John Dalmer Benton v. Maryland, 392 U.S. 925 (1968). · Go Syfert
Search
John Dalmer Benton v. Maryland, 392 U.S. 925 (1968). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
19 citation events across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Benton v. Copinger (mdd, 1968-10-18)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Benton v. Copinger
D. Maryland · 1968 · confidence medium
In transferring the case to the appellate docket for hearing (Appeal No. 201, October Term, 1968), the Supreme Court directed that the questions to be presented on appeal would be confined to the following (392 U.S. at 925-926, 88 S.Ct. at 2297): “(1) Is the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment applicable to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment? “(2) If so, was the petitioner ‘twice put in jeopardy’ in this case?” .
cited Cited "see" Corey v. State
Me. · 1968 · signal: see · confidence high
See 392 U.S. 925 , 88 S.Ct. 2289 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1384 .
John Dalmer Benton
v.
Maryland
1185, Misc.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 17, 1968.
392 U.S. 925
Published

392 U.S. 925

88 S.Ct. 2297

20 L.Ed.2d 1384

John Dalmer BENTON, petitioner,
v.
MARYLAND.

No. 1185, Misc.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 1968

H. Thomas Sisk and M. Michael Cramer, for petitioner.

Francis B. Burch, Atty. Gen. of Maryland, and Edward F. Borgerding, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

1

Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland granted limited to the following questions:

2

(1) Is the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment applicable to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment? (2) If so, was the petitioner 'twice put in jeopardy' in this case? Case transferred to the appellate docket and placed on the summary calendar.