green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.5 score
“appellant's decision to walk from the dining room to his bedroom in order to change into more appropriate clothing was voluntary and consensual.”
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Kenneth Joe Whitten, John Elmer Gaiefsky, Jack Wayne Gish, Richard Lawrence Shimel
appellant's decision to walk from the dining room to his bedroom in order to change into more appropriate clothing was voluntary and consensual.
discussed
Cited "see"
Gomez v. Chody
"To find an abuse of discretion, we must conclude that 'no reasonable man could agree with the district court.' " Mumford, 814 F.2d at 329 (quoting Metlyn Realty Corp. v. Esmark, Inc., 763 F.2d 826, 831 (7th Cir.1985)); see Valmont Indus., Inc. v. Enresco, Inc., 446 F.2d 1193, 1195 (10th Cir.1971) ("granting or denial of [a Rule 60(b) ] motion will not be disturbed on appeal except for a manifest abuse of discretion"), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 922 , 92 S.Ct. 960 , 30 L.Ed.2d 793 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gomez v. Chody
“To find an abuse of discretion, we must conclude that ‘no reasonable man could agree with the district court.’ ” Mumford, 814 F.2d at 329 (quoting Metlyn Realty Corp. v. Esmark, Inc., 763 F.2d 826, 831 (7th Cir.1985)); see Valmont Indus., Inc. v. Enresco, Inc., 446 F.2d 1193, 1195 (10th Cir.1971) (“granting or denial of [a Rule 60(b) ] motion will not be disturbed on appeal except for a manifest abuse of discretion”), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 922 , 92 S.Ct. 960 , 30 L.Ed.2d 793 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Davis v. State
(2×)
See United States v. Jorgenson 451 F.2d 516 (10th Cir.1971), cert. den., 405 U.S. 922 , 92 S.Ct. 959 , 30 L.Ed.2d 793 ; See also Fillmore v. Crisp, 480 F. Supp. 310 (W.D.Okla. 1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Nelson
See Giacalone v. Lucas, 445 F.2d 1238, 1247 (6th Cir. 1971) ("Appellant's decision to walk from the dining room to his bedroom in order to change into more appropriate clothing was voluntary and consensual.'1), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 922 (1972); State v. Johnson, 306 So. 2d 724, 728 (La. 1975) (warrantless entry following arrest outside premises upheld where defendant was one who desired to reenter apartment).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Earl Jones, Robert Glen Hyams, Connie Janko, Tommy Duane Ramsey, Deborah Sue Ramsey and Conrad Janko
See United States v. Jorgenson, 451 F.2d 516 (10th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 922 , 92 S.Ct. 959 , 30 L.Ed.2d 793 (1972); United States v. Bryant, 364 F.2d 598 (4th Cir. 1966); 8 Moore’s Federal Practice § 8.06[2].
discussed
Cited "see"
Earl Edward Gandy v. State of Alabama
See generally Giacalone v. Lucas, 445 F.2d 1238 (6th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 922 , 92 S.Ct. 960 , 30 L.Ed.2d 793 (1972). 10 Here, the listed factors, all known by the trial court when the continuance motion was considered, point toward the granting of Petitioner’s motion: (1) the delay requested was only for so long as the Talledega County civil case lasted; (2) the associate, Hancock, was completely unprepared and unfamiliar with the case; (3) other continuances had been requested by and granted to both sides; (4) losing the services of Petitioner’s retained counsel outweighed …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Brown
See United States v. Jorgenson, 451 F.2d 516, 521 (10th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 922 , 92 S.Ct. 959 , 30 L.Ed.2d 793 (1972). 7 There was no violation of Rule 43(a) prejudicial to the substantial rights of the appellants.
discussed
Cited "see"
ca6 1978
See United States v. Jorgenson, 451 F.2d 516, 521 (10th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 922 , 92 S.Ct. 959 , 30 L.Ed.2d 793 (1972). 7 17 There was no violation of Rule 43(a) prejudicial to the substantial rights of the appellants.
