green
Positive treatment
4.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Springer v. Collins
(2×)
But see Fitzgerald v. Estelle, 505 F.2d 1334, 1335-38 , 1344 et seq. (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2636 , 45 L.Ed.2d 675 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
James Barksdale v. Michael P. Lane
See Barksdale v. Ryan, 398 F.Supp. 700 (N.D.Ill.1974), aff'd, 511 F.2d 1405 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2637 , 45 L.Ed.2d 676 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Grant v. State
(2×)
See Kirkland v. State, 86 Fla. 64 , 97 So. 502 (1923) and Dornau v. State, 306 So.2d 167 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974), cert. den., 422 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2636 , 45 L.Ed.2d 675 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Pilkey
(2×)
See Hewlett v. State, 517 S.W.2d 760, 767 (Tenn.Crim.App.1974), cert, denied 422 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2636 , 45 L.Ed.2d 675 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. State
(2×)
See Fitzgerald v. Estelle, 505 F.2d 1334 (Fifth Cir., 1975), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2636 , 45 L.Ed.2d 675 , where it was held that when a lawyer’s ineffectiveness has rendered a trial fundamentally unfair, whether he be retained or appointed and whether his action or inaction was known or unknown to the State trial officials, a deprivation of Fourteenth Amendment Due Process results from the enforcement of the resultant judgment.
discussed
Cited "see"
Cuyler v. Sullivan
See generally Fitzgerald v. Estelle, 505 F. 2d 1334, 1345-1346 (CA5 1974) (en banc) (Godbold, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part), cert. denied, 422 U. S. 1011 (1975); West v. Louisiana, 478 F. 2d 1026, 1032-1034 (CA5 1973), vacated and remanded, 510 F. 2d 363 (1975) (en banc).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert Allen Gaines v. Joe S. Hopper
(2×)
Accord, Fitzgerald v. Estelle, 505 F.2d 1334 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2636 , 45 L.Ed.2d 675 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Alonzo Doran
(2×)
Accord, Fitzgerald v. Estelle, 505 F.2d 1334 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2636 , 45 L.Ed.2d 675 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Paul Peter Solina, Jr. v. United States
(2×)
See, e.g., Fitzgerald v. Estelle, 505 F.2d 1334, 1336-37 (5 Cir.1974) (en banc), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2636 , 45 L.Ed.2d 675 (1975), in which a majority of 11 held that although the state was responsible when “a lawyer’s ineffectiveness has rendered a trial fundamentally unfair, whether he be retained or appointed”, it was not when retained counsel had simply failed to meet the Sixth Amendment’s standard of effectiveness, with five judges voting to hold the latter also to be a violation.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Britton v. State
(2×)
See also Dornau v. State, 306 So.2d 167 (Fla.2d DCA 1974), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2636 , 45 L.Ed.2d 675 (1975).
Hewlett
v.
Tennessee
v.
Tennessee
No. 74-6421.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 16, 1975.
Published
Ct. Crina. App. Tenia. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 517 S. W. 2d 760.