called the working interest, as distinguished from the owner's reserved royalty interest.”
Treatment trajectory · 1963 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1963
1994
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
David J. Pierce Trust v. Alpha Natural Resources, Inc.
it is an interest carved out of the lessee's share of the , ordinarily called the working interest, as distinguished from the owner's reserved royalty interest.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In re Alpha Natural Resources, Inc.
it is an interest carved out of the lessee's share of the oil and gas, ordinarily called the working interest, as distinguished from the owner's reserved royalty interest.
discussed
Cited "see"
Black Butte Coal Co. v. United States
See Meeker v. Ambassador Oil Co., 308 F.2d 875, 882-83 (10th Cir.1962), rev’d on other grounds, 375 U.S. 160 , 84 S.Ct. 273 , 11 L.Ed.2d 261 (1963); Portwood v. Buckalew, 521 S.W.2d 904, 912 (Tex.Civ.App.1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Therese A. Farber v. Massillon Board of Education
See Meeker v. Ambassador Oil Corp., 375 U.S. 160 [ 84 S.Ct. 273 , 11 L.Ed.2d 261 ] (1963).” Id. at -, 110 S.Ct. at 1337 .
cited
Cited "see"
Therese A. Farber v. Massillon Board of Education
See Meeker v. Ambassador Oil Corp., 375 U.S. 160 [ 84 S.Ct. 273 , 11 L.Ed.2d 261 ] (1963).” Id. at-, 110 S.Ct. at 1337 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Lytle v. Household Manufacturing, Inc.
See Meeker v. Ambassador Oil Corp., 375 U. S. 160 (1963) (per curiam) (reversing trial court’s decision to try equitable claims first and thereby to bar jury trial on legal claims that relied on the same facts); Tull v. United States, 481 U. S. 412 (1987) (reversing and remanding claims for monetary penalties and injunctive relief because trial court improperly denied plaintiff a jury trial on the claims for monetary penalties); Granfinanciera, S. A. v. Nordberg, 492 U. S. 33 (1989) (reversing and remanding Bankruptcy Court’s judgment because petitioners were denied a jury trial and accord…
discussed
Cited "see"
Sunac Petroleum Corporation v. Parkes
(2×)
See Meeker v. Ambassador Oil Co., 308 F.2d 875 (10th Cir. 1962), rev’d on other grounds, 375 U.S. 160 , 84 S.Ct. 273 , 11 L.Ed.2d 261 (1963); K. & E.
Berry
v.
New York
v.
New York
163, Misc.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 2, 1963.
Petitioner pro se., Michael R. Canestrano for respondent.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 10 opinions | Published
Citer courts: E.D. Virginia (1) · E.D. Virginia (1)
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Judicial Department, for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U. S. 335.