green
Positive treatment
2.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1964 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1964
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
Figueroa v. State
See Builders Corporation of America v. United States, 320 F.2d 425 (9th Cir.1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 906 , 84 S.Ct. 1182 , 12 L.Ed.2d 186 (1964); Smith v. Wait, supra .
cited
Cited "see"
Figueroa v. State
See Builders Corporation of America v. United States, 320 F.2d 425 (9th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 906 (1964); Smith v. Wait, supra. Charlotte E.
discussed
Cited "see"
Burton v. State
See Armada v. United States, 319 F.2d 793 (5th Cir. 1963), cert. denied 376 U.S. 906 ,. 84 S.Ct. 659 , 11 L.Ed.2d 605 , and United States v. Graham, 391 F.2d 439 (6th Cir. 1968), cert. denied 393 U.S. 941 , 89 S.Ct. 307 , 21 L.Ed.2d 278 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Graham, United States of America v. Grady Lee Tucker
See Williams v. United States, 323 F.2d 90 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 906 , 84 S.Ct. 659 , 11 L.Ed.2d 605 (1963).
Banco do Brasil, S. A.
v.
A. C. Israel Commodity Co., Inc.
v.
A. C. Israel Commodity Co., Inc.
No. 420.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 17, 1964.
376 U.S. 906
Frank E. Nattier, Jr., Ansel F. Luxford, Richard Tj. Newman and James H. Mann for petitioner. Jerome J. Londin, Ernest A. Gross, Hugo Kohlmann and John P. Campbell for respondent. Solicitor General Cox for the United States in opposition.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
Court of Appeals of New York. Cer-tiorari denied.