cited
Cited "see"
Michael Santo Polizzi v. United States of America, Emprise Corporation v. United States
See United States v. Jorgenson, 10 Cir., 1971, 451 F.2d 516, 520-21 , cert. denied, 1972, 405 U.S. 922 , 92 S.Ct. 959 , 30 L.Ed.2d 793 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Cowman
See United States v. Jorgenson, 451 F.2d 516 (10 Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 922 , 92 S.Ct. 959 , 30 L.Ed.2d 793 (1972); Washington Times Co. v. Bonner, 66 App.D.C. 280 , 86 F.2d 836 (1936); People v. Fiore, 176 Cal.App.2d 536 , 1 Cal.Rptr. 351 (1959); Harris v. Commonwealth, 411 S.W.2d 924 (Ky.1967); State v. Lupino, 268 Minn. 344 , 129 N.W.2d 294 (1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 978 , 85 S.Ct. 681 , 13 L.Ed.2d 569 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles Loken Freed
See United States v. Jorgenson, 451 F.2d 516 (10th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 922 , 92 S.Ct. 959 , 30 L.Ed.2d 793 ; Jones v. United States, 299 F.2d 661 (10th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 864 , 83 S.Ct. 123 , 9 L.Ed.2d 101 ; reh. denied, 371 U.S. 931 , 83 S.Ct. 294 , 9 L.Ed.2d 239 . 3 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Carlos Ibarra Vasquez
Id.; see also United States v. Jorgenson, 451 F.2d 516, 521 (10th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 922 , 92 S.Ct. 959 , 30 L.Ed.2d 793 (1972) (defendant has no right to be present at in camera conference on evidentiary matters when his *849 lawyer was present at the conference).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Paulino Izaguirre Rojas v. Robert Richardson, Kenneth McGee and M and R Cattle Company, a Partnership
See also Jenkins v. General Motors Corp., 446 F.2d 377 (5th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 922 , 92 S.Ct. 959 , 30 L.Ed.2d 793 (1972) (a timely objection generally is required to preserve appealability); United States v. Rayborn, 310 F.2d 339 (6th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 373 U.S. 952 , 83 S.Ct. 1683 , 10 L.Ed.2d 707 (1963) (accord) (prosecutor’s statements at trial).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Joseph D. Slappy v. Paul John Morris, Warden
Compare Gandy v. Alabama, 569 F.2d 1318, 1324-25 (5th Cir. 1978) (granting habeas petition because trial court’s evaluation of factors and reconciliation of values in refusing to grant a continuance was so arbitrary as to violate principles of due process) with Giacalone v. Lucas, 445 F.2d 1238 (6th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 922 , 92 S.Ct. 960 , 30 L.Ed.2d 793 (1972) (denying habeas petition based on conclusion that trial court’s denial of continuance based on medically related absence of attorney was in accordance with due process). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Andrew F. Burton
See also Powell v. Alabama, supra note 21, 287 U.S. at 59 , 53 S.Ct. at 60 , 77 L.Ed. at 165 -166 25 Giacalone v. Lucas, 445 F.2d 1238, 1240 (7th Cir. 1971), Cert. denied, 405 U.S. 922 , 92 S.Ct. 960 , 30 L.Ed.2d 793 (1972) 26 Chandler v. Fretag, 348 U.S. 3, 10 , 75 S.Ct. 1, 5 , 99 L.Ed. 4, 10 (1954).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Paul Price v. E. P. Perini, Superintendent Marion Correctional Institution
See also Giacalone v. Lucas, 445 F.2d 1238 (6th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 922 , 92 S.Ct. 960 , 30 L.Ed.2d 793 (1972).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Cateno Turchio v. D/s A/s Den Norske Africa, and Third Party Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. Pittston Stevedoring Corporation, Third Party
See, e. g., Jenkins v. General Motors Corp., 446 F.2d 377 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 922 , 92 S.ct. 959, 30 L.Ed.2d 793 (1972).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ronald w.jordan
See also, United States v. Jorgenson, 451 F.2d 516 (10 Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 922 , 92 S.Ct. 959 , 30 L.Ed.2d 793 (1972) ; United States v. Dickens, 417 F.2d 958 (8 Cir. 1969).
Mariemont, Inc.
v.
Masheter, Director of Highways
v.
Masheter, Director of Highways
No. 71-785.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1972.
Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (1)
Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.