green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
5.7 score
“the supreme court has said that the determinative question is whether the taxpayer's purpose in entering into the transaction was primarily for profit.”
Treatment trajectory · 1966 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1966
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
ca10 1988
the supreme court has said that the determinative question is whether the taxpayer's purpose in entering into the transaction was primarily for profit.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Miller v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
the supreme court has said that the determinative question is whether the taxpayer's purpose in entering into the transaction was primarily for profit.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Stichting Pensioenfonds Voor De Gezondheid, Geestelijke en Maatschappelijke Belangen v. United States
Ct. 1221, 16 L.Ed.2d 300 (1966). 6 CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, the Court concludes that based upon the undisputed facts, the plaintiff is not entitled to a refund of taxes paid for 1993 because it does not qualify as a tax exempt “labor organization” under I.R.C. § 501(c)(5).
discussed
Cited "see"
Vons Companies, Inc. v. United States
See Knetsch v. United States, 172 Ct.Cl. 378 , 348 F.2d 932, 940 , 940 n. 14 (1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 957 , 86 S.Ct. 1221 , 16 L.Ed.2d 300 (1966); Bornstein v. United States, 170 Ct.Cl. 576 , 345 F.2d 558 , 564 n. 2 (1965). 9 Thus, IBM only ever so slightly expands the realm in which private letter rulings may be cited or used. 10 For its part, the Supreme Court has considered the precedential impact (or lack thereof) of private letter rulings or technical advice memoranda on three occasions.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Di Girolamo
See United States v. Kenner, 354 F.2d 780, 785 (2d Cir.1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 958 , 86 S.Ct. 1223 , 16 L.Ed.2d 301 (1966) (the payor of a bribe can, per se, be an aider and abettor).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward J. Elkins
See Thaggard v. United States, 354 F.2d 735, 739 (5th Cir.1965), 6 cert. denied, 383 U.S. 958 , 86 S.Ct. 1222 , 16 L.Ed.2d 301 (1966); see also United States v. Rapp, 871 F.2d 957, 967 (11th Cir.1989); United States v. Norton, 867 F.2d 1354 , 1366 n. 14 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 3192 , 105 L.Ed.2d 701 (1989); United States v. Rey, 811 F.2d 1453, 1457-60 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 830 , 108 S.Ct. 103 , 98 L.Ed.2d 63 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Midway Mfg. Co. v. Strohon
See Flick-Reedy Corp. v. Hydro-Line Manufacturing Co., 351 F.2d 546, 549 (7th Cir.1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 958 , 86 S.Ct. 1223 , 16 L.Ed.2d 301 (1966).
cited
Cited "see"
Williams Electronics, Inc. v. Artic International, Inc.
See Flick-Reedy Corp. v. Hydro-Line Manufacturing Co., 351 F.2d 546, 549 (7th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 958 , 86 S.Ct. 1222 , 16 L.Ed.2d 301 (1966).
cited
Cited "see"
Midway Mfg. Co. v. Artic International, Inc.
See Flick-Reedy Corp. v. Hydro-Line Manufacturing Co., 351 F.2d 546 (7th Cir. 1965), cert, denied, 383 U.S. 958 , 86 S.Ct. 1223 , 16 L.Ed.2d 301 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael
See United States v. Kenner, 354 F.2d 780, 785 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 958 , 86 S.Ct. 1223 , 16 L.Ed.2d 301 (1966) [and cases cited therein] for the proposition that a payor of a bribe can be an aider and abettor under 18 U.S.C. § 2 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Bertha Lemle v. United States
See Knetsch v. United States, 348 F.2d 932, 940 , 172 Ct.Cl. 378 (1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 957 , 86 S.Ct. 1221 , 16 L.Ed.2d 300 (1966); Bornstein v. United States, 345 F.2d 558 , 563, 175 Ct.Cl. 576 (1965); Knapp-Monarch Co. v. Commissioner, 139 F.2d 863, 864 (8th Cir. 1944).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Claude C. Wild, Jr.
Accord, Biddinger v. Commissioner of Police, 245 U.S. 128, 135 , 38 S.Ct. 41, 43 , 62 L.Ed. 193 (1917) (“The statute of limitations is a defense and must be asserted on the trial by the defendant in criminal cases . . . .”) United States v. Kenner, 354 F.2d 780, 785 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 958 , 86 S.Ct. 1223 , 16 L.Ed.2d 301 (1966). 8 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles Hubert Hill
See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 409 F.2d 804 (5th Cir. 1969). 2 . 164 U.S. 492 , 17 S.Ct. 154 , 41 L.Ed. 528 (1896). 3 . 354 F.2d 735, 739 (1965) cert. denied 383 U.S. 958 , 86 S.Ct. 1222 , 16 L.Ed.2d 301 (1966).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Sterling-Kates v. United States
See, e.g., Rough Diamond Co. v. United States, 173 Ct.Cl. 15 , 351 F.2d 636 (1965), cert. denied 383 U.S. 957 , 86 S.Ct. 1221 , 16 L.Ed.2d 300 (1966).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Russell E. Spitler, United States of America v. Duane Carpenter
See also United States v. Kenner, 354 F.2d 780, 785 (2d Cir.1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 958 , 86 S.Ct. 1223 , 16 L.Ed.2d 301 (1966).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Arrowhead Metals, Ltd. v. United States
See also Rough Diamond Co. v. United States, 173 Ct.Cl. 15, 26 , 351 F.2d 636, 642 , (1965), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 957 , 86 S.Ct. 1221 , 16 L.Ed.2d 300 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Prybil
(2×)
See, for example, United States v. Irwin, supra, where the single $400 payment was allegedly made in relation to a series of tax audits; see also United States v. Kenner, 354 F.2d 780 (2 Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 958 , 86 S.Ct. 1223 , 16 L.Ed.2d 301 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Cogan
See also United States v. Kenner, 354 F.2d 780 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 958 , 86 S.Ct. 1223 , 16 L.Ed.2d 301 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
William T. Fulwood v. United States
See, e. g., Thaggard v. United States, 354 F.2d 735 (5th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 958 , 86 S.Ct. 1222 , 16 L.Ed.2d 301 (1966) ; DeVault v. United States, 338 F.2d 179 (10th Cir. 1964); United States v. Kahaner, 317 F.2d 459, 483-484 (2d Cir.), cert. denied Corallo v. United States, 375 U.S. 835 , 84 S.Ct. 62 , 11 L.Ed.2d 65 (1963); United States v. Barnhill, 305 F.2d 164 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 865 , 83 S.Ct. 126 , 9 L.Ed.2d 102 (1962); White v. United States, 279 F.2d 740, 750 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 850 , 81 S.Ct. 96 , 5 L.Ed.2d 74 (1960); Costello v. United S…
S. D. Warren Co.
v.
National Labor Relations Board
v.
National Labor Relations Board
No. 939.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 28, 1966.
Robert W. Meserve and John R. Halley for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Arnold, Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, Norton J. Come and Leonard M. Wagman for respondent.
Published
Citer courts: Tenth Circuit (2)
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.