green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
9.9 score
G Cite
cited 12× by 1 distinct case ·
"Rule 60(b)(5) does not apply where a case relied on as precedent by the court in rendering the present judgment has since been reversed."
cited 8× by 1 distinct case ·
“... a consent judgment does have res judicata effect . . .”
cited 8× by 1 distinct case ·
"... a consent judgment does have res judicata effect ..."
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“if the evidence on the issue [of entrapment] is conflicting, the issue of entrapment should be submitted to the jury.”
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 28 distinct citers.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Curl v. Curl
(2×)
rule 60(b)(5) does not apply where a case relied on as precedent by the court in rendering the present judgment has since been reversed.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Annie Martinez, A/K/A Annie Griego, and Gloria Dominguez-Williams
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
if the evidence on the issue is conflicting, the issue of entrapment should be submitted to the jury.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Nash County Board of Education v. Biltmore Co.
... a consent judgment does have res judicata effect . . .
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Nash County Board Of Education v. The Biltmore Company
... a consent judgment does have res judicata effect ...
cited
Cited "see"
Janice Longoria and John Stryk, Jr. v. Robert Stryk, Individually and as the Independent of the Estate of John Stryk
See Humane Soc'y v. Austin Nat'l Bank , 531 S.W.2d 574, 577 (Tex. 1975), cert. denied , 425 U.S. 976 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Herman G. Panton
United States v. Fischer, 531 F.2d 783 (5th Cir.1976); see United States v. Doe, 525 F.2d 878 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 976 , 96 S.Ct. 2179 , 48 L.Ed.2d 801 (1976); United States v. Freund, 525 F.2d 873 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 923 , 96 S.Ct. 2631 , 49 L.Ed.2d 377 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Melchor De Los Santos
See United States v. Doe, 525 F.2d 878, 880 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 976 , 96 S.Ct. 2179 , 48 L.Ed.2d 801 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Anthony F. Gomez
See United States v. Gurule, 522 F.2d 20, 23 , cert. den., 425 U.S. 976 , 96 S.Ct. 2177 , 48 L.Ed.2d 800 (10 Cir.1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Mingle v. State
See United States v. Doe, 525 F.2d 878, 880 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 976 , 96 S.Ct. 2179 , 48 L.Ed.2d 801 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Milford Burkley, (Two Cases)
See United States v. Gurule, 522 F.2d 20, 25 (10th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 976 , 96 S.Ct. 2177 , 48 L.Ed.2d 800 (1976); United States v. Gardner, 516 F.2d 334, 347-48 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 861 , 96 S.Ct. 118 , 46 L.Ed.2d 89 (1975); United States v. Pena-Ozuna, 511 F.2d 1106, 1107-08 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 850 , 96 S.Ct. 92 , 46 L.Ed.2d 73 (1975); United States v. Pollard, 483 F.2d 929, 932 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1137 , 94 S.Ct. 882 , 38 L.Ed.2d 762 (1974); United States v. Watson, 489 F.2d 504, 506 (3rd Cir. 1973). 25 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mandel
See United States v. Keane, 522 F.2d 534 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 976 , 96 S.Ct. 1481 , 47 L.Ed.2d 746 , 44 U.S.L.W. 3527 (1976); United States v. Isaacs, 493 F.2d 1124 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 976 , 94 S.Ct. 3183 , 41 L.Ed.2d 1146 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hoffenberg v. Hoffman & Pollok
See Amalgamated Sugar Co. v. NL Indus., Inc., 825 F.2d 634 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 992 , 108 S.Ct. 511 , 98 L.Ed.2d 511 (1987); see also Clark & Co., Inc. v. Acheson Indus., Inc., 532 F.2d 846 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 976 , 96 S.Ct. 2177 , 48 L.Ed.2d 800 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Richards v. Read
See, e. g., Wallace Clark & Co. v. Acheson Industries, 532 F.2d 846 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 976 , 96 S.Ct. 2177 , 48 L.Ed.2d 800 (1976), and cases cited, 532 F.2d at 848 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Labor Relations Board v. Local 46, Metallic Lathers Union & Reinforcing Iron Workers of New York & Vicinity of the International Ass'n of Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers
“This is so because the entry of a consent judgment is an exercise of judicial power ... that is entitled to appropriate respect and because of the policy favoring finality of judgments.” Amalgamated Sugar Co. v. NL Indus., Inc., 825 F.2d 634 , 639 (2d Cir.1987) (internal citations omitted), cert. denied sub nom Rothenberg v. Amalgamated Sugar Co., 484 U.S. 992 , 108 S.Ct. 511 , 98 L.Ed.2d 511 (1987); see also Wallace Clark & Co. v. Acheson Industries, Inc., 532 F.2d 846, 848 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 976 , 96 S.Ct. 2177 , 48 L.Ed.2d 800 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Labor Relations Board v. Local 46
"This is so because the entry of a consent judgment is an exercise of judicial power ... that is entitled to appropriate respect and because of the policy favoring finality of judgments." Amalgamated Sugar Co. v. NL Indus., Inc., 825 F.2d 634 , 639 (2d Cir.1987) (internal citations omitted), cert. denied sub nom Rothenberg v. Amalgamated Sugar Co., 484 U.S. 992 , 108 S.Ct. 511 , 98 L.Ed.2d 511 (1987); see also Wallace Clark & Co. v. Acheson Industries, Inc., 532 F.2d 846, 848 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 976 , 96 S.Ct. 2177 , 48 L.Ed.2d 800 (1976). 54 The record is clear that Local 46…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sullivan
Ortiz, 804 F.2d at 1165 (citing United States v. Smegal, 772 F.2d 659, 660 (10th Cir.1985)); see also United States v. Gurule, 522 F.2d 20, 25 (10th Cir.1975) cert. denied, 425 U.S. 976 , 96 S.Ct. 2177 , 48 L.Ed.2d 800 (1976); Martinez v. United States, 373 F.2d 810, 812 (10th Cir.1967) 19 Only Russell and Mary Sullivan were charged in Count 5 (possession of an unregistered firearm) and neither defendant points to any evidence of entrapment with respect to that count 20 In particular, the government informants testified that the defendants had been actively involved in the manufacture of amphe…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sullivan
Ortiz, 804 F.2d at 1165 (citing United States v. Smegal, 772 F.2d 659, 660 (10th Cir.1985)); see also United States v. Gurule, 522 F.2d 20, 25 (10th Cir.1975) cert. denied, 425 U.S. 976 , 96 S.Ct. 2177 , 48 L.Ed.2d 800 (1976); Martinez v. United States, 373 F.2d 810, 812 (10th Cir.1967). .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Washington
See, e.g., United States v. Doe, 525 F.2d 878 (5th Cir.), cert, denied 425 U.S. 976 , 96 S. Ct. 2179 , 48 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Washington
See, e.g., United States v. Doe, 525 F.2d 878 (5th Cir.), cert. denied 425 U.S. 976 , 96 S.Ct. 2179 , 48 L.Ed.2d 801 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Lugo
See also United States, v. Doe, 525 F.2d 878, 880 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 976 (1976) (trial court on motion for new trial conducted posttrial in camera proceedings to see if its prior order denying disclosure was correct). 2 It does not appear that the defendant was given advance notice of the motion, which was filed on the first day of trial. 3 The burden placed on a defendant must not be too severe, as he is claiming an absence of knowledge and may lack the very information needed to make a threshold showing.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James Lee Spencer v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic & Classification Center, Respondent
(2×)
See, e.g., Tennon v. State, 235 Ga. 594 , 220 S.E.2d 914 (1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 908 , 96 S.Ct. 2231 , 48 L.Ed.2d 833 (1976), Sanders v. State, 235 Ga. 425 , 219 S.E.2d 768 (1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 976 , 96 S.Ct. 2177 , 48 L.Ed.2d 800 (1976); Holsey v. State, 235 Ga. 270 , 219 S.E.2d 374 (1975); Young v. State, 232 Ga. 285 , 206 S.E.2d 439 (1974); Williams v. State, 232 Ga. 203 , 206 S.E.2d 37 (1974); Simmons v. State, 226 Ga. 110 , 172 S.E.2d 680 (1970); Miller v. State, 224 Ga. 627 , 163 S.E.2d 730 (1968).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. R. C. French
United States v. Shaw, 570 F.2d 770, 772 (8th Cir. 1978); see also United States v. Gurule, 522 F.2d 20, 23 (10th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 976 , 96 S.Ct. 2177 , 48 L.Ed.2d 800 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
William A. Gaines v. Norman B. Hess and the Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
(2×)
See, e. g., United States v. Doe, 525 F.2d 878 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 976 , 96 S.Ct. 2179 , 48 L.Ed.2d 801 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vulcan, Inc. v. Fordees Corporation
(2×)
See also Wallace Clark & Co. v. Acheson Ind., Inc., 532 F.2d 846 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 976 , 96 S.Ct. 2177 , 48 L.Ed.2d 800 (1976); Aro Co. v. Allied Witan Co., 531 F.2d 1368 (6th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 862 , 97 S.Ct. 165 , 50 L.Ed.2d 140 (1976); Langsam, supra. The strong public interest in achieving finality in litigation is advanced by giving res judicata effect to consent decrees.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Jose R. Suarez, Jr., and Virginia Peters Suarez v. United States
See, e. g., United States v. Doe, 5 Cir., 1976, 525 F.2d 878 , cert. denied, 1976, 425 U.S. 976 , 96 S.Ct. 2179 , 48 L.Ed.2d 801 ; United States v. Toombs, 5 Cir., 1974, 497 F.2d 88 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
ca9 1978
See, e. g., Wallace Clark & Co. v. Acheson Industries, 532 F.2d 846 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 976 , 96 S.Ct. 2177 , 48 L.Ed.2d 800 (1976), and cases cited, 532 F.2d at 848 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Safe Flight Instrument Corp. v. United Control Corp.
See, e. g., Wallace Clark & Co. v. Acheson Industries, 532 F.2d 846 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 976 , 96 S.Ct. 2177 , 48 L.Ed.2d 800 (1976), and cases cited, 532 F.2d at 848 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jonathan Townsend
(2×)
See also United States v. Gurule, 522 F.2d 20 (10th Cir. 1975), certiorari denied, 425 U.S. 976 , 96 S.Ct. 2177 , 48 L.Ed.2d 800 .
Humane Society of Austin and Travis County
v.
Austin National Bank
v.
Austin National Bank
No. 75-1417.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 19, 1976.
Published
Sup. Ct. Tex. Certiorari denied.