Miller v. California, 389 U.S. 968 (1967). · Go Syfert
Search
Miller v. California, 389 U.S. 968 (1967). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
31 citation events across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Thomas v. State (texcrimapp, 1986-11-19)
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968 1997 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
discussed Cited "see" Thomas v. State (2×)
Tex. Crim. App. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See People v. Sudduth, 65 Cal.2d 543 , 55 Cal.Rptr. 393 , 421 P.2d 401 , cert. den. 389 U.S. 850 , 88 S.Ct. 43 , 19 L.Ed.2d 119 , reh. den. 389 U.S. 996 , 88 S.Ct. 460 , 19 L.Ed.2d 506 (1966).
Lucille Miller
v.
California
154.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 4, 1967.
389 U.S. 968
F. Lee Bailey and Alan M. Dershowitz for petitioner., Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Philip C. Griffin, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist. Certiorari granted limited to Questions 1 and 2 presented by the petition which read as follows:

“1. Whether the introduction of admissions made to an undercover agent planted in petitioner’s jail cell constituted a violation of petitioner’s constitutional rights to counsel and against self-incrimination.

“2. Whether inculpatory admissions, obtained under circumstances like those here involved, can ever constitute harmless error.”