green
Positive treatment
4.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Benson v. Communication Workers of America
But see Barnard v. Commercial Carriers, Inc., 863 F.2d 694, 699 (10th Cir.1988) (“All parties in an arbitration proceeding are entitled to notice and an opportunity to be heard,” including adversely affected employees.) (citations omitted), and id. at 699 , Seymour, C.J., concurring (the union breached its duty of fair representation by failing to notify the affected employee of the grievance proceeding or inviting him to attend, citing Smith v. Hussmann, 619 F.2d at 1241 .) In Ramsey v. NLRB, 327 F.2d 784 (7th Cir.) cert. denied, 377 U.S. 1003 , 84 S.Ct. 1938 , 12 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1964), the…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Alexander and Albert Cranston, United States of America v. Bernard Cranston
See Dirring v. United States, 328 F.2d 512, 514 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 1003 , 84 S.Ct. 1939 , 12 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1964) (where witness’s cross-examination testimony contradicts his direct testimony, ordinarily the jury may decide which to accept as the truth); Zimberg v. United States, 142 F.2d 132, 136 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 323 U.S. 712 , 65 S.Ct. 38 , 89 L.Ed. 573 (1944) (same). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Eugene Education Ass'n v. Eugene School District 4J
See, International Harvester, Inc., 138 NLRB 923 (1962), enf’d sub nom Ramsey v. NLRB, 327 F2d 784 (7th Cir), cert den 377 US 1003 (1964); Spielberg Manufacturing Co., 112 NLRB 1080 (1955).’ 32 Or App at 546 .” 50 Or App at 200 . e then stated in Willamina Ed. Assoc.: “The third part of the test was framed in terms of the award’s compatability with the basic policies of the collective bargaining statute.
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Appeal from Decision of Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board
See International Harvester Co., 138 N.L.R.B. 923 , 51 L.R.R.M. 1155 (1962), aff’d 327 F.2d 784 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 1003 (1964) (the National Labor Relations Board may properly refuse to process an unfair labor practice charge where to do so will serve the fundamental aims of tbe National Labor Relations Act). 2 Rather, the Board held a hearing and made detailed findings of fact in its nisi decision and order.
discussed
Cited "see"
Willamina Education Ass'n v. Willamina School District 30J
See, International Harvester, Inc., 138 NLRB 923 (1962), enf’d sub nom Ramsey v. NLRB, 327 F2d 784 (7th Cir), cert den 377 US 1003 (1964); Spielberg Manufacturing Co., 112 NLRB 1080 (1955).” 32 Or App at 546.
cited
Cited "see"
Siegel v. Gresham Grade Teachers Ass'n
See, International Harvester, Inc., 138 NLRB 923 (1962), enf’d sub nom, Ramsey v. NLRB, 327 F2d 784 (7th Cir), cert den 377 US 1003 (1964); Spielberg Manufacturing Co., 112 NLRB 1080 (1955).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. Hussmann Refrigerator Co.
See Ramsey v. National Labor Relations Board, 327 F.2d 784 (7th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 1003 , 84 S.Ct. 1938 , 12 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1964); Thompson v. International Association of Machinists, 258 F.Supp. 235 (E.D.Va. 1966).
discussed
Cited "see"
Associated Press v. National Labor Relations Board
See Ramsey v. NLRB, 7 Cir., 327 F.2d 784, 788 , cert. denied, 377 U.S. 1003 , 84 S.Ct. 1938 , 12 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1964); cf. Haynes v. United States Pipe & Foundry Co., 5 Cir., 362 F.2d 414, 416-417 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see"
cadc 1974
See Ramsey v. NLRB, 7 Cir., 327 F.2d 784, 788 , cert. denied, 377 U.S. 1003 , 84 S.Ct. 1938 , 12 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1964); cf. Haynes v. United States Pipe & Foundry Co., 5 Cir., 362 F.2d 414, 416-417 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Russell Hines
Accord, Dirring v. United States, 328 F.2d 512 (1 Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 1003 , 84 S.Ct. 1939 , 12 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1964); United States v. Hallman, 142 U.S.App.D.C. 93 , 439 F.2d 603 (1971). 6 .
cited
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. Auburn Rubber Company, Inc.
See Ramsey v. National Labor Relations Board, 7 Cir., 327 F.2d 784, 787 , certiorari denied 377 U.S. 1003 , 84 S.Ct 1938 , 12 L.Ed.2d 1052 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Servair, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Servair, Inc.
The Board first articulated its deferral standards in Spielberg Manufacturing Company, 112 N.L.R.B. 1080 (1955), in which it announced that it would defer to an existing arbitration award if: (1) the arbitration proceedings appeared to have been fair and regular; (2) all parties agreed to be bound; and (3) the arbitrator’s decision was not “clearly repugnant to the purposes and policies of the Act.” Id. at 1082 ; see also International Harvester Co., Indianapolis Works, 138 N.L.R.B. 923 , (1962) enforced sub nom., Ramsey v. N.L.R.B., 327 F.2d 784 (7th Cir.), cert, denied, 377 U.S. 1003 ,…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
William David Curtis, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. United Transportation Union, Appellee/cross-Appellant
See also Ramsey v. NLRB, 327 F.2d 784, 788 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 1003 , 84 S.Ct. 1938 , 12 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1964). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith v. Hussmann Refrigerator Company
See also Ramsey v. NLRB, 327 F.2d 784, 788 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 1003 , 84 S.Ct. 1938 , 12 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1964); Bernard v. McLean Trucking Co., 429 F.Supp. 284, 286-87 (D.Kan.1977); Siskey v. General Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers, Local No. 261, 419 F.Supp. 48, 53 (W.D.Pa.1976); DeBelsey v. Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, 368 F.Supp. 1159, 1163 (E.D.Pa.1973); Davidson v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Local No. 1189, 332 F.Supp. 375 , 378-79 (D.N.J.1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith v. Hussmann Refrigerator Co.
See also Ramsey v. NLRB, 327 F.2d 784, 788 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 1003 , 84 S.Ct. 1938 , 12 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1964); Bernard v. McLean Trucking Co., 429 F.Supp. 284, 286-87 (D.Kan.1977); Siskey v. General Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers, Local No. 261, 419 F.Supp. 48, 53 (W.D.Pa.1976); DeBelsey v. Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, 368 F.Supp. 1159, 1163 (E.D.Pa.1973); Davidson v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Local No. 1189, 332 F.Supp. 375 , 378-79 (D.N.J.1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Lee
See also Dirring v. United States, 328 F. 2d 512, 515 (1st Cir. 1964), cert. den. 377 U. S. 1003 (1964); United States v. Craven, 478 F. 2d 1329, 1333 (6th Cir. 1973), cert. den. 414 U. S. 866 (1973); and United States v. Jackson, 482 F. 2d 1167, 1173 (10th Cir. 1973), cert. den. 414 U. S. 1159 (1974).
Lipscomb
v.
Blackwell, Warden
v.
Blackwell, Warden
No. 1279.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 22, 1964.
377 U.S. 1003
Petitioner pro se., Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall, Harold H. Greene and Gerald P. Choppin for respondent.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.