Davis v. Burlington N., Inc., 429 U.S. 1002 (1976). · Go Syfert
Search
Davis v. Burlington N., Inc., 429 U.S. 1002 (1976). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
268 citation events (20 in the last 25 years) across 40 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: McGraw v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. (wva, 1997-12-15) · Strongest negative: Callaway v. East Texas Government Credit Union (texapp, 1981-06-26)
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977 2001 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "but see" Callaway v. East Texas Government Credit Union (2×)
Tex. App. · 1981 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Hodges v. Community Loan & Investment Corp., 133 Ga.App. 336 , 210 S.E.2d 826 (1974) and Ken-Lu Enterprises v. Neal, 29 N.C.App. 78 , 223 S.E.2d 831 (1977), cert. den’d., 429 U.S. 1002 , 97 S.Ct. 533 , 50 L.Ed.2d 614 (1976).
examined Cited "see" McGraw v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. (3×)
W. Va. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Davis v. Burlington Northern, Inc., 541 F.2d 182, 185 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1002 , 97 S.Ct. 533 , 50 L.Ed.2d 613 (1976) (citing Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio R.R., 372 U.S. at 117 , 83 S.Ct. at 665 and Inman v. Baltimore & Ohio R.R.
examined Cited "see" United States v. Joseph Laspesa, Victor E. Murgo, Steven A. Sarault, Aime J. Sarault (3×)
11th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Morgan v. Massey, 526 F.2d 347, 348 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1002 , 97 S.Ct. 533 , 50 L.Ed.2d 613 (1976).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Norman B. Smith and Robert A. Bailey (2×)
10th Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Fairbanks, 541 F.2d 862 (10th Cir.) (case involving deliberately inflated invoices submitted to federally insured bank), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1002 , 97 S.Ct. 532 , 50 L.Ed.2d 613 (1976); United *441 States v. Lipkis, 770 F.2d 1447, 1452 (9th Cir.1985).
cited Cited "see" State v. Simmons
Iowa · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Council Bluffs Savings Bank v. Simmons, 243 N.W.2d 634, 637 (Iowa 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1001 , 97 S.Ct. 532 , 50 L.Ed.2d 613 (1976)).
examined Cited "see" Brown v. Stanwick Intern., Inc. (3×)
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See Davis v. Burlington Northern, Inc., 541 F.2d 182, 185 (8th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1002 , 97 S.Ct. 533 , 50 L.Ed.2d 613 (1976); Gwinett v. Albatross S.S.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Charles Glenn Johnson (2×)
5th Cir. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Fairbanks, 541 F.2d 862, 864 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1002 , 97 S.Ct. 532 , 50 L.Ed.2d 613 (1976); United States v. Niro, supra at 441.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Monty Edward Clayborne, Jr. And George Ingram (2×)
10th Cir. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Hufford, 539 F.2d 32 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1002 , 97 S.Ct. 533 , 50 L.Ed.2d 614 (1976), in which agents installed a beeper in a drum of caffeine which had been ordered by the defendants.
examined Cited "see" Dulin v. Circle F Industries (3×)
8th Cir. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See 9 Wright & Miller, Federal Practice & Procedure, Civil, § 2524, and cases cited including Schneider v. Chrysler Motors Corp., 401 F.2d 549, 554-55 (8th Cir. 1968). 63 In the recent case of Davis v. Burlington Northern, Inc., 541 F.2d 182, 186 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1002 , 97 S.Ct. 533 , 50 L.Ed.2d 613 (1976), this court said: 64 . . .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Andrew F. Burton (2×)
D.C. Cir. · 1978 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare United States v. Ruiz, 533 F.2d 939, 940 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1002 , 97 S.Ct. 532 , 50 L.Ed.2d 613 (1976) (trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing both continuance and withdrawal where no effort was made to solve problems during long period before trial).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Tussell (2×)
M.D. Penn. · 1977 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare United States v. Hufford, 539 F.2d 32 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1002 , 97 S.Ct. 533 , 50 L.Ed.2d 614 . (1976), with United States v. Holmes, 537 F.2d 227 (5th Cir. 1976) (per curiam), aff’g by an evenly divided court en banc, 521 F.2d 859 (5th Cir. 1975). 32 In addition since none of the defendants had rights violated during the entry to install the transponder, there was no infringement of Fourth Amendment rights by the monitoring.
Davis
v.
Burlington Northern, Inc.
No. 76-631.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 6, 1976.
429 U.S. 1002
Cited by 50 opinions  |  Published

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